Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
please remove pj from testing and unstable. It's outdated,
probably buggy and has a very low popcon (~10). I found it
particularly hard to contact upstream recently and I have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package openmpi
The latest upload of Open MPI fixes one RC bug (#592892).
It also adds support for Torque. I'm aware this is wishlist,
but it's a minor change and h
Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 18:22 -0500 schrieb Pavan Balaji:
> If we choose to do the first approach, what exactly needs to change in
> the mpich2 source? It looks like this is more of a packaging issue for
> Debian?
As Lucas already said, we're already happy with what MPICH2 provides.
But t
Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2010, 13:12 -0500 schrieb Pavan Balaji:
> Ok, this is the part I didn't understand fully. Is MPICH2's build
> failing when includedir is specified as a different location? (I just
> tried that on my machine and it seems to work correctly for me.) Or did
> you mean some oth
Am Montag, den 05.04.2010, 17:22 +0200 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> So, did you spend this time on doing fixes already? :-)
Yes, I indeed did. Not as much as I'd liked too, but nevertheless.
> It would be great to see at least a few patches for the breaking
> packages before the new defaults
Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 19:30 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Given the low number of packages that FTBFS with mpich2 as mpi-default,
> I would say that this could be fixed in the failing packages' build
> system, no?
Sure. It might need some severe patching, though.
> "Fixing" that my provi
Am Samstag, den 20.03.2010, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Manuel Prinz writes:
> > This would enable to fix these in a timely fashion. I could start
> > doing that tomorrow night. How does that sound to you?
>
> Sounds good. Sorry for my delayed an
Am Mittwoch, den 17.03.2010, 13:24 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 17/03/10 at 09:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > > So, it looks like it is mostly build system bugs, and it should not be
> > > too hard to fix.
> >
> > Good to know, thanks for your work.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
as requested by Marc Brockschmidt in <87ocj81kt4@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de>,
I file this bug for the mpi-defaults transition.
As discussed on the Debian Science l
Hi Marc!
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 09:57 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
> Sorry for the long delay. […] Therefore, we would like you
> to wait a bit more, until we are done with hdf5.
No problem! Sorry for being impatient! Waiting for the hdf5 transition
to finish is of course fine. We ju
Dear release team,
it's been a week since my request and we did not get a reply so far. Can
you please let us know how to proceed with this?
Best regards
Manuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Hi Riku!
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 23:10 +0200 schrieb Riku Voipio:
> Manuel Prinz wrote:
> > One big step in this effort is to change the mpi-defaults package to no
> > longer use LAM/MPI. We (as in: debian-science) agreed to use MPICH2 on
> > the architectures were Op
Dear release team,
there were several discussions on debian-science@ about the status of
MPI implementations in Debian, the latest starting at [1]. The consensus
was that we'd like to get rid of LAM/MPI and MPICH1 in Squeeze+1 since
they are no longer cared for upstream and better alternatives exi
Dear release team!
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2009, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Then there's a weird failure of boost1.38/amd64 with mpic++ segfaulting,
> and I didn't look at more stuff.
>
> Could you check what's wrong with the packaging?
All bugs blocking the transition should be fixed in
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2009, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Could you check what's wrong with the packaging?
I fixed the update-alternatives issue in SVN. The fakeroot issue is more
serious and still under investigation. mpicc segfaults when called via
fakeroot. I did not see this behaviour b
On Sat, May 30, 2009 5:29 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Okay, thanks. I went ahead and scheduled the required Bin-NMUs.
Thanks!
> Unfortunately, most of them failed, seemingly due to an error in
> alternatives handling:
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=arpack,blacs-mpi,b
Hi Release Team!
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 12:43 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Okay, thanks for pursuing this, let's go forward with it. Please upload
> and let us know when you have done so.
Done. Uploaded as 1.3.2-2, no modifications compared to 1.3.2-1 in
experimental.
Best regards
Manuel
Am Freitag, den 15.05.2009, 14:19 +0200 schrieb Manuel Prinz:
> [ Open MPI transition foo ]
Just read your mail to d-d-a@, so the last mail is more or less moot.
Sorry for the bad timing and noise! Nevertheless, it would be great to
hear about then when-abouts.
Best regards
Manuel
--
Dear release team!
It's been almost 6 weeks now since my initial request without any reply
besides "please wait". I assume this just got lost/forgotten, but I
really need to have an answer whether I can upload or not. Open MPI is
not listed in the "Unstarted transition" section on [1], so I guess
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 13:47 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Please wait for a bit until we can get to your message. It usually takes
> us some time until we get to the most recent mails on the list.
After more than two weeks of waiting and due to increasing user request,
I uploaded the pac
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 13:47 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Please wait for a bit until we can get to your message. It usually takes
> us some time until we get to the most recent mails on the list.
OK, sorry for being pressuring! I just saw replies to several other
mails and was unsure wh
Dear release team,
Am Samstag, den 04.04.2009, 21:14 +0200 schrieb Manuel Prinz:
> [ Upload of Open MPI ]
since I have not heared back yet, are you OK with me uploading Open MPI
to unstable? Or is there another prodecure I should follow?
I'd really like to get the bugs fixed.
Best
[ Please keep the Open MPI team mailing list in CC when responding.
Thanks! ]
Dear release team,
between versions 1.2 and 1.3 the ABI of Open MPI broke. The next upload
will fake an SONAME change by changing the library package name. I had
contact with Adeodata Simo about this (see bug #510845).
t linking.
+ * debian/control: Removed XS-Autobuild field
+ * debian/copyright: Added missing copyrights and licenses for ROMIO and
+ GNU libltdl
+
+ -- Manuel Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:41:16 +0200
+
openmpi (1.2.7~rc2-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Dirk Eddelbuett
24 matches
Mail list logo
