On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 03:39:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 06:55:31PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >...
> > b) Backport the profiler patch to bookworm's rustc, and do a s-p-u update to
> > Bookworm's rustc. Since this adds a new feature, I don't view it as too
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package firefox-esr
[ Reason ]
Security update for Firefox. The same package has already reached
bullseye.
[ Impact ]
See above
[ Tests ]
Usual smoke tests
[ Risks ]
See
-esr (102.9.0esr-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * gfx/skia/generate_mozbuild.py, gfx/skia/moz.build: Remove explicit NEON
+flags from skia build. Closes: #982794. Thanks Emanuele Rocca.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey Sat, 18 Mar 2023 06:53:38 +0900
+
+firefox-esr (102.9.0esr-1) unstable; urgency=medium
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
libnss3-dev 2:3.89-1 introduced an incompatibility that made builds
against it fail to work with older versions of libnss3. 2:3.89-2 fixed
that. Firefox-esr is also affected, but I'm going
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:04:17PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 06:34:01AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:54:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:36 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> >
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:54:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:36 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:00:57PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 09:37 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > > > If there are no objections,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: binnmu transition
Hi,
Recent versions of libnss3 had a backwards incompatible change that made
packages built with the newer versions fail to work properly with the older
version of the package that is in bullseye.
That wouldn't be a
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 08:14:45AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 07:57:30AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > reopen 990059
> > affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten S
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 07:57:30AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> reopen 990059
> affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian,
> >
> > thanks for
reopen 990059
affects 990059 firefox-esr firefox libcurl3-nss
thanks
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:00:13AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian,
>
> thanks for working on this issue in between times, I wasn't able to do
> anything practically the last days.
>
> Am
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:46:41PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > .
> >
> > Note that Firefox is built with --no-keep-memory
> > --reduce-memory-overheads, and that was still not enough for 32-bt
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:28:31AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 11:46 PM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >
> > [ Please note the cross-post and respect the Reply-To... ]
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This has taken a while in coming, for which I apologise. There's a lot
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:09:12PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> firefox-esr since 52.2.0esr-1 is no longer using the system libs for
> nspr, nss, sqlite; was that an intentional change?
>
> This affects at least sid (where DIST="stretch"):
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 07:24:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Mike Hommey:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
> > weeks or months without it happening?
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> Hi Mike,
>
Hi,
Why has nspr been a valid candidate for testing migration for several
weeks or months without it happening?
Mike
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:39:20AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:59:20 +, Angus Lees wrote:
>
> > Dear SRMs,
> >
> > My understanding is that Debian's new-ish plan is to update firefox-esr
> > versions in stable when there is a security update and the firefox-esr
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Yes, provided that an upload to unstable with a higher version number
happens before or ASAP
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:08:11AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 10/08/15 16:57, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2015-08-10 15:52, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 10/08/15 13:35, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Yes, provided that an upload
tag 771262 - moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:18:09PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:46:34AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
There is going to be a (mostly) security update of iceweasel early next
week.
Please allow it in Jessie
..f1f1617 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+iceweasel (31.3.0esr-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream release.
+
+ * debian/browser.mozconfig.in: Revert change from release 31.2.0esr-3,
+because it made no difference.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:31:04AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
unblock iceweasel/31.2.0esr-3.1
Hello,
I would like to NMU the attached changes to iceweasel. The current
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 06:11:29PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 16/01/2014 17:36, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit :
quick heads up for everyone maintaining xul-ext-* packages:
(CCing pkg-mozext-maintainers@lado then)
We'll soon
Hi,
How disruptive would an upload of iceweasel 23.0-2 to unstable be for
the release team? I would like to push 23 to unstable so that i can push
24 beta to experimental in preparation for next esr version (24 is next
esr), released in about a month.
Cheers,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I just figured the libnss3 package in wheezy contains duplicated
libraries as can be seen on
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/libnss3/filelist :
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreebl3.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssckbi.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnssdbm3.so
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
2.7.11-1 is the security update corresponding to iceweasel 10.0.11esr-1.
unblock iceape/2.7.11-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
Version 10.0.11esr-1 is a new security update for iceweasel. Note there will be
a corresponding iceape and icedove update as well. No other changes to the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pkg-mozilla-archive-keyring
The version currently in wheeze contains an expired key. The new package only
changed the expiry info.
Please also consider making it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
10.0.10esr is a security update fixing additional window.location issues.
No debian changes, only upstream changes.
unblock iceweasel/10.0.10esr-1
--
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
2.7.10 is a security update fixing additional window.location issues.
It corresponds to iceweasel 10.0.10esr.
No debian changes, only upstream changes.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
Same as iceweasel 10.0.9esr, this is a security update (containing the
same changes as those in iceweasel).
unblock iceape/2.7.9-1
-- System Information:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the
iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will
automatically get
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security
updates for the extended support branch.
unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1
--
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll
terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove.
Now I have a question about its release/update schedule.
As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
This is a security and stability upstream update, the same as iceweasel
10.0.7esr-1. The one difference with iceweasel 10.0.7esr-1 is that this
version of
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686319
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:16:52 +0200
From: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
To: Mike Hommey mh+report...@glandium.org, 686319-d...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#686319: unblock
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 07:28:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Note one of the CVEs essentially disables webGL with mesa because of a
mesa bug that leads to security problems.
Considering the mesa bug has been fixed in 8.0.4-2 and doesn't affect
stable/stable-backports, I'm planning a 10.0.7esr-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
10.0.7esr-1 is a security/stability upstream update.
It also fixes iceweasel-l10n-all version to have an epoch so that it has
a greater version number than
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:49:41AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel as per
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01620.html
unblock
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:49:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape, as per
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01652.html
and https
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape, as per
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01652.html
and https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01620.html
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel as per
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01620.html
unblock iceweasel/10.0.6esr-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:45:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi release team,
Would you allow this patch to go in, for the reasons outlined below?
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e95cb5b98154
Same patch would need to be applied to icedove and iceape, obviously.
On Fri, Jul 27
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:30:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
Iceweasel 10.0.6esr-1 is a security update for the upstream extended support
branch. It also includes a few regression fixes and other (few) minor fixes.
Please allow it in testing.
Iceweasel transitioned to testing, thanks
Hi,
Iceweasel 10.0.6esr-1 is a security update for the upstream extended support
branch. It also includes a few regression fixes and other (few) minor fixes.
Please allow it in testing.
I'm going to upload a corresponding security update of iceape to
unstable, with the same changes, but I would
Hi,
Could you hint iceape so that it goes to testing sooner? I forgot to
bump its urgency when uploading (it is a security update release)
Thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:04:07PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:42:28PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 31/05/12 07:59, Mike Hommey wrote:
FWIW, it has been confirmed to be gcc 4.7 miscompiling. It is supposed
to be fixed in upcoming 4.7.1.
The Mozilla bug report referred to GCC PR/53516. Could you please check
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
As maintainer of such a package that pushes buildds limits, I have a
question.
Isn't memory
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi Steve,
Hey Mike,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
memory
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:18:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
Regards,
Adam
[1]
To:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 16:19:00 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
gcc-defaults (1.118) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Default to GCC 4.7 for gcc, g++, gfortran on amd64, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:16:43PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 10:41 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org (21/01/2012):
Can you please schedule a round of bin-nmus of gnome-shell and gnome-sushi
to ensure they pick up the correct
Hi,
Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what
to do next: Iceweasel 10 is due on January 30 and I would like to
promptly upload it to unstable. There is a major change coming with
Iceweasel 10: it will be supported upstream for more than 6 weeks.
The timing of this
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 04:02:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 17:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 01/11/2012 05:04 PM, in #655517, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
When using version 1.10 or later of libcairo2 (e.g. from
mozilla.debian.net's squeeze-backports
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu gxine_0.5.906-1+b3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:41:32AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 6.0
dw dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m libmozjs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 6.0
dw dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2 . ALL . -m libmozjs-dev (= 6.0)
nmu gjs_1.29.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs-dev
reassign 637195 release.debian.org
retitle 637195 nmu: iceweasel_5.0-6
thanks
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:59:07PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Package: xulrunner-5.0
Version: 5.0-6
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libnotify0.7-transition
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:17:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
severity 636514 normal
thanks
I really do not have any trust in some member of the release team filing this
kind of reports. Please think twice before doing this.
On 08/03/2011 07:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openvrml_0.18.8-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs-dev 5.0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs 5.0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu pyxpcom_1:2.0~hg20110502-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against xulrunner 5.0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Any insight from the release team
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 13 mai 2011 à 09:19 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
However, by the time wheezy is released, Firefox will have had several
new releases. And the current embedding API (gtkembedmoz) has already been
removed from
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Any insight from the release team?
What's the list of affected packages?
Most libmozjs-dev and xulrunner-dev build-rdeps. Unfortunately, I forgot
to get the list
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Any insight from the release team?
What's the list of affected packages?
Most libmozjs-dev
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:34:27PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
unstable and push the last
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+ * debian/control: Lower build depends on dpkg-dev to (= 1.13.19), which
+was the value before starting to use DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:07:35 +0100
+
nss (3.12.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:47:21PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:40:42 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:12:39PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Heya,
Le lundi 10
@@
+pyxpcom (1:0.0~hg20100212-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/postinst.in: Fix symbolic link destination, and fix the way
+it is created.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:04:50 +0100
+
+pyxpcom (1:0.0~hg20100212-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control
/debian-hacks/Add-a-2-minutes-timeout-on-automation.py-driven-test.patch 2011-01-07 14:10:28.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+From: Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org
+Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:50:20 +0100
+Subject: Add a 2 minutes timeout on automation.py-driven tests
+
+---
+ build/automation.py.in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libxml2
This release contains a security fix.
unblock libxml2/2.7.8.dfsg-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:06:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release
of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes:
- Remove the upgrade notification
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:10:27AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release
of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes:
- Remove the upgrade notification. It has too many caveats to be
useful to our users at the moment. I
Hi,
I would like to upload, shortly after testing migration, a new release
of iceweasel and iceape with the following changes:
- Remove the upgrade notification. It has too many caveats to be
useful to our users at the moment. I plead guilty to not having
cared about the issue.
- Relax build
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
The new version fixes various security issues. The diff between
the previous upstream version and this one is quite big and probably
hard to review,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
Same as for iceweasel 3.5.16-1 (bug #606651), this is mostly a security
fixes release. The additional iceape specific changes are only a few:
-
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:18:04AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm coming to this late. It sounds like dpkg has changed its behaviour
several times recently. Please can you summarise dpkg's current and
proposed use of fsync() vs sync(), and the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:22:18PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.7.7.dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it was discovered that libxml2 does not well process a malformed XPATH,
causing crash and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
3.5.14-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 2 days, but there is a
zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened
in 3.5.15-1.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
2.0.9-1 was unblocked and due to migrate in 4 days, but there is a
zero-day vulnerability fix that needed to be pushed, and that happened
in 2.0.10-1. This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nss
Following 20101006164114.gy10...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr, let's now get
libnss3 in testing.
Thanks
unblock nss/3.12.8-1
unblock nspr/4.8.6-1
-- System
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:30:41AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 23/09/10 23:45, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 23 septembre 2010 à 19:55 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a
écrit :
That's not true. libproxy can autodetect the proxy configuration from
several
places, libmozjs
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:06:56AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:37:24 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
We thus have several options:
- apply the 3 mentioned changes to 3.12.6 and update through t-p-u.
- apply the 3 mentioned changes and the upstream workaround
Hi,
Upstream (nss) release 3.12.8 yesterday. Currently, what we have in the
archive is 3.12.6 in testing and 3.12.7 in unstable.
3.12.7 has one known issue that is the main reason I kept it out of
testing so far: #592315. There is a workaround patch upstream (mozilla)
that I haven't applied
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceape
This version fixes a possible crash regression introduced in version 2.0.7,
another minor regression (one-liner fix), and an irrelevant fix (only changes
a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package iceweasel
This version fixes a possible crash regression introduced in version 3.5.12,
and another minor regression (one-liner fix). No Debian-specific changes.
-xulrunner/dist/bin, and use an RPATH. Some plugins depend on
+libxpcom.so, and dlopen() from npapi_getinfo fails unless libxpcom.so
+can be loaded too. Fixes FTBFS on hppa as a side effect.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:42:37 +0200
+
iceweasel (3.5.12-1) unstable
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[3] A question you might have at this point is: why you bother about
Chromium and not other packages?. Well, I do bother about all
packages and I'm just trying to anticipate questions I'll might be
asked as soon as
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[3] A question you might have at this point is: why you bother about
Chromium and not other packages?. Well, I do bother about all
packages and I'm just
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:17:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 17:09 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano a écrit :
On 09/08/2010 05:04 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
I think it is indeed supportable now for squeeze.
What was changed from lenny to now?
What has
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[2] Chromium or iceweasel; take your pick since backports is being
suggested as a delivery mechanism for both.
There is a difference with Iceweasel, though, in that squeeze will ship
with Iceweasel.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:19:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael Gilbert wrote:
A an option in the installer like volatile/security should address a
lot of this concern.
Unless it installs the package from backports, the most the installer
can do is eliminate one or two of the three or
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:50:11AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
So xulrunner needs to be fixed and/or nspr 4.8.6 unblocked from sid.
It will be fixed. The pkg-config files are wrong. They are unfortunately
generated using the nspr version as taken from nspr-config --version,
that is, the version
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:45:24AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Di, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:42:05 (CEST), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
checking
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Is it too late to campaign for iceweasel 3.6.8 in Squeeze?
The reason I ask is that I have never able to play flash videos in
iceweasel (under linux) without stuttering, and random freezes of
the video (but the audio continue).
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:24AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote:
Are you volunteering to make all packages depending on xulrunner and
libmozjs build and properly work with the xulrunner and libmozjs
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
to apply the attached debian changes, to both code and packaging.
If everything
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:49:21PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Hi Release Team,
In the next few days upstream will release chromium 6 in the stable
channel. This means that v5 will not receive any further (security)
update,
1 - 100 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
