Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

's no schedule for 1.7 to my knowledge, [...] Actually, there is one: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-May/000993.html But we haven't even frozen features or branched for xserver 1.7 yet, so we're way behind. AFAIK the main outstanding blocker is XKB2. -- Earthlin

Re: Bug#353865: Sarge to Etch upgrade with radeon

ion requirement in the radeon X > > driver to something above that to avoid this problem. > > Any progress on this ? Yes, upstream xf86-video-ati no longer enables the DRI with radeon DRM <= 1.7 as of 6.6.1. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer

Re: Bug#387706: - splitting mesa and mesa-legacy for libosmesa

> I have a patch for mesa already (needs to update for yesterday's NMU), BTW, I was a little irritated by this NMU not getting discussed at all beforehand on the pkg-mesa-devel or debian-x lists. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphic

Re: mesa: Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

; experimental, but mesa 6.5.1_rc1 was recently released and appears to > have introduced some regressions, e.g. glxgears crashes > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8010 Fixed in Mesa CVS. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics

Re: linux-2.4 deprecated

version requirement in the radeon X driver to something above that to avoid this problem. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

've been wondering why experimental doesn't have a default priority of 101 in the first place. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer