e d-i bugs
- test d-i regularly
- fix d-i bugs/issues
I am a DD.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
test/mpi/runtests.in:$defaultTimeLimit = $ENV{"MPITEST_TIMEOUT"};
test/mpi/runtests.in:if (defined($ENV{"MPITEST_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER"})) {
test/mpi/runtests.in: $defaultTimeLimitMultiplier =
$ENV{"MPITEST_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER"};
We can try to send a patch if it helps.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2018-06-30 14:27 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise :
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>
>> People from DSA have also attempted to fix them in other ways over the
>> last few months (thanks for that too!), but the solutions have been
>> rejected. I
om a more distanced view, it would be nice though for other ports in
the future if dak's knowledge about architectures could be decoupled
from "dpkg-version-in-stable", and no other parts were too coupled in
general to versions of packages from stable. The very nature of ports
means that sometimes they need features not present in packages by the
time that they entered stable.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi,
2018-04-20 1:52 GMT+02:00 Guillem Jover :
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 18:45:49 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 16:05 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> > 2018-02-18 22:26 Guillem Jover:
>> > > I'd like to upda
basically he's waiting for an ack of the
.debdiff before uploading to proposed-updates.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
ative solution for the
RISC-V support, waiting to the next stable update is a bit too much,
and still there's no guarantee that it'll be accepted then.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
t the new architecture. After that,
several other packages can add support for the architecture, without
receiving an automatic reject when uploaded.
It would be great if this update could enter in the next stable update,
so we can make progress on that front.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
n failed to double-check when uploading).
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
.
All right, I will do that. Thanks!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
my pro zápis not, ovladače
zvukových zařízení a software pro zpracování zvuku.";
diff -Nru --exclude '*.po' --exclude '*.pot' --exclude 'configure*' --exclude
'*.gmo' aptitude-0.8.7/debian/changelog aptitude-0.8.8/debian/changelog
--- aptitude-0.8.7/debian/
).
It started to build again, so maybe it succeeds this time; failing
that I will try to sort it out.
But just to let you know, in the case that you want to reopen the bug
until it's built there.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
, long queue).
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
7-03-05 23:19:57.0 +0100
+++ aptitude-0.8.7/debian/changelog 2017-04-19 00:22:12.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+aptitude (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo ]
+ * New upstream release. Please see /usr/share/aptitude/NEWS for a change
+log w
+1,9 @@
+flare-engine (0.19-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix broken symlink to a font, thanks to Andreas Beckmann (Closes: #857395)
+
+ -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:59:47
+0200
+
flare-engine (0.19-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Bump Policy Standards-Version to
s (Closes: #777309)
+
+ [ Helmut Grohne ]
+ * Fix FTCBFS: use the host arch compiler (Closes: #793893)
+
+ -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:34:33
+0200
+
dhcpdump (1.8-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Bump standards-version
nslations and so on).
debdiff --exclude '*.po' --exclude '*.pot' --exclude 'configure*'
--exclude '*.gmo' aptitude_0.8.[56]-1.dsc >
/tmp/aptitude-for-stretch.debdiff
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
aptitude-for-stretch.debdiff
Description: Binary data
amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
commit e46df0b36580be3a1a389f0008b1fc1485b5d963
Author: Manuel A. Fernandez
to be uploaded in
source-only form. I think this feature would be particularly
interesting for the security team.
Just wanted to thank you for this effort, very nice work.
And even if I don't have any authority on the matter, to say that I
believe that it's a worthwhile release go
2015-08-13 19:52 GMT+01:00 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 778034 + transition
> block 778034 by 790756
> reassign 778034 release.debian.org
> stop
>
>
> 2015-08-13 19:16 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
>>
>>
2015-09-01 1:42 GMT+01:00 Scott Howard :
> Hello all,
> mygui uploaded to unstable. Since we're changing the package name back
> to the original SONAME and appending v5, it's gone in the NEW queue
> again.
OK, thank you very much!
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
;rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-9 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu tecnoballz_0.93.1-6 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu trigger-rally_0.6.1-0.1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
Hope that helps.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
g/transitions/html/auto-cal3d.html
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 15:54:38 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Uploaded changes to experimental.
>
> As Julien clarified in
> <https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00426.html>,
> I believe thi
he following upgrade paths:
lenny (ogre-doc-nonfree) -> squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
2014-11-07 11:03 GMT+00:00 Jonathan Wiltshire :
> On 2014-11-06 21:40, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (You might want to do the other reverse dependencies as well: while
>>>> simgear
>>>> is the only one that we know is affec
ess?
Maybe there are other disadvantages about binNMUs that I am missing,
so asking again in debian-release@ just in case. If it's OK to go
ahead, either Alberto or I would fill in bugs asking for the binNMUs.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
s ago.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140815204920.ga3...@lugh.itsari.org
te automatically to
unstable or testing until some period so you have to reupload, etc.
In general, that's not a substitute for having several versions in
unstable or in testing at the same time and be able to switch between
them.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBS
eason to remove packages,
specially when they are intended to be useful only for a relatively
small population.
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=openwalnut
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
t multiple
versions of the same library are discouraged, but maybe it would be
useful in this case to accomodate to the pace of different rdeps?
This library doesn't exist in Debian only (or perhaps even mainly)
because the rdeps in Debian, but because of the library itself, and
many people use
d and led to the situation that
we have now, I am not sure that we should jump to 3.2.1, or even that
it's going to be released before March or April.
But I am open to any suggestion really, I just want to avoid more
problems for rdeps.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
2014/1/23 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo :
> 2014/1/22 Rebecca N. Palmer :
>> choreonoid and ossim turned out to also FTBFS (for
>> non-openscenegraph-related reasons); I have posted a patch for choreonoid
>> (#735891), and suggested that ossim (#735814) move to the already-fi
esting, this would
not prevent OSG to migrate to testing... but it does.
Asking for removal of libopenscenegraph80 alone does not help as long
as there are rev-deps... I asked for removal of src:ogre many months
ago and still not done because Ember depends on it, even if it cannot
build from source f
2013/12/11 Rebecca N. Palmer :
> On 12/11/13 20:59, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> We will discuss it and come up with a plan.
>
>
> Did you decide anything? As the libav transition has now been completed,
> this bug makes openscenegraph uninstallable.
>
and this is delayed for weeks/months typically.
But maybe Alberto (who follows closely upstream) will have more
information or other opinion, or maybe 3.2.1 is released as we discuss
it. We will discuss it and come up with a plan.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
es.
OTOH there're many other packages, and much more important than OSG,
still pending to be built against libav9, so I don't think that this
is so urgent though, and also depends on what happens with 3.2.1.
We will discuss it and see what to do.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fe
2013/1/27 Julien Cristau :
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 17:42:48 +0000, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>>
>> Could Release Team please say if the changes proposed in #694870 to
>> fix an RC bug are OK to go?
>>
> Please include an actual diff in th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: mariodeb...@gmail.com
Hi,
Could Release Team please say if the changes proposed in #694870 to
fix an RC bug are OK to go?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
also some other fixes, including enabling hardened builds.
The changes are not very intrusive, I think, but we're not very sure
about dh compat level 7 -> 9.
Can you please comment/advise?
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
debdiff_openscenegraph-3.0.1-3_to_-4.diff
Description: Binary data
2012/10/4 Philipp Kern :
> For the record: I just added an unblock hint for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3.
Thank you very much.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Just to be clear...
2012/7/28 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo :
> We've all been spending more time on this that this package
> really deserves.
I'm also including you (Philipp) in this group, for the P-a-s file and
these e-mails; as well as other debian-release folks who looked a
2012/7/28 Philipp Kern :
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:47PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> These changes that you mention, were introduced the 26th of April for
>> 0.3.1-2, well before the release, without any bug report being
>> submitted since then. This
2012/7/28, Philipp Kern :
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:58:28AM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> wrote:
>> I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3.
>>
>> There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
>> unstable before th
e
freeze period or beyond (once released).
So I think that the best thing to do is to allow -3 to go in, the only
actual change it's the restriction on architectures (see debdiff
attached), and it was requested before buildd team accepted to remove
it from the P-A-S file:
http://bugs.debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3
There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
unstable before the freeze, but -2 failed to build in kfreebsd-i38
2012/7/8 Cyril Brulebois :
> given the freeze has started already, and there's nothing like a stable
> release for the 0.16 series, it looks to me like the best way to go for
> your package is backports to wheezy-backports once wheezy is released.
OK, thanks for the tip!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hello,
The game "flare" is based on SDL libraries only and with no
dependencies outside that. The first release of the game was in 2010.
The initial version in Debian was 0.14 in october 2011, followed by
0.15.1 by the turn of the year. It quickly reached (and stabilised)
on popcon of ~100 even
Hello,
I would like to ask an unblock to sdl-stretch/0.3.1-3.
There's an unblock already for sdl-stretch/0.3.1-2 because it was in
unstable before the freeze, but -2 failed to build in kfreebsd-i386
and thus it never migrated to testing:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=sdl-stretc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU k3d 0.8.0.2-18 in mipsel. I believe that this is a
transient error particular to mipsel, related with Python support or
dependencies: it's the same situation explained for my n
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please binNMU ogre 1.7.4-5 in mipsel. ogre-1.8 is very similar, has
been rebuilt a couple of days ago without problems. Neither 1.7 nor
1.8 fail in any other architectures, so I believe tha
kages were not named *.so, and the problem was undetected for several
versions.
If the unblock is not acceptable for some reason, probably it would be
better to remove it altogether.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.
more than 6 to a year by the time the release happens), if there is not a
specific problem with the new version.
Fast forward 1.5 to 2 years, when Squeeze is about to be EOL'd. Why would
you use software 3 years old, with maintainance releases maybe stopped since
long, with
Hello,
The packages are finally updated in testing. You can remove the freeze
exception if they are already there. Thanks, Release Team!
Cheers.
On Sunday 08 August 2010 14:21:57 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Saturday 07 August 2010 20:12:27 David Martín
already reflected in the
PTS web site. Thanks to you too, Philipp.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201008081421.58136.manuel.montez...@gmail.com
should work. It's indeed
> true that edos-debcheck on the wanna-build side might not, but if this
> is the case please file a bug against buildd.debian.org after it has
> been uploaded. The package can be given to the builders overriding this
> check, too.
>
> Again, maybe the sol
, I think that it's
better to remove them completely.
What's your opinion about this, David and Release Managers?
Cheers.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/aqsis.html
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/k3d.html
[3] http://sourceforge.net/projects/aqsis/files/
[4] http://source
56 matches
Mail list logo
