broken (linux-)i386 dependencies
prevent migration.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5389d644.4090...@debian.org
just the two metapackages from src:meta-gnome3 that
need changes, or is there anything else?
http://lists.debian.org/53863f46.2050...@pyro.eu.org
There's that and also #749888.
Do you plan an upload for #749888 anytime soon?
If not, I'll prepare an NMU.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
as answer.
If that's not the case, then I think it'd be much better to change Architecture
field instead so that it's only built on archs where it's actually supported.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 31/05/14 17:51, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting in the future.
Why?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
?
Unfortunately I cannot answer them myself, because I'm not familiar with GNOME
development procedures, nor with the implied commitments that come with them.
It would be very nice if the GNOME maintainers can cast some light on this.
Thanks in advance,
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538a079e.8050...@debian.org
satisfied when it comes to GNOME on non-Linux ports.
I take note that's no longer the case and will drop the list from CC in
future mails regarding this issue.
Apologies for any inconvenience this missunderstanding may have caused.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
admit this might break the schedule for UPower releases and thus not
be a
feasible solution from the perspective of UPower maintenance.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
stdint.h or something like that, no?
Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
sys/types.h on FreeBSD,
so their code often doesn't include stdint.h).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
On 22/05/14 19:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
sys/types.h on FreeBSD,
so their code often doesn't include stdint.h).
Thanks for this information... but again I'm
in this package, so that it isn't provided as
an uninstallable on non-Linux ports.
Many thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
On 04/05/14 13:40, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture in gnome-shell ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#733122
#735023
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of kfreebsd-any
On 04/05/14 13:33, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of kfreebsd-any
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package is Linux-specific (and as of 3.8.4-8.1 properly marked as
such).
Please could remove associated binaries from the archive?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing so:
#733122
#735023
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package is Linux-specific (and as of 3.8.4-8.1 properly marked as
such).
Please could remove associated binaries from the archive?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing so:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
On 11/05/14 21:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 17:37:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of kfreebsd-any (and hurd-any
as per porter's request) from Architecture. A debdiff is attached.
Do you plan on also handling the reverse dependencies
Please could you remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur gdm3-3.8.4.old/debian/control gdm3-3.8.4/debian/control
--- gdm3
Please could you remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture in gnome-shell ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#733122
#735023
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur gnome-shell-3.8.4.old/debian/control gnome-shell-3.8.4/debian/control
. There are specific
reasons why GNOME can't be considered a portable program. I think they're enough
well-known so that I shouldn't need to publicize them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
.
~~~
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5304dcb3.5000...@debian.org
On 19/02/2014 16:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-02-19):
After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which
has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself
On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
successful build of u-boot on kfreebsd since mid-2012...
The short
replaced by monolithic culture. I think this is a poor approach to
system
design, but as I don't use GNOME myself and GNU/kFreeBSD users have plenty of
alternatives, I don't mean to argue with anyone about it (neither GNOME
upstream,
nor the Debian GNOME maintainers).
--
Robert Millan
.
Thanks. We'll discuss this among ourselves and present a proposal.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52fd511d.8010...@debian.org
Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers haven't
responded so far.
What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 01/02/2014 19:42, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Control: forcemerge 708697 736608
Ah, I filed a duplicate bug for this by mistake, and already submitted a
patch: http://bugs.debian.org/736608
My bad...
A. Maitland, please use Steven's patch, it is more complete than mine.
--
Robert Millan
unconditionally (see qthid.pro and
hidraw.c).
Here's a patch which fixes the build problem by reverting the old behaviour on
non-Linux platforms.
Note: please respond as soon as possible, as this problem blocks the
freebsd-libs
transition.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur qthid-fcd-controller-4.1
important.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ea6e74.9040...@debian.org
years, I have a hard time
believing either consolekit or logind are the only option if you want to
implement a display manager.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
. This is much needed IMHO. Please let us know what you think.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e97c81.8020...@debian.org
support to remain mandatory (but deprecated) for one
more release cycle.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e98365.6050...@debian.org
* Disable VIA hardware RNG by default. Use hw.nehemiah_rng_enable
sysctl to re-enable (but read about the security implications
first). (Closes: #735448)
* Apply upstream EN-14_02.mmap patch.
* Fix lseek ENXIO error condition with ZFS. (Closes: #736198)
-- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Mon
On 27/01/2014 17:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
On 2014-01-27 15:32, Robert Millan wrote:
Please can we have your permission to update kfreebsd-9 in wheezy?
-10+deb70.6 fixes a security problem and two other grave bugs:
kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.6) stable
On 20/01/2014 11:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 22:44:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
There are a couple of ABI changes coming
be to ensure that nobody, ever,
disables a testsuite on kfreebsd. Many packages run a testsuite without making
100% completion mandatory (I think of GCC as an example). I think it would
be reasonable to accept this in cases where they've proven to be more of a
problem than a solution?
--
Robert Millan
On 12/01/2014 13:52, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick kick the tires
implementation
since.
Okay, perhaps you could follow up on the bug with that information and
ask if it is still an issue?
Done.
(I'll reply to the remaining bits in a separate mail)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52d1c159.3020...@debian.org
On 11/01/2014 22:54, Robert Millan wrote:
Do you have an idea of the consequences of making it linux-only? If it
is just using (e.g.) xdm instead of and kFreeBSD losing a couple of
packages, it will probably not be much of an issue. But then, I assume
that GNOME and GDM are not tightly
On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
is on kFreeBSD (vs. where
requires is
implementation-defined and can change every day, without notice. When this
creates new problems, who will debug them?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Any thoughts about this? The new release is getting closer (10.0-RC3 is already
overdue by a few days).
On 06/11/2013 22:44, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
There are a couple of ABI
.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52af7f88.50...@debian.org
the kFreeBSD port is perfectly capable of
meeting these requirements. The system is quite robust already, in fact
I've used it in production environments several times (including
infrastructure for a major corporation which will remain unnamed), with
very satisfactory results.
--
Robert Millan
and s390(x) are
being removed.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52988904.6030...@debian.org
Michael Biebl:
TTBOMK there is no working 3D support on kfreebsd which would allow
to run GNOME Shell on kfreebsd
Can you be more specific? AFAIK we've got a working OpenGL implementation.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Michael Biebl:
Am 11.10.2013 23:56, schrieb Robert Millan:
Michael Biebl:
TTBOMK there is no working 3D support on kfreebsd which would allow
to run GNOME Shell on kfreebsd
Can you be more specific? AFAIK we've got a working OpenGL implementation.
I asked repeatedly if someone was running
really work.
.4 just went into proposed-updates. Does this address your concerns?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5255c37d.8040
after the window for 7.2 closed.
Uhm sorry then, I got confused by e1vtrz5-0001cf...@franck.debian.org
which said otherwise.
Does this address your concerns?
Yes, thanks. Please feel free to upload; the package will then be
processed after the point release.
Fine. Thank you!
--
Robert Millan
handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
kfreebsd-defaults should not provide kfreebsd-headers-* metapackages on
linux.
I just uploaded 9+2 without them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
version of the package. That's obviously not ideal for
something that's going to want to migrate on a fairly regular basis.
We make it kfreebsd-any then?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Adam D. Barratt:
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
It'd need a force-hint, which says ignore any installability issues
===
--- debian/changelog (revision 4994)
+++ debian/changelog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.5) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Disable 101_nullfs_vsock.diff. (Closes: #71)
+
+ -- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Sun, 15
assistance with arch-related bugs
I am a DD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/kFreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlI13MkACgkQC19io6rUCv8GMACeKRjp4MDexIdVzc/joKteIGls
uYYAnRytlsjLDkj8ygs2vbx8GNpg9BHk
=xor2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
2013/8/2 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
[Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
Hi Steven,
Yes, I've seen it. Unfortunately I had already uploaded by then. Sorry :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
.
--
Robert Millan
grub_kfreebsd.diff
Description: Binary data
2013/7/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Thanks; please go ahead.
Uploaded. Thank you.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
for details.
There's a very simple fix, cherry-picked from upstream.
--
Robert Millan
grub_kfreebsd.diff
Description: Binary data
is
preferred. Hopefully I can even apply this, if memory serves ;-)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
+
+ * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
+(Closes: #712816)
+
+ -- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:56:56 +0200
+
kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3) unstable; urgency=high
* Split versioned packages to make it possible to install multiple
diff -Nru kfreebsd
,
see #621890).
An ABI bump was triggered by the second fix.
kfreebsd-9 (9.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /boot symlink kludge. (Closes: #672255)
* fix_VOP_VPTOCNP_bypass_for_nullfs.diff: Fix /proc/self/exe in
nullfs. (Closes: #682291, #681594)
-- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Sat
2012/8/3 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Given all of the above, we should consider whether this should wait until
after the release.
What about #683562? (still not fixed)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
2012/7/5 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
I guessed that this (and other low-severity bugs) were flagged like this
simply because they are usertagged with 'kfreebsd'? In which case that
may be a bit OTT.
Oh, I see
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
for kfreebsd-* to qualify as release
architectures.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxpb+hdbphhv4xbjswdxgggakjrz3t57yy5lymvjhyn
chroots? If not, is it feasible to add them?
Would then asdfasdf qualify as porter box for kfreebsd-i386?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmuq9fnklyktqbpwih0_unou6jbtp8eh+cg0qtokmu...@mail.gmail.com
2012/4/22 Robert Millan r...@debian.org:
I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency
part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new
packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 =
2.13-31.
VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The hurd-i386 buildd isn't keeping up, so 8.2-11 hurd-i386 builds
haven't been replaced with 8.3-1.
This prevents automated removal of kfreebsd-source-8.2 from unstable,
which I believe is what is currently preventing migration of 8.3-1 to
testing.
--
it so the package be NMUed.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
setclock.diff
Description: Binary data
.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmxpmzu1gv_z+bdoq_ooxsm+d3qc3gui-esrnrwfyx...@mail.gmail.com
2012 20:45, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
# Bug 654783 cloned as bug 669281
tag 669281 patch
retitle 654783 race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7
testsuite
severity 654783 wishlist
reassign 654783 libc0.1
thanks
Hi,
It seems that outdated python2.7
. The last package keeping the old libraries in
testing now is mednafen, which was mising a build; that's now been uploaded
so hopefully we should be able to get this finished with tonight's britney
run.
Very nice, thanks a lot for your help patience.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, perhaps it'd make sense to force
migration of those two packages? In both cases the majority of
changes in update have been tested in unstable for more than 10 days
already.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
to document this in the patch header (maybe this avoids
repeating this discussion FWIW).
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
That rather depends
patches in this kind of situations
(c.f. k3b).
Anyway, thanks for supplying a fix.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
of ifconfig breaks D-I
- Uploaded fix currently in NEW, expect RSN.
660396: sane-backends: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
- (kfreebsd-kernel-headers bug) Fixed today in 0.75. BinNMU?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +, Robert Millan wrote:
660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
- Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
binaries from testing. See
http
in the other mail a k-k-h update is required)
fwiw, there's a possibility that vlc might be a blocker, given that the
new upstream version is FTBFS on multiple architectures (including
kfreebsd-*).
I'll have a look.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
-libs. I
believe freebsd-buildutils 9.0-6 should now build on Linux-based
systems, but I still have no feedback from the buildds. I'd
appreciate if someone can confirm, as I don't have a GNU/Linux system
at hand atm.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
(filed as #659622).
colord:
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659624).
libimobiledevice
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659625).
libisoburn:
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659621).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
FYI after freebsd-libs 8.3 has migrated to testing, freebsd-libs 9.0
has been uploaded to unstable.
-release: Please can you take appropiate measures to begin the transition?
El 29 de gener de 2012 14:43, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
[ Please CC me, not subscribed! ]
Hi!
We have
Hi Adam,
El 4 de febrer de 2012 19:44, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk ha escrit:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:09 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Should we wait until the current transition is
over, or upload to unstable
[ Please CC me, not subscribed! ]
Hi!
We have an incoming soname bump in freebsd-libs (libusb, libusbhid,
libcam and libsbuf). Should we wait until the current transition is
over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as soon as possible?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfsutils
Will this prevent migration?
--
Robert Millan
2011/12/11 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
See NBS on http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
If you are in a hurry and can't wait for the semi-automatic decruft
sessions, file a bug to get them removed.
Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I believe manual removal of kfreebsd-* binaries from testing is needed
so that gpe-shield can migrate (if that's not the case then sorry for
bothering)
For details, see http://bugs.debian.org/647655
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
2011/12/4 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:13:24 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
I believe manual removal of kfreebsd-* binaries from testing is needed
so that gpe-shield can migrate (if that's not the case then sorry for
bothering)
For details, see http
this for kfreebsd-10
(being uploaded as I write).
For kfreebsd-9 maybe it's better to wait a few days since it'll have
to go through NEW soon (upstream 9.0 release).
And for kfreebsd-8 it would interfere with TERM=xterm transition (see
#647672), I'd rather not touch it for now.
--
Robert Millan
2011/10/23 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net:
[kfreebsd] waitpid from threads problem
[...]
[kfreebsd] thread-related hangs
FYI Petr has been working on a cleaner solution from Glibc side, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/09/msg00072.html
--
Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
verify earlier than that).
What's the status
part of a Debian release.
However, it's not the cause for this problem (see my other mail). In
fact it's probably harmless, and it's gone with 8.2 anyway. I
wouldn't worry about them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
,
given the increasingly short period of time we have remaining until the
point release is scheduled.
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
verify earlier than that).
--
Robert Millan
Index: debian/kfreebsd
don't happen on my arch
(kfreebsd-amd64), as they're i386-specific. I admit I should have
checked both.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
dinstall.
I notice they've been installed. Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxp4a4aqrc7-hwqr-krskhjrbkjehrsvj3uaflmszpf
.
I've uploaded a BinNMU for both packages.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPW77aouTqOvyC=vpfjhhvmvpg53+eg0npoioy6t4
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze
point release closes over this weekend.
Uploaded.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze
point release closes over this weekend.
Uploaded
. Given your
reply, now I assume it does.
Might it not make more
sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4?
Sure, we can get back to this later.
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
