On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:38:48PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Source: xemacs21-packages
> Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.2-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch buster bullseye sid
...
> The file
> xemacs-packages/jde/java/src/jde/debugger/expr/LValue.java
> incorporates a non-free license, stating
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:52:37AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:07 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We're getting to the point where there's a fairly pressing need for
> > arm64 - the more useful hardware is starting to get a wider distribution
> > and
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners
> > of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on
> > the Skylake platform.
+0100
+++ xemacs21-21.4.22/debian/changelog 2015-01-19 12:23:54.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xemacs21 (21.4.22-11) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Remove GNOME transitional packages which have been present for more
+than one release already to avoid hang (closes: #775733).
+
+ -- Mark Brown
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 11:11:54PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu cvsgraph_1.7.0-2 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean sid environment.
cvsgraph/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:12:37AM +0200, Thomas Martitz wrote:
The version discrepancy between i386 and amd64 breaks installation of other
multi-arch packages, e.g. wine.
The actual problem is that multiarch breaks binnmus. There's already
been a sourceful upload to clean up this mess.
--
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you are
seeing and contact the release team (who are responsible for binnmus
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
Recent binNMU of zlib1g on amd64 made it impossible to co-install it in a
multi-arch environment.
What makes you say this, and why are you filing a bug on the package?
Please provide a description of whatever problem you think you
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:44:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 13:36 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
[1] After a binnmu, the version numbers and changelogs don't match
so dpkg refuses to install a package for both architectures at the
same time.
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:24:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
in future. A minor concern I have is that I find it hard to get bug
fixes reviewed and applied upstream.
For this part of the problem seems to be that the systems Debian chooses
to support are mostly not ones that get much active
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Patrick Matth??i wrote:
It is not oss-only; roaraudio just fucks up in the current code base if
there is ONLY alsa available.
Could you be more specific please? One of the biggest motiviations for
removing OSS is to get rid of the need for the OSS
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that
nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at
least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't
have two things claiming
state
but none of them seem to have a summary of what the intention is - does
anyone have any information here?
Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org
doodle (U)
Mark Brown broo...@debian.org
nis
Tim Cutts t...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
am-utils
Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
unfs3
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:54:59PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
The kernel team is discussing the possibility of increase the default
value of mmap_min_addr in lenny (it has already been done for
sid). Obviously this has implications for the wine and dosemu packages
(are there others?)
qemu I
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:58:22AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
While we are at it, we could eliminate some other legacy sound systems.
The key goal is to have a more reliably working sound in debian. When
there are less sounds systems to choose from, it is less likely that
users try to use the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:12:46PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
Well, at packaging level there is considerable amount of overlap. If
you are going through the trouble of adding --disable-oss configure
flag to debian/rules, you can at the same time add --disable-arts
--disable-nas and
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:56:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
OSS in Linux is unmaintained, doesn't support much current hardware, and
will not be included in future kernel packages. Unfortunately, there
are still some applications living in the 90s and trying to write to
/dev/dsp. These
architectures (closes: #533015).
-- Mark Brown broo...@debian.org Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:49:05 +0100
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
).
-- Mark Brown broo...@debian.org Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:43:18 +
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:02:49PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk writes:
I recently uploaded Leafnode 1.11.7-rc1-10 to unstable with the only
change being an update to the Spanish Debconf template translations.
It's not possible to migrate
I recently uploaded Leafnode 1.11.7-rc1-10 to unstable with the only
change being an update to the Spanish Debconf template translations.
It's not possible to migrate this to testing since Leafnode depends on
pcre3 which has had a shlibs bump and a new upstream release between
testing and unstable
Please consider allowing fort77 1.15-8 to migrate to lenny - it has one
change fixing a severity important bug:
fort77 (1.15-8) unstable; urgency=low
* Accept source files outside the current directory when generating
debug symbols (closes: #507397).
-- Mark Brown broo...@debian.org Sun
around errors from
fprintf() with multi-byte characters (closes: #487104).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:24:44 +0100
The code change introduced for this is:
--- nis-3.17.orig/yp-tools-2.9/src/ypcat.c
+++ nis-3.17/yp-tools-2.9/src/ypcat.c
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@
char
Please consider allowing x86info 1.21-2 to enter testing. This version
contains small updates to the control file to allow the package to build
on kfreebsd-amd64:
x86info (1.21-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Add support for kfreebsd-amd64 (closes: #493471).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ågren [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #492750).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:24:14 +0100
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:21:59AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/18/08 10:11, Mike Hommey wrote:
Note iceweasel 3.0, which is planned for Lenny, while it contains
embedded copy of code, does *not* use it. Find another example.
Contains embedded code, but doesn't use it?
And it hasn't
Please allow the current zlib to transition to lenny. This version adds
triarch builds of the library package for MIPS:
zlib (1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply patch from Arthur Loiret [EMAIL PROTECTED] implementing
triarch support for MIPS (closes: #474097).
-- Mark Brown
contents.
* Policy 3.7.3 (no changes).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:38:47 +
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
: #448651).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:01:55 +
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:34:54 +0100
Thanks.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Could you please force usbview 1.0-11 into testing once SPARC has built?
The s390 porters have decided to mark the package as not-for-us,
presumably due to a lack of USB on s390 systems, but there is a s390
binary currently
Could you please force usbview 1.0-11 into testing once SPARC has built?
The s390 porters have decided to mark the package as not-for-us,
presumably due to a lack of USB on s390 systems, but there is a s390
binary currently in testing so the package will be unable to migrate to
testing without
Hi,
As documented in #422141 (originally #372655) the etch version of
viewcvs is unable to display files in a CVS repository which have been
updated using the etch version of CVS. Since this seems like a major
enough problem to warrant an update to etch but you appear to be rather
busy at the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:01:00PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Recent versions of NIS have included support in ypbind for Network
Manager. This support currently causes ypbind to disable NIS client
functionality when Network Manager reports that the computer is
disconnected. Unfortunately
Recent versions of NIS have included support in ypbind for Network
Manager. This support currently causes ypbind to disable NIS client
functionality when Network Manager reports that the computer is
disconnected. Unfortunately, Network Manager is frequently installed on
systems where it is not
.
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:47:28 +
plus a contentless change to the Spanish template caused by running
debconf-updatepo.
Thanks.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please consider nis 3.17-4 for inclusion in testing. It adds a new
translation to the Debconf templates:
nis (3.17-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Add Galician translation of Debconf templates, kindly supplied by Jacobo
Tarrio [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #412865).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL
in reportbug script.
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:58:52 +
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please allow powertweak 0.99.5-16 into testing. It removes a spurious
use of Debconf from the powertweakd postinst which caused installation
failures when debconf was not installed.
Thanks.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:37:29AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Please change that to a dependency on debconf | debconf-2.0
Actually in -16 I removed the dependency which was entirely spurious
anyway. I had too much faith in the bug report, sorry.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like
Please consider allowing powertweak 0.99.5-15 into testing. It fixes RC
bug #408276, a missing dependency on debconf:
powertweak (0.99.5-15) unstable; urgency=medium
* Explicitly depend on debconf in powertweakd (closes: #408276).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:43:21
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs
script to be something between 19nis and 20apache?
It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle
it looks like the best option.
--
You
].
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:07:09 +
Thanks.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please unblock tendra 4.1.2-16. This version fixes release critical
(but ignored for etch) bug #403215:
tendra (4.1.2-16) unstable; urgency=medium
* Don't ship trans and drop confict with transcriber (closes: #403215).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:37:52 +
Thanks
Upstream are contemplating releasing a new bugfix version of zlib.
Assuming that it doesn't change the ABI or API (they're generally very
good about this and the prerelease looks OK from the review I gave it)
would you be OK with me uploading it to unstable?
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell
not being able to execute 64 bit code. Similarly, don't worry if
dh_shlibdeps fails and hard code an unversioned dependency on the
appropriate libc.
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:38:11 +0100
zlib (1:1.2.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Since GCC no longer ICEs
The version of zlib in testing currently lacks the last round of
security fixes to the library. As well as fixing the security issues
this would also avoid confusion on the part of users upgrading from
stable who often find that they can't install the -dev package due to
already having the
: #307684).
* Use GCC 3.4 on amd64 since that is required in order to build i386
assembler (the default is GCC 3.3).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 7 May 2005 15:39:20 +0100
x86info (1.13-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Correct spelling mistake in man page (closes: #306720).
-- Mark
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:24:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
- config.sub and config.guess updates look safe enough, but why are these
necessary in a security release?
I noticed a couple of mails on the -release list mentioning this. I
don't know about this particular package but things like
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:45:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :)
Yes, sorry - confusion due to the freeze announcment preceeding the
archive update for yesterday causing me to think that no more automatic
testing propagation would happen when in
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:00:34PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote:
leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1 is already in testing. :)
But it might need another update; 1.11.2 fixes a DoS vulnerability
in fetchnews with relatively minor impact.
That has now been
Please consider Leafnode 1.11.1-1 for inclusion in sarge. It fixes RC
bug #306380 (a recent update to update-inetd fixing #296902 caused
Leafnode's update-inetd usage to fall in all cases except initial
installation). While this version of the package also includes a new
upstream release the
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Someone who installs from 3.0r[012] should have stable in sources.list.
There is no need to have packages available in both places, at least
not several weeks after the release of 3.0r3.
Assuming they've got a network source in
).
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:40:57 +0100
zlib (1:1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove shlibs from udeb.
-- Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:06:41 +0100
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
Please consider pushing the current unstable version of zlib into
testing. It contains a small number of useful bugfixes, including
several reported by Debian users, and should be very low risk.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:53:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If you don't want to change the version in unstable, make the version
you upload to testing be something like 0.11.14-0sarge1 instead. This
allows us to preserve sane upgrades from testing to unstable.
Also note that a single
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
days ago.
May someone please check it? What's the problem?
After packages have
I've got a couple of packages that I really think ought to make it into
sarge but are not making it there because there seems to be no prospect
of them being built by several of the buildds.
One is NIS, where the current version segfaults running ypxfr on PowerPC
(and possibly other
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:04:39PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
severity 227464 important
reassign 232664 uucp
I'm reassigning this bug back to uucp. The fact that
mail-transport-agent did correlate with the rmail command in the past
does not seem to impose an obligation on MTA maintainers
My MM package had a security bug quite some time ago (reported in the
BTS as #154854). Unfortunately, MM has not managed to migrate to
testing since this bug was fixed. Should I do something like file a bug
so that this doesn't drop under the radar for the sarge release?
--
You grabbed my hand
problem that's fixed in this upload. I've not tested the packages
there at all, but equally well I've not had any complaints about them
either.
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk
61 matches
Mail list logo
