Hi Drew and Sebastian, The getfem issues on the tracker should be fixed in my last pull request. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/getfem/-/merge_requests/3
I can also add the transition to a newer mumps in the same branch if you like. Best regards Konstantinos On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:12 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@emerall.com> wrote: > On 2022-09-22 10:07, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2022-09-19 13:28:21 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > >> On 2022-09-19 12:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >> > On 2022-09-19 11:54:36 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > >> > > This transition can be considered done, if we're happy with the > >> > > state of > >> > > rheolef reported by > >> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html > >> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rheolef > >> > > >> > It's only done when the old mumps libraries are removed from testing. > >> > That's currently blocked by getfem and rheolef: > >> ... > >> > The both need to be fixed or removed from testing. > >> > >> I see it, thanks for the clarification. > > > > What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package > > renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished. > > > Hi Sebastian, Konstantinos Poulios was preparing the getfem package. I > uploaded on his behalf. > > Kon, getfem has some bugs preventing it from migrating to testing (the > forthcoming new stable release), and tests are failing on i386 and > ppc64el. We're trying to rebuild in order to finalise a recent upgrade > of mumps to v5.5.1. The tracker page for getfem is > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/getfem > > Can you see what updates the getfem package needs? > > Drew > > [changing mail address to avoid the gmail spam filter] >
