Bug#601293: unblock: devscripts/2.10.69

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package devscripts The upload is primarily translation updates and build system changes to make the translated devscripts.1 contain the same information as the English versio

Pre-approval for plt-scheme (Was: Re: Bug#598615: plt-scheme: FTBFS on mips/mipsel (error: impossible constraint in 'asm')

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:15:05PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > plt-scheme FTBFS on mipsen in testing: > >> [...] > >> gcc -I./.. > >> -I/build/buildd-plt-scheme_4.2.1-1+b1-mips-JD2ADc/plt-sche

screen-message binNMU

The sm binary package (screen-message source) needs a binNMU to drop a dependency on the experimental version of libpango1.0-0. sm_0.16-1, Rebuild in a clean environment, 1, i386 -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: libgoocanvas-dev

if they are not invasive; - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable; - translation updates - documentation fixes -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: libgoocanvas-dev

ption. $ diff -Naur goocanvas-0.1* | diffstat | tail -n1 133 files changed, 8699 insertions(+), 2295 deletions(-) -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Candidate tpu upload for Vim (was Re: Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1)

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:45:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > James Vega wrote: > > I've prepared a candidate for tpu upload[0] to fix the issues which I > > think should be fixed for Lenny. Source diff[1], runtime diff[2], and > > full debdiff[3] are available. > &

Candidate tpu upload for Vim (was Re: Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1)

1.debdiff.gz Source: vim Version: 1:7.1.314-3+lenny1 Distribution: testing-proposed-updates Urgency: low Maintainer: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:01:50 -0400 Closes: 384635 456897 486502 492450 492519 499451 500381 Changes: vim (1:7.1.314-3+lenny1) testing-proposed-u

Re: Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:23:42AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Although this is a new upstream version, their are various important > > changes (including fixes for and related to grave bugs) in the

Re: Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1

e uploading 2:7.2.010-2 RSN to fix the bug I mentioned earlier (one line fix) which, if 7.2.010 hasn't already been discounted for Lenny, would be package I'd prefer to see in Lenny. On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:46:58PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > The following are the issues I stron

Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1

0.html Source: vim Version: 2:7.2.010-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:56:03 -0400 Closes: 399784 424033 441785 456897 482373 482776 485119 486114 487120 487221 487385 488557 41 489667 489853 492450 492519 49945

Re: Unblock request for vim/2:7.2.010-1

On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 01:46:43PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > - vim-tiny and vim-runtime install conflicting files (as of 1:7.1-056+1) > which was handled by vim-runtime Replacing vim-tiny. This was changed > to use diversions in 1:7.1.314-1 to avoid losing files if vim-runtime >

Give back vim on s390

Vim failed to build on s390 (debian-31.osdl.marist.edu) due to #477759: Setting up dbus (1.2.1-3) ... The user `messagebus' already exists. Exiting. dpkg: error processing dbus (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 #477759 seems to indicate that this is

Re: Bug#440704: Package vim completely broken on alpha

ke to get this resolved in time for the upcoming Sarge update. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please hint Vim for etch

an get hinted into testing? Is there anything holding the package back? Thanks, James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please hint Vim for etch

0 - translation update for swapfile prompt in zh_TW locale Thanks, James [0] - The current package in testing has a fix for 395413 but I've pulled upstream's fix for the packages targeted at t-p-u. [1] - http://people.debian.org/~jamessan/vim_1:7.0-122+1.etch1/ -- GPG Key: 1024D/

Possible binNMUs for packages depending on libdbus-1-2

gnome-screensaver Package: gnome-utils Package: libgalago2 Package: libtotem-plparser1 Package: totem-gstreamer Package: totem-xine James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: binNMU for Vim

On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 01:56:45AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * James Vega [Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:03:29 -0400]: > > > Could Vim be queued for a binNMU on all archs to fix bugs 373762, > > 373696, 373890, and 374060. The new ruby1.8 has been uploaded which > > fixes the

binNMU for Vim

Could Vim be queued for a binNMU on all archs to fix bugs 373762, 373696, 373890, and 374060. The new ruby1.8 has been uploaded which fixes the config errors that were being seen. Thanks, James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Descr

binNMU for cdecl

cdecl currently depends on libreadline4 on i386 (and hurd-i386) which no longer exists in the archive. This should be binNMU'able since the package Build-Depends on 'libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev'. Thanks, James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega &l