On Sun 14 Apr 2019, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> Apologies for having let this slip off the radar a little.
NP
> I just flagged the current upload to be rejected. Please re-build the
> package with "stretch" in the changelog rather than "stretch-security",
> and feel free to go ahead with the re-
On Wed 03 Apr 2019, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > There doesn't appear to be an uploaded version anywhere that I can see.
>
> This now happened, but
>
> > Please attach a source debdiff to this report.
>
> this hasn't. If it had, I'd have asked you to rebuild the package so the
> changelog did
On Sun 31 Mar 2019, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> Because:
>
> Mar 15 10:54:14 /rsync_3.1.2-1+deb9u2_amd64.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG
> signature!
Damn, as this had to be built on a stretch system I had my old key on there :(
Re-signed, and re-uploaded.
Paul
On Fri 15 Mar 2019, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/03/2019 11:35, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package rsyn
n/changelog2019-01-26 13:05:25.0 +0100
+++ rsync-3.1.3/debian/changelog2019-03-15 11:25:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+rsync (3.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Apply CVEs from 2016 to the zlib code.
+closes:#924509
+
+ -- Paul Slootman Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:25:0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
There are a couple of CVEs that have been fixed by 3.1.2-1+deb9u2.
After discussing this with a member of the security team it was not
considered important enough to warrant a DSA,
+}
Changelog entry:
rsync (3.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Added patch for CVE-2014-9512, Rsync path spoofing attack vulnerability.
closes:#778333
-- Paul Slootman Sat, 07 Mar 2015 15:45:05 +0100
unblock rsync/3.1.1-3
This version is also signed with my new GPG key.
Thanks,
Paul
cceeded (silly, I know...).
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed 04 May 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Paul Slootman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 12:30]:
> > The version already in unstable (2.6.4-4) has some other quite important
> > fixes, however that didn't make it to sarge yet (2.6.4-2 is currently in
> > sarge). Here are
an/patches/
in the source package:
- fix for sending a single file with -H
- improper handling of --one-file-system in some cases
- --link-dest / --hard-links problem
- new hard-links in not-yet-created directories
What priority should I give the -5 upload, and to what distribu
On Wed 01 Dec 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Paul Slootman wrote:
> > Maybe you should have looked better. Vincent asked for the compiles,
> > and I compiled the following for him (look in ~vincent/INCOMING on
> > master):
>
> I hadn't even looked at
On Wed 01 Dec 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> I just uploaded alpha versions of nfs-server, netkit-telnet & friends,
> and bind. I'll try to get some sparc builds going as well.
>
> Wichert (disappointed nobody else recompiled anything while this list
> has been out there for 2 weeks now).
May
12 matches
Mail list logo
