Re: Update Lenny to Squeeze

Hi, On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:00 +0200, Michel wrote: This information belongs in the release notes. I'm not sure where one should look to see the draft release notes for the next release. I guess its already known: #549573 Its

Update to libmowgli

Hi, I know I'm late but unfortunately live kept me busy in the last months. Now I want to update libmowgli in sid to the version (+ some smaller packaging changes) which has been sitting in experimental for quiet some time now. It would require the rebuild of two packages: mcs audacious It

Bug#566264: RM: libclass-dbi-loader-relationship-perl/oldstable -- RoQA; License problems

Hi Philipp, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:02PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:27:47PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: Its kind of unfortune that this removal will remove other packages as well (and affect packages which do have users) but I think we simply *can

irssi-plugin-silc unusable in Debian Lenny and embedded code copy

Hi, recently I've noticed that irssi-plugin-silc does not work with the irssi in Lenny. The problem is that it segfaults when used with the irssi version in Lenny. There is also a bug report for this on [1]. Because a group of people, which I'm part of, wanted to migrate from an IRC channel to

Re: Unblock request for mantis

Hi, On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:47:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Please upload and tell us when you did. mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED [1]. This is just a take experimental package and upload it to unstable upload. Thanks and best Regards, Patrick [1]

Re: Unblock request for smstools (was: Fwd: Accepted smstools 3.1-2 (source i386))

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:29:25PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Please hint it (3.1-2) into Testing. Unblocked. Thanks. Best Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Unblock request for smstools (was: Fwd: Accepted smstools 3.1-2 (source i386))

Hi, I've uploaded a new version of smstools 3.1 to unstable in order to fix a bug with a severity important. Please hint it (3.1-2) into Testing. Best Regards, Patrick - Forwarded message from Patrick Schoenfeld schoenf...@in-medias-res.com - From: Patrick Schoenfeld schoenf

Consider tagging #502858 lenny-ignore (was: Re: aptitude: changelog entry malformed)

(CC'ing debian-release because their input makes sense..) Hi, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: On 08/10/20 22:04 +1100, Ben Finney said ... Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.11.9-1lenny1 Severity: serious Justification: violates Policy §4.4 This part of the policy is a should and not a must.

Re: Consider tagging #502858 lenny-ignore (was: Re: aptitude: changelog entry malformed)

Hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:08:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: How about just fixing that changelog entry instead of having this discussion? Or am I missing something here that makes the fix not an extremely trivial one? It does seem a trivial fix to me, but only for a specific class

bacula probably needs unblocking

Hi, today I was diving through the list of rc bugs and stumbled across #496174. Appearently there has been an unblock request by luk for version 2.4.2-3 of this package. But in the meantime there has been an upload 2.4.2-3.1. Additional to that I would like to note, that the changelog of 2.4.2-3

Unblock request for mantis and request for comments

Hi, thanks for hinting the last uploads into lenny w/o me requesting it. This time I don't want to miss asking for unblock. Because of security issue #502728, I've prepared an update to the mantis package. Unfortunately the took me two uploads (because a bug introduced by the patch slipped

mantis in lenny

Hello Release team, the current stable release of mantis is 1.1.2. This is the result of my endeavors to get a stabilized mantis upstream version, suitable for lenny. It took some months to get there, so I really would like to see this piece of work in mantis. Additional it could be expected that

Re: Is mantis still not supportable by the support team? (was: Re: Unblock request for mantis)

Hi Moritz, sorry for my late reply; I wanted to confer with Thijs on this first, because we were in contact on this earlier already and also I wanted to act before replying. On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:31:47PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: We're swamped in email. I understand that. Sorry if

Unblock request for mantis (was: Re: Is mantis still not supportable by the support team? (was: Re: Unblock request for mantis))

. Thanks in advance, Best Regards Patrick On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:05:23PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: So given the current situation could the security team please consider supporting mantis in the upcoming release of lenny? Yes, we can do that. Cheers

Is mantis still not supportable by the support team? (was: Re: Unblock request for mantis)

the past are still true. Thanks and best Regards Patrick Schoenfeld Mantis Maintainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Unblock request for mantis

. If that is not wanted I would like to kindly ask for a reason why. Thanks in advance and Best Regards, Patrick (Full Quote below as a remainder for the previous email) Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: (At first I sent this one private to aba, because he set the blocking request, but this seems not to make much sense

Unblock request for mantis

(At first I sent this one private to aba, because he set the blocking request, but this seems not to make much sense, so this is now going were it should go) Hi, during pre-etch times the security team requested not to include mantis in Etch, because it had a bad security- (and packaging)