redundant?
I haven't looked at the specific patches that were cherry-picked, but
yes, the older patch was for a specific model while the more general one
was made later. No harm in having the device-specific patch applied, it
simply becomes redundant.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The conte
On So, 2010-11-07 at 22:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:39 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:46:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly
> > wrote:
> >
> > > If 1.0 + bug fixes is not acceptable for Debian Squeeze, then I suggest
>
backport of SyncEvolution.
FWIW, I still think that 1.0 + bug fixes is the better choice for
Squeeze. It has been in use for a while now and arguably is better than
beta 2, with no known regressions whatsoever.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opini
that we consider as the stable one.
> I suppose the diff between upstream versions is pretty enormous, but
> there are a lot of bugs fixed.
Well, we don't stand still ;-}
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee o
4 matches
Mail list logo
