On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:00:08PM +, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we (the release team, by remote participation the FTP-team, and DSA) are
> planning a sprint for entangling release from ftp-master infrastructure.
>
> Time and location would be at the debian sun camp [DSC].
>
> We have
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 07:52:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 5/6th - okay for me
Fine.
> 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon
I'm away I'm afraid.
> 19th/20th - looks okay
> 26th/27th - looks okay
>
Both work for me.
Neil
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > May 23/24
>
> Offline-ish on May 23.
>
Same for me.
> > May 30/31
>
> OK.
>
OK
> > June 6/7
>
> Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7.
>
OK
> > June 13/14
>
> Offline-ish on June 13.
>
OK
> > June 20/21
>
> OK.
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:33:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
> 10th / 11th - Fine for me
> 17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
> afternoon to Sunday afternoon
> 31st / 1st - Fine for me
>
All fine.
> 24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning, but will be afk from ear
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear lovely release team,
TL;DR:
# CVE-2014-4887
unblock wget/1.16-1
age-days 2 wget/1.16-1
wget 1.16 in unstable currently fixes CVE-2014-4887:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in G
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:38:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
> > we go for one of:
> >
> > 11/12 October
> > 18/19 October
> > 25/26 October
>
> All of these are still good for me.
>
All
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Giving ourselves the usual pre-window to get organised, some suggested
> dates would be:
>
> - June 28/29
If it's early on the 29th, that's ok. Otherwise I'll be away. I could do
it at a push though
> - July 5/6
Running a half m
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 23:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 09:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:44 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > > We are slowly starting to prepare for the
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 09:44:38PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * April 12th/13th
> * April 19th/20th (Easter)
> * April 26th/27th
> * May 3rd/4th
>
> Please reply before the 15th of March with your preferred date(s).
These are all fine by me.
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:50:27AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Our "standard" time intervals lead to us looking at point releases for
> both stable and oldstable during February.
>
> The weekend of the 1st / 2nd February is FOSDEM, so probably best avoided. :-)
> How are people fixed for:
>
>
Hi Jay,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> The release team has not yet found the time to reply to my message of
> May 6 on when they will be ready to think about the tiff transition or
> whether my plans for the transition are okay. (It is not my intention
> to be
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:01:38PM +0200, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:56:51PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16
> > June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point rele
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:33:03PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
> > But not tested - how about USB - did that ever get sorted?
>
> We have not worked on it.
>
> > How about things like wireless drivers, raid
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:07:42AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
> &
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
> so it is basically network board drivers from linux 2.6.32, and IDE
> disk support. I for instance installed it on my Dell D430, and network
> just works fin
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:07:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> So, release people: How likely is it that Hurd gets added to jessie?
> Within the next one or two months I mean, not "maybe in a years
> time". :)
>
I don't see it happening, to be honest.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Hi Marco,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:14:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Yes, but they are all trivial changes.
>
[...]
> OK, I suck as a maintainer and as a human being and I neglected my
> packages for most of the last year.
> But I'd rather move on and fix what can still be fixed.
>
[...]
>
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Pete
tags 698117 moreinfo
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 671635 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:51:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The time spent by the RM and the maintainer to prepare and accept the tpu
> upload is higher than adding a simple unblock (assum
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:26:53PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> The fix is to add missing dependency on xz-utils.
> Also a unit tests is added explicitly testing xz compressed deb.
>
This doesn't look clean due to changes in:
> --- unattended-upgrades-0.79.3/test/aptroot/var/log/apt/his
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I simply haven't included any patches with any prior version of the
> package, so I haven't needed to rely on any 1.0 or 3.0 methods for
> including a patch
>
Again, I'm going to point at the freeze policy. Specifically Rule 1.
> I
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> what's the release team opinion on fixing several "important" bugs for
> wheezy? These are problems discovered by piuparts and all have bugs
> filed long ago, usually with a sentence like "Getting the archive
> piuparts-clean
Package: freevo
Severity: grave
Hi,
Youtube-dl is about to be removed from testing. As freevo depends on it,
it is also a candidate for removal. Please let
debian-release@lists.debian.org know how you plan on handling this
issue.
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT pre
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks for looking into this bug. VCS of coin3d has a COPYING file, which
> is clearly BSD-license [1]. So this version should be packaged to fix
> the license issue properly. The current version of coin is GPL [2].
>
This does
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
Removal hint added.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tag 540512 +wheezy-ignore
Control: tag 538822 +wheezy-ignore
This is obviously not going to get fixed this time. Adding ignore tags.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:40:58PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> There has been a small discussion about dash RC bugs 538822 and 540512
> in the bts and the
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:35:16AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:54:36AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > +netgen (4.9.13.dfsg-3.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Non-maintainer upload.
>
> Have the maintainers commented on your proposed change?
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:20:56AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> If it is essential, I can make a 0.8.1-13 upload with the extra
> changelog detail against 0.8.1-11
>
Hi,
We won't accept any changes to packaging systems, and we won't review
anything without a diff. PLEASE go read
http://release.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Since my GPG key has expired, I will not be able to upload this in a
> timely fashion, so you can consider this email as a call for NMU.
>
For info, you can simply change the expiration date...
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:40:25PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> As I've stated previously, I don't believe that backporting fixes is
> really feasible. There are too many, they are mixed with
> non-security-related modifications, there would be enormous opportunity
> for error, and ongoing
Hi,
365 files changed, 23718 insertions(+), 14033 deletions(-)
This isn't something that can be reviewed, especially with the large
number of unrelated changes to (for example build system switch!) the
package.
The options remaining are:
* Backport specific fixes for the version in testing
* Re
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:41:11AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Since we'll have released by then[1], I thought it might be nice if you
> guys were to hold a talk at FOSDEM about the past release process and/or
> the upcoming one. Anyone up for that?
>
I won't be attending this year - anyone e
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:14:41PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:39:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > In meanwhile I think the debdiff is too huge to have this for an
> > unblock to wheezy. I suggest to close this request to reduce the
> > current open unblock r
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01:58PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> the discussion in RC bug #591969 ended with a call for a wheezy-ignore
> tag. The bug was also tagged squeeze-ignore. What does the release team say?
>
In general, I'm fairly loathed to add a *second* release ignore tag.
Can someon
tags 692614 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692619 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692624 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692625 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692627 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692628 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692629 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692630 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692631 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692613 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692615 + wheez
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:59:11PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> And I see nothing wrong with breaking packages in unstable, but maybe
> there too I'm mistaken.
>
Yes, as you breaking a package in unstable may:
a) Break other packages
b) Remove the ability to update via unstable if a RC bug does
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:59:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
> > We still need a pre
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Emacs 24 has been in pre-release mode
So... not actually released then.
> Anyways, this doesn't answer my question, which I've asked thrice.
> Here it goes again: is this a done deal, and we're getting an ancient
> (yes, a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
> > wheezy, that works just as well as far as I'm concerned, but I thought
> > I'd give it a chance.
>
> feel free to do so if you thi
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 07:52:18PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 11:59:07 +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Right, the delta diff was small enough that I actually put in the time
> > to look at the full diff. This took a number of hours, but anyway:
>
>
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:59:07AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
&
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:18:29PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 17:51:56 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Nope, 1.16.5. I'd like to see that to get a view as to why 1.16.5 was
> > broken. Once we've managed to have a look at that, it may give a clu
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If it's the solution that the TC decide on to resolve the issue, it
> > sounds like something we could work with, at least imho, from what I've
> > seen so far. I've CCed -release for any further comments, as I don't
> > know how
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:38:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 15:14:15 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > That is of course, your perogative. However, if you could kindly prepare
> > a patchset between 1.16.5 and whatever you want to mig
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 09:56:24PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:42:18 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Advancing that as much as you can would certainly be useful to catch any
> > errors, and to ensure translators get a chance to contribute.
>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you please make sure that mumble 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2 does not
> migrate to wheezy ? In particular, please do not accept an unblock
> request for it or for any later version.
>
I've commented out the automatic unblock it was gran
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have will be able to do so, because mumble u
[resent... signed this time. Again]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:45:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * That the package is likely to be able to communicate with
> > non-debian
> > derived distributions.
>
> The information we seem to be getting is that it is indeed likely that
> the mumble we have
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:12AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The problem with mumble and the celt codec has been referred to the TC
> - see the bug mentioned above. I would be interested to hear from the
> security and release teams.
>
I consider there to be two issues which would concern
s
decision.
Thanks,
Neil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:34:35PM -0600, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hence, I consider this bug serious and thus RC, and am reassigning to evince.
>
> Feel free to pop it over to tech-ctte if you don't agree.
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
> --
&g
severity 658139 serious
reassign 658139 evince
tags 658139 + patch
retitle 658139 missing mime entry
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:09:27AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > It does seem quite annoying. Have you considered asking the release
> > team whether they would be inclined to agree that this bu
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> the python-weblib package in Debian has recently been taken over by
> me. The package has a long-standing mis-name bug, since it should be
> called python-pyweblib to be in alignment with the python policy.
>
> Would it be possible to d
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> 2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern :
> | Hi,
> |
> | On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > | > The Fix
> | > | > Add required font package to debian/control
> | >
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > The Fix
> | > Add required font package to debian/control::Depends
> | >
> +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
> + .
> + NOTE: If you experience problems with the F1 help key, please
> + make sure you have package xfonts-100dp
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 04:22:58PM -0600, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Ansgar has been experimenting with .deb sizes to make the packages
> needed for a minimal desktop installation fit in the first CD. It looks
> like that's doable by switching to xz compression for the involved
> binaries. Would
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:18:58PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> I will file RM requests (also for unstable as I don't see how the
> situation could be resolved this way) as soon (still wating for the-me
> to be back from holidays).
If there's no r-depends, and the package is removed from unstab
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:21:29PM +0200, Frank Habermann wrote:
> > 4303 files changed, 43422 insertions(+), 12755 deletions(-)
> >
> > Can you please provide a clean patch that we can review, preferably
> > one that doesn't touch every single file.
> >
> > Additionally, do you know what
> > /t
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:11:35PM +0200, Frank Habermann wrote:
> Dear release managers,
>
> I ask for a freeze exception request for zendframework version 1.11.12-1.
>
> This version fixes security bug #679215 and is the last minor bugfix version
> of
> zendframework 1.11.
>
Hi,
4303 file
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 08:34:24AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> songwrite is currently orphaned and has an RC bug #672210. The problem is
> that the version of songwrite is much too old, in fact upstream has since
> october 2007 (!) moved from songwrite to songwrite2. IMHO, fixing #672210
> would r
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I suggest we remove libggi from Wheezy. It's totally obsolete these days,
> dead upstream and RC-buggy since 1.5 years (608981).
>
> Removing it would involve the following packages:
>
> GGI-related and to be removed along, no r
Hi Toni,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:43:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
[snip lots]
> This will at least prevent practical scim usage in Wheezy for any new
> installs. I therefore request that you re-think that course of action,
> and allow swift re-introduction of possibly stripped-down packages
[
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:45:14PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> 2012/6/27 Julien Cristau :
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am still correcting FTBFS.
> >> However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
> >> May I upload libpng 1.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Uploaded. There may be a point release with translation updates
> and potentially minor bugfixes at some point in the next month or so.
>
Great, thanks.
> > gutenprint 5.2.8
> > This is a point release with a large number of new p
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:06:12PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> > I have no preference either way, as long as the package complies with
> > release
> > policy, then it may be included in the release.
> >
> Your answer isn't very helpfull to me as it is. So I have some
> questions:
I
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:02:28AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> ocl-icd is small and the core code should not change a lot until
> OpenCL 1.3 or more appears. The core code of the version already in
> testing is very similar to the one waiting in NEW.
>
In that case, hopefully it will be pro
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:05:26PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16:07AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We know no-one likes reading long mails on d-d-a, so we'll keep this
> > short: we'll be stopping automatic
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> as already explained by Jordi, there’s one big remaining bit for GNOME
> in wheezy: GDM. Currently it is stuck at version 3.0 (mostly because I
> didn’t have enough time to work on it), and version 3.4 should be
> hopefully ready f
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:04:29AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Claws Mail upstream has also set a release date for the next version [0],
> which will be on 27 June.
>
Hi,
That would be cutting it very fine. If you are happy to maintain the
snapshot for the length of a stable release, I would
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Sylpheed upstream has published a release plan for next Sylpheed stable
> version, 3.2 [0] and the release it's planned for next 29 June.
>
> If possible, I would like to have this version instead of cur
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:00:50AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Still, Karolin Seeger, the Samba release manager, announce recently in
> the samba-technical mailign list tjhat the 3.6.6 release is due out
> for July 2nd.
>
Hi,
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening i
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:32:20AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'm planning to upload dpkg 1.16.5 to unstable on the 26th, to be able
> to finish cleaning up some pending changes I've locally and to give
> some time for the initial wave of translation updates once I've sent
> the call. Given that
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:09:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> warzone2100 3.1 beta 11 was released today and I would like it and
> future 3.1 versions to enter wheezy. 3.1 is the culmination of a year's
> work and brings some important improvements (like deterministic network
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does
> in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev
> package is missing a dependency that makes building against the
> library impossible. The change
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> I want to ask if the release team decided anything in this direction.
> Does the release team want a useful version of the package in wheezy?
>
> I'm not interested in any discussion but a plain offical statement from
> the Re
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution
> > indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of
> > users and contributors w
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 06:08:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in
> >either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct me if I'm
> >mistaken on that.
>
> Anyone? :-)
>
> Op
press says OK :)
Neil
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:11:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> press@ / -live *gentle poke*
>
> fwiw, the BSP weekend (12/13th) is looking a likely candidate currently.
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 6.0.5 is somewhat overdue
I'm not free on the 25th, 3rd (daytime) and 10th/11th will be sporadic.
Others in press may be available :)
Neil
(Press hat)
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:11:46PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 25-26/2 - Steve's not available for CDs
>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:22:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Are you a new member of the release team? If so, then I'm happy there
> are much needed new members! :)
>
For reference, Adam as been one of the Release *Managers* for over a
year now.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks t
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 01:14:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> To get a fuller picture, what are the changes being made to each of
> the files in question and when/where are they being made? You
> mentioned earlier that cleaning the package would lead to changes
> being made - it sounds like t
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:16:59AM +0200, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I'd like to have a sit down with relevant people to work out how we can
> improve d-i and debian-cd handling for the next release. Please indicate
> your availability at:
> http://www.doodle.com/x2kit5h9zurfk6ss
>
Hi,
I'd like to have a sit down with relevant people to work out how we can
improve d-i and debian-cd handling for the next release. Please indicate
your availability at:
http://www.doodle.com/x2kit5h9zurfk6ss
Thanks,
Neil
--
< vorlon> We need a fresher website - WordPress is the perfect solutio
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 01:23:51PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> May I also ask if the idea of a 2-year fixed cycle freeze is still in
> place (is valid) or has been reviewed and then discarded?
>
The current plan is that we will try the fixed release date for the
coming release, and see how it goes.
nterpretation of that announcement, and its applicability now, but
despite that I do acknowledge it may be useful to provide a confirmation.
Thus, you can take this as confirmation that there is no current plan to
support 5.0 to 7.0 upgrades, unless we release by February 2012. As we
are due t
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Sprint
> --
> We feel it would be useful for the Release Team as a whole to get
> together to think about what the plans are for the next release. As
> such, we're planning a sprint to meet in person. Detail
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58:24PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > We don't have faster hardware.
> > We think of a too slow thing in a question
>
> A test of gcc of sh4 takes time.
> When there is not a test, a package is done in about two days.
>
> How does sh4 become targeted for the r
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:02:18AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> The package which time needs most is GCC. GCC takes about 6 days.
Ouch! That doesn't sound supportable to be honest. Do you have faster
hardware?
Neil
--
So we can expect stockholm to be elected in 2009?
isnt the world own3d
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:45:58AM -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> >> diffstat: 61 files changed, 1502 insertions(+), 657 deletions(-)
> >> Is all of that necessary to fix the security issues?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > However, I do not have th
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy :
> > On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote:
> >>
> >> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this
> >> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0
> >> (squeeze).
> >
Hia,
I'm currently wondering why #598135 is RC. Would someone care to
explain what I'm missing? :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
[local irc server has just been brought up]
suddenly there's quite some silence in the hacklab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi Peter, thanks for getting in touch
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Thanks for your efforts towards great Debian releases!
>
> I've made some
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch
> for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad
> about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x
> branch is in a v
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Neil,
>
> On Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 09:49:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > 3) Remove the package from squeeze
>
> did you had a look at it's r-depends? Removing is not an option.
>
I should hav
Hi Bernd,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Give it more time for testing in unstable then.
That's one of the things that's being considered, if you'd carefully
read the thread.
> Virtualbox is important enough to have the latest version of it in the
> next release
Hi Michael, thanks for getting in touch.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> The only part of your email that I do not agree with is the part about
> removing. Yes, it's not easily possible, but I don't understand why this is
> even considered.
>
Just on this point,
the "this week in Debian" podcast. It was
> fun. I wish I was living in Cambridge with 9 other DDs, I feel alone
> here in Shanghai (lucky, Li Daobing lives here now)! :)
>
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Firstly, please accept my apologies for
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:25:52PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Can we move forward and discuss what should be done now, rather than
> > discussing the past?
> >
> > Thomas
>
> It's been more than 10 days, and I still have no answer to what I will
> be allowed to chang
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:30:03PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please could a freeze exception be made for roxterm 1.18.5-3 which fixes
> bug 598971. Although there are no reported symptoms in Debian the faulty
> code contributed to quite a serious problem in Ubuntu ie a terminal
> emula
1 - 100 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
