On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Manoj Srivastavasriva...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up a selinux related release goal for
Squeeze.
Developer assiociated: Manoj Srivastava (Perhaps also Russell Coker,
but I have not discussed this with him)
On 7/5/07, Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I see that apparently dhcp3 is still frozen for some reason and requiring
you guys to let it into testing. Can you do that? How come it's still
frozen? Is it because it makes a udeb?
Hi Andrew,
Yes, right now the package is blocked just
On 4/12/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heya,
The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny
release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger
software packaging teams in Debian first.
[ Wearing my debian-desktop and pkg-gnome
On 3/6/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:57:43AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I would like to ask desktop-base 4.0.1 unblock. 4.0.0.1 that was
uploaded to experimental and merged on 4.0.1 fixed four bugs. With
4.0.1 we've finally common
)
[ Loic Minier ]
* Depend on librsvg2-common for SVG support.
-- Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:08:41 -0200
thanks in advance,
-- stratus
http://stratusandtheswirl.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 12/15/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:43:32PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which
On 12/15/06, Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 11:36 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
it
will be -3, since -2 (sid) was built against the libpng in sid
-2 in sid is 4.3.99.2, new upstream release. Current Etch is 4.3.99.1-1.
Steve,
Fixing my previous information
On 12/15/06, Yves-Alexis Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ven, 2006-12-15 at 14:35 -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Fixing my previous information it's supposed to be 4.3.99.1-2 in
t-p-u, with the desktop artwork related diff. Is it ok for you
Yves-Alexis?
It's ok but I need to find a way
On 12/12/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 23:27]:
xfce4-session 4.3.99.2 is part of Xfce 4.4rc2, which has been more or
less uploaded to unstable, with some delay (some rc2 packages have
reached testing, some are only in unstable and
On 12/11/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still hoping to see 2.58 get into etch, because #386244 is a really
*nasty* bug, even though it won't effect enough users to be RC.
I also still hope to release a tasksel 2.59, which would probably be
limited to task changes (some of which are
On 12/12/06, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI, tasksel 2.58 (sid) is critical for the Debian Desktop initiative.
Please consider push it into Etch.
It was already pushed in by aba.
Thank you for the update Marc.
regards
On 12/8/06, Alex de Oliveira Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grdesktop[1,2] don't have upstream update since 04/30/2004.
I sent email to upstream but he didnt answered me.
I believe his not working in this program anymore.
Is it buggy or lack features for you in some way?
Popcon[3] says that
Hi,
I guess that gaim[0] and totem[1] transition for testing needs some love.
The new gaim 2 beta is a valid candidate but makes 7 packages
(extensions/plugins for gaim 1.x) uninstallable.
Totem wasn't building on arm, it seems to be a matter of rebuild
attempt due to missing-depends that are
Hi team,
I would like to know the real hardinfo[0] migration status. The last
release isn't building on some archs, but it lists archs (it isn't
'any').
[0] = http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=hardinfo
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=hardinfo
What's wrong
On 9/6/06, Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:10 PM, Gustavo Franco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know the real hardinfo[0] migration status.
That *is* the real status.
The last release isn't building on some archs, but it lists archs
On 7/4/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:43:15AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid
candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps).
Is it just a matter of reschedule
Hi team,
I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid
candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps).
Is it just a matter of reschedule the build on arm or we've a gnome
lib broken there (i guess not since nautilus looks good) ?
[0] =
Hi team,
peacock is missing on arm[0] and sparc (but sparc isn't keeping up,
so nevermind), but 1.9.1-7 got rid of the latest gtkhtml3.6
dependency we had. In other words, we can remove gtkhtml3.6 from sid
(yes will open the bug), but we should be sure that peacock 1.9.1-7
will go into testing,
On 5/28/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:11:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:12:12PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Do you have any opinion about #211765 ? It's really old, and has
sarge-ignore and upstream tags, but will keep
Hi team,
Do you have any opinion about #211765 ? It's really old, and has
sarge-ignore and upstream tags, but will keep new xorg out of
testing after we solve #367986. Are we going to ignore this for Etch
or what?
Thanks in advance,
-- stratus
On 5/25/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 12:45:32AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
[ Second call, the first is here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/04/msg00174.html ]
It seems that wireless-tools is in freeze due to the installer (the
source
Hi,
[ Second call, the first is here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/04/msg00174.html ]
It seems that wireless-tools is in freeze due to the installer (the
source generates an udeb), right? It seems that there's a candidate
(43 days old) to enter testing without any RC bug. Could
On 5/21/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:34:08AM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
(...)
- The kernel failures (that occurs only on SMP boxes) seems to be gone,
at least on the build daemons. I don't know what has been done (if
somebody know, please tell us),
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-11 10:00]:
One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
from the BTS?
There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
provide such a way.
I've
24 matches
Mail list logo
