of D-I itself.
As there have been a significant number of changes in our mirrors, I'm
thinking of uploading an updated version of choose-mirror too.
Any objections?
no, go ahead.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team Member
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi,
On Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 16:41:15 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
unblock console-setup/1.21
already unblocked by luk already
unblock openssl/0.9.8g-4
unblocked
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team Member
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
integrated.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5541
It should be backported to Etch.
Is it ok to upload a glibc package with this patch to *stable*?
go ahead.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team Member
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Hi,
On Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 21:30:32 +0100, Tobias Toedter wrote:
Hi,
if the Installer team has no objections, the following hint could be
added:
unblock iso-codes/1.8-1
after a short chat with otavio on IRC:
unblocked.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team
to the debian release mailing list
debian-release@lists.debian.org.
Last updated 2008/01/17 21:16 UTC
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Release Team Member
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64
Hi,
On Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 22:32:37 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.1r3
=
Requires further Investigation
--
unace-nonfree stable2.5-1 alpha amd64 arm hppa
Hi,
On Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 23:51:14 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
Can we work out what to do with Sarge next please? Right now, we don't
have working CDs nor any way to make them. Can we push r8 through with
just the small d-i update needed, or should I give up on sarge at this
Hi,
On Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 11:56:01 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:56:30AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Wed Jan 09, 2008 at 23:51:14 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
Can we work out what to do with Sarge next please? Right now, we don't
Hi,
On Fri Jan 04, 2008 at 14:33:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Martin Pitt [2008-01-04 14:32 +0100]:
I attach the debdiff
LALALA, sorry. Here it comes.
Please go ahead.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi,
On Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 11:44:35 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I was recently reminded that the version of aptitude in etch still
has bug #415468, now re-opened as bug #438725. To summarize, it means
that aptitude's manpage looks like this:
To select a particular version of
Hi,
On Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 21:31:07 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
glibc/2.7-5 is ready to go into testing. It fixes bug that are present
in the testing version, and hasn't any known regression.
Could you please hint it?
done
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.1r3
=
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.1r3/.
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can
actually
Hi,
On Sat Dec 29, 2007 at 00:20:15 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
The next revision of stable
should therefore be released at the mid of February or 48h before the
release of Etch, whatever comes first.
ignore that one. i really should kill that from the skel directory..
Greetings
Martin
Hi,
On Wed Dec 26, 2007 at 12:26:13 +0100, Michael Karcher wrote:
Dear stable release manager,
I would like to see the fix to #353494 in a stable point release. Debian
claims to support processors starting at the 486. A bug in the X Server
prevents starting it on any early 486 class
Hi,
On Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 21:09:42 +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
Hi.
Please unblock brltty, it needs to go to testing.
gnome-orca is already waiting for it.
Debian-Installer-Team: Can you please confirm this unblock request?
TIA
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual
Hi,
On Mon Dec 24, 2007 at 09:33:39 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 22:50 +0100, Ina Zobel wrote:
If you disagree with one bit or another, please reply to this mail and
explain why these things should be handled differently.
flashplugin-nonfree stable9.0.31.0.1
Hi Luk,
i guess the subject should have been
Preparation of the next oldstable Debian GNU/Linux update
Greetings
Martin
PS: Happy XMAS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 11:48:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 14 octobre 2007 à 22:36 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 07:31:17PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
as already approved by Julien on IRC, I have uploaded a new gnome-panel
to s-p-u to fix
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: lenny
With the release of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every
point release, to reflect the current revision number of the debian
release (read as in):
now:then:
4.1 4.1r0
That should be documented in the
Hi,
On Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 09:25:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
In other words: everybody who installs the laptop task gets a useless
and confusing question. In joeys words:
...
Hi,
On Thu Sep 06, 2007 at 08:59:17 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1189059142 time_t, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
The debian-installer team would like to fix a few issues that are still
present in the Etch version of d-i.
Before starting the work on updating the packages, I
Hi,
On Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 23:35:04 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello *,
I have encountered that the security mirror has packages from Woody
and such. And since Sarge (OldStable) will get security updates up
to april next year...
Question:
Would be nice, IF, an release
Hi,
On Tue Aug 28, 2007 at 15:03:52 +0100, Chris Robinson wrote:
Hi
Is aacraid in the current release (17th Aug)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 | grep aacr
/lib/modules/2.6.18-5-686/kernel/drivers/scsi/aacraid
Hi,
On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 00:09:54 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Please unblock eject/2.1.5-4 that is blocked because it builds an udeb.
Since it waited four weeks for devmapper it should be safe by now ;)
Any comments from the debian-installer team?
Greetings
Martin
--
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 12:31:38 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Fri Aug 24, 2007 at 00:09:54 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Please unblock eject/2.1.5-4 that is blocked because
Hi,
On Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 16:25:31 +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
Hi,
could you please hint current version of ttf-dejavu (2.19-1) into testing?
the package provides also an udeb used by the graphical installer.
Debian Installer Team, comments?
Greetings
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]#
Hi,
On Mon Aug 20, 2007 at 19:07:50 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
Could you please hint openssl into testing? It has a udeb.
Debian Installer Team, comments?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 18:27:58 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:05:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
hello stable rm,
could you please review #438123 ?
the fix propagated in new upstream and is thus in testing / sid.
the
D-I team,
On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 23:57:03 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
[trimmed long reviewer cc, added debian-boot and fjp ]
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 18:27:58 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
dann frazier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04
Hi,
On Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 14:50:19 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'd like to ask for the inclusion of following hints to be added:
unblock console-data/2:1.02-2
unblocked
unblock debootstrap/1.0.1
unblocked
unblock devmapper/2:1.02.20-2
already unblocked by vorlon
unblock
Hi,
On Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 15:25:18 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
please unblock also reiserfsprogs/1:3.6.19-6 which fixes FTBFS #429006.
No objection
unblocked
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
On Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 06:21:05 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi,
There's an RC bug (#431380) in unace due to it not being 64 bit clean.
Attached the debdiff against stable. Ok to upload?
I could easily also prepare another backport for oldstable...
Go ahead for stable, but we will
Hi,
On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 17:48:18 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote:
SRMs, whats your opinion on this?
I just agree.
So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable
and include it in the next point
Hi,
On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 23:24:19 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2 for the next sarge point release:
apache2 (2.0.54-5sarge2) stable; urgency=low
* Fix some less critical security issues:
* Denial of service for threaded MPMs:
-
On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 21:21:40 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
first of all: am i missing something?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dak ls libimdb-film-perl
libimdb-film-perl | 0.27-1 | unstable | source, all
volatile is thought for stable. But i can't find
.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Stable Release Manager eMail Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Release AssistantICQ: 27309454
Hi,
On Sun Jun 24, 2007 at 20:24:50 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
if there is still enough time before etch r1 release, I could upload a
fix for #430386 (init script not working correctly for sh != bash).
If apache hangs for some reason, this would lead to the logrotate
script
Hi,
i will most probably not accept any further packages[1] for Debian Etch r1
after todays^Wtonights dinstall run, unless someone really convinces me
there is something very important missing. Exception are granted for
packages related to D-I or kernel, if not already uploaded.
Greetings
Hi,
On Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 17:02:50 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The release team requested email about proposed release goals for
Lenny. Here is one. I propose to switch to a dependency based SysV
boot system for Lenny, using the LSB headers in the init.d scripts to
decide the boot
Hi,
On Thu Jun 21, 2007 at 16:42:21 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:14 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
i will most probably not accept any further packages[1] for Debian Etch r1
after todays^Wtonights dinstall run, unless someone really convinces me
Hi,
On Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 00:39:19 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello stable release team
May I upload libdbi-perl_1.53-1etch1 to stable-proposed-updates?
It contains a backported 2-line patch for a potential dataloss
problem (confirmed in the changelog of 1.57) which turned out to
Hi,
On Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 10:44:33 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1181466754 time_t, Lo??c Minier wrote:
Hey,
I've uploaded madwifi_0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch1 prepared by Kel
Modderman with the attached
Hi,
On Wed Jun 06, 2007 at 15:25:31 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1181131884 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It makes Trac unusable for high volume project since it cannot handle
concurrent svn commits nicely. And it happens more frequently that we
would like.
Ok, go ahead.
What does
Hi,
On Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 18:29:42 +0100, R.Penney wrote:
Dear Release Team,
I would like to issue an updated version of 'cryptmount' (from 1.2-1 to
1.2-3) within the current Debian 'Etch' release. This package provides
facilities for managing encrypted filesystems via the kernel
Hi,
On Thu May 31, 2007 at 14:54:16 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
I don't see the RCness of this bug. Please explain.
It is an important bug with major end-user factor as it determines the
default lookfeel of Debian when installing KDE.
As it is trivial to fix
Hi,
On Wed May 23, 2007 at 14:49:21 +0200, Lo?c Minier wrote:
Hi,
I've uploaded desktop-base 4.0.2 yesterday with a fix for #422043
prepared by Fathi Boudra. It's Arch: all.
1) please review the diff between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2
2) does it need to be hinted to testing before it
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1
=
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r1/.
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (etch) and will frequently send reports so people can
actually comment
Hi,
On Thu May 24, 2007 at 17:59:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi Otavio,
before uploading to stable i would like to clarify if this package
should go via r1 or via security.debian.org.
These appear to be workarounds for browser bugs in IE
Hi,
On Sun May 20, 2007 at 11:31:06 +0300, Teodor wrote:
On 5/20/07, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun May 20, 2007 at 00:11:44 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote:
An up-to-date version
Hi,
On Sun May 20, 2007 at 17:29:19 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer
overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580
Maintainer didn't ask for it but should 1:3.7.3-1 be included in 4.0r1?
yes, please upload.
Hi,
On Fri May 18, 2007 at 10:25:22 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Hi,
there was some possible DoS attack with an OS/2 magic of file
discovered, CVE-2007-2026 namely. The security team said, it doesn't
warrant issueing a DSA, that's why I'd like to update it through etch
r1, debdiff is
Hi,
On Sat May 19, 2007 at 08:29:43 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 00:44, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
On Thu May 17, 2007 at 21:04:16 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Please consider accepting debootstrap from testing (0.3.3.3) for
Etch.
Reason is that the version
Hi,
On Sat May 19, 2007 at 11:32:02 +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Bcc list]
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:15:42AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007
Hi,
On Thu May 17, 2007 at 08:11:57 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Not reviewed the patch yet, BUT i will only give my okay, if i get
an explicite ACK from Frans for that.
No objection to accepting it.
please upload.
--
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Mon May 07, 2007 at 15:46:52 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1178512994 time_t, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
I would like to fix #405500 in the next point release,
it is a missing Conflicts, so is it possible to include it?
Ok.
What is the recommended
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0r1
=
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r1/.
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can
actually
Hi,
On Sun May 20, 2007 at 00:11:44 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:48, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote:
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/4.0/4.0r1/.
This yields a 404...
fixed now.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
Hi,
On Thu May 17, 2007 at 01:38:43 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Hi release team,
Of course, as nano is part of d-i, I don't know how difficult accepting
this is.
Not reviewed the patch yet, BUT i will only give my okay, if i get
an explicite ACK from Frans for that.
Greetings
Martin
Hi,
On Fri May 11, 2007 at 14:39:51 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1178878964 time_t, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
That is of important severity. Work has been done to mitigate the effects
of
that bug. Not resolved indeed, but worked around so it's not a critical
issue
anymore: it will
Hi,
Glibc maintainers, what is your opinion on that?
Greetings
Martin
On Fri May 11, 2007 at 14:00:17 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:25:07PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Is there any chance to get a fix for #423369 and #423108, a memory leak
in both libc6 and
Hi Jordi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 03:05:19 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
I've noticed libgksu 2.0.3-9 unfortunately didn't make it in etch, even
if the latest changes were only translation updates.
The package now has transitioned to lenny; I wonder if these kind of
updates are still
Hi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
requalify?
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
Hi,
On Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 19:06:03 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Shortly before the release two translation errors were reported for
partman that I feel are important enough to consider fixing them for
Etch.
For Catalan there is a string asking for simple confirmation of changes
(Write
Hi,
On Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 21:01:02 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
We've just noticed that the version of kernel-wedge used to build the Etch
kernel udebs has not been unblocked for Etch. Our mistake, but this
really should be fixed as that version should definitely also be used for
stable
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important
Hi,
the Stable Release Team is willing to support point releases for
oldstable. For that, a new suite oldstable-proposed-updates is needed.
Please create this new suite as well as a -new area like p-u-new for
oldstable.
Greetings
Martin
-- System
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r6
=
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r6/.
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can
actually
Package: links2
Version: 2.1pre16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: seem to buggy to be supported by the security team
Hi,
on December 21st, DSA 1240 was released from a member of the security
team. It was issued to fix 'arbitrary shell command execution'. Within a
week the
Hi,
On Mon Mar 26, 2007 at 15:12:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:05:15PM +0200, goneri wrote:
Please unblock ode 0.5.dfsg for Etch. This upload remove some non-free
parts of the archive that was not used in the build process.
It also includes this change:
Hi,
On Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 13:16:24 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
Hi Stable Release Manager(s),
Any suggestions on how to handle this bug?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402822
upload a fixed version to proposed-updates, mentioning the CVE id in the
changelog.
Greetings
Hi,
On Thu Mar 08, 2007 at 11:42:22 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload a backport of a bug fix in gnome-panel, the
upstream bug is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121492, the
backports was proposed in august on the GNOME distributor list where we
Hi Frans,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:11:30PM CET, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately we seem to have missed a change that was needed because of
the ABI change in 3.1r3. We have not noticed this until now because the
old kernels were still included in the archive and on CD
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2006.11.22
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi Michael,
could you please include the following attached key (ID ADB11277)? This
is needed, as the Stable Release Managers will sign Etch with this key,
as soon as Etch is released.
Greetings
Martin
--
Hi,
On Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 07:15:06 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The problem is fixed in sarge-proposed-update with glibc version
2.3.2.ds1-22sarge5 since the end of November.
I would like to know if the stable release team is planning to do
something to update the glibc in Sarge.
Yes.
On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 11:59:55 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
hello
is it possible to let this version go into testing.
it improves the font in many ways, here's the upstream
changelog:
I'm not keen to unblock it as it's a new upstream version with lots
of
changes...
i am keen to
On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 19:04:43 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
On 2006-12-26 14:11:39 +0100 Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 11:59:55 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
hello
is it possible to let this version go into testing.
it improves the font in many ways
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Stable Release Manager eMail Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
as the open-iscsi interface in kernel 2.6.18 changed we will need a newer
version of open-iscsi in testing as soon as 2.6.18 hit testing. I
recently NMUed open-iscsi to close two RC bugs and needed to use a new
major upstream version, to get it proper working with kernel 2.6.18. I
therefor
Package: debian-policy
Severity: important
Hi,
during the last months i had to review several packages. Quite a number
of packages were not buildable two times (eg. unrepresentable changes
to source). Most of these packages used svn-buildpackage or
cvs-buildpackage. This bug is quite annoying
to comment on
this list, please send a mail to the debian release mailing list
debian-release@lists.debian.org.
Last updated 2006/09/22 15:29 MET
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian
Hi Roger,
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:07:58AM +0100, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please could you make sure that devmapper is included in the next
stable update? It was supposed to be included in the last update, but
for some reason was omitted.
please go ahead and upload.
Greetings
Hi Matthijs,
Hi,
What about #375494 and #377047, those are security bugs in the current
stable distribution (Sarge) and according to the Security Team it
didn't warrant an upload. Although it has a CVE so I think it's worth
an upload to stable.
What do you think ?
If you are the
Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r4
=
An up-to-date version is at http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r4/.
We are preparing the next revision of the current stable Debian
distribution (sarge) and will frequently send reports so people can
actually
release.
So no, i don't see this this as a valid candidate. Sorry.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Stable Release Manager eMail Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
for stable on bts.turmzimmer.net
Andi will work on that.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Stable Release Manager eMail Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
2.1.5-8sarge4 and only bump the
version number to get the new version built for all architectures into
the archive.
Please go ahead.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas GPG Key-ID:0x5d64f870
Debian DevelopereMail Privat: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:59:53AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
mozilla-thunderbird-devstable1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.7 alpha arm
hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
mozilla-thunderbird-dev
Hi Rene,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:24:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Accepted Packages
-
These packages will be installed into the stable Debian distribution
and will be part of the next revision.
[...]
freetype2
Hi,
Given that I'm away for 3 weeks from now, I leave all this in the
hands of my co-maintainer, Nicolas François (nekral on IRC). Please
get in touch with him for ANY issue related to shadow (please CC me or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). His mail address is CC'ed
to this mail and he is mentioned in
Hi,
for those who wonder why their package did not yet hit proposed-updates,
they want to have a look on [1] and [2].
The backlog we had is now decreasing, d-i builds should have been
started by now.
Greetings
Martin
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg7.html
[2]
Hi AJ,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:02:46PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
find below a list of packages (and their version) which are currently in
queue/p-u-new where the stable release team thinks they are okay, so
please accepted them for proposed-updates.
Thanks
Hi ftpmasters/assistants,
find below a list of packages (and their version) which are currently in
queue/p-u-new where the stable release team thinks they are okay, so
please accepted them for proposed-updates.
cscope/15.5-1.1sarge1
gnupg/1.4.1-1.sarge4
horde2/2.2.8-1sarge3
horde3/3.0.4-4sarge4
Hi Loïc,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:25:20PM +0200, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is #330673.
From the 1.9-1 changelog:
* Fix /etc/network/if-up.d/ip to not set rp_filter to 1 when it isn't
configured. (Closes: #330673) [debian/ip-if-up]
I'm willing to prepare a SPU
Hi Petter,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:57:00AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006-07-10]
Thanks for the information. I currently do not find the time to run
the tests myself, so i will wait for your results. Please keep in
mind that Debian base
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:09:35PM CEST, Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 00:35 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
as LSB 3.1 compatibility is one of the pet release goals for etch, it
would be nice to have some overview of what still needs to be fixed
Hi,
okay with me.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 30 June 2006 23:08, Frans Pop wrote:
Dann has today uploaded the kernel udeb packages for all arches, except
for AMD64 (as that has not yet been released by the security team).
Most
Hi Aurelien,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 06:44:16AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi SRM team!
Would such a fix to the glibc be accepted for a stable release?
i would be first interested, which LSB versions are effected by this. I
don't see any need for fixing newer LSB issues
Hi guys,
as LSB 3.1 compatibility is one of the pet release goals for etch, it
would be nice to have some overview of what still needs to be fixed in
etch for LSB 3.1 compatibility. Could you please rerun the test-suite on
current etch or give me a hint how to do it on my own?
Greetings
Martin
Hi,
to keep everyone in the loop i would like to discuss my current plans
for the r3 timeline.
We have no fixed freeze date for r3 yet, but i currently plan to
freeze one or two weeks after the pending 2.6 kernel update is pushed by
the security team. If this is not enough time for the porters,
Hi Roger,
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:22:08AM +0100, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded a devmapper update to stable-proposed-updates just prior to
the release of r2, but it missed the deadline by a few days.
It's marked on
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:45:12PM +0200, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
* Fabrice Lorrain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060531 00:28]:
I've a vague memory of a general consensus on let's see how it works
during the sarge era for volatile.debian.net.
Any particular
101 - 200 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
