On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:45:37PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
I have to think that this has something to do with the machine
being a rp3440 (large memory and cache). I have never seen this
on my c3750 with 32-bit UP kernel. Also, this was with a 64-bit
UP kernel.
If I remember
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:56:12AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Unpacking busybox-udeb (from udebs/busybox-udeb.udeb) ...
dpkg: error processing udebs/cdebconf-newt-terminal.udeb (--unpack):
subprocess dpkg-split killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
Errors were encountered while
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:23:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Helge Deller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 23. Dezember 2008:
Patch in parisc git tree:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread -
which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes stuff
break on newer, faster hardware. And if we want to provide a stable and
useful port to
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
+ * Non maintainer upload.
+ * irqbalance would segfault on startup when /proc/interrupts contains
+an interrupt with a number of 256 or larger, since internally it
+stored data in a fixed-length array. Newer versions
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:17:02PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
the stable version in december. It's not
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:46:17PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
I've waited a while to weigh in on this.
Anyway, I don't particularly much care for stable releases. I have no
problems with HPPA being punted from lenny and existing only as sid, as
long as people still take patches to fix
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:23:42AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-19 19:08]:
This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
We use gcc-4.1 for the
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Grant Grundler writes:
...
Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
Can I apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3 on my hybrid system and get
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the bug reproducible.
Right. The buildd is set up to deliver SIGBUS on unaligned accesses.
This is configurable, and
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:22:12PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:38:36AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
This affects packages that use feholdexcept and
fesetenv, such as uic from QT.
It's not a very long list. I hacked the following short script
to search a local
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs? The
only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the
glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Badtm.
You are, of
3) an effort seems to be happening inside the upstream kernel to use the
request_firmware infrastructure which allows to load firmware code from
userland through an hotplug mechanism. There seem to be more and more
drivers going this way, since there aare more in current git than
13 matches
Mail list logo
