are being satisfied when it comes to GNOME on non-Linux ports.
I take note that's no longer the case and will drop the list from CC in
future mails regarding this issue.
Apologies for any inconvenience this missunderstanding may have caused.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
bug=735023#10
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/538a079e.8050...@debian.org
hat the resulting package will be usable?
Unfortunately I cannot answer them myself, because I'm not familiar with GNOME
development procedures, nor with the implied commitments that come with them.
It would be very nice if the GNOME maintainers can cast some light on this.
Thanks in advance,
-
On 31/05/14 17:51, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting in the future.
Why?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
s" as answer.
If that's not the case, then I think it'd be much better to change Architecture
field instead so that it's only built on archs where it's actually supported.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
x27;s just the two metapackages from src:meta-gnome3 that
need changes, or is there anything else?
http://lists.debian.org/53863f46.2050...@pyro.eu.org
There's that and also #749888.
Do you plan an upload for #749888 anytime soon?
If not, I'll prepare an NMU.
--
Robert Millan
--
only broken (linux-)i386 dependencies
prevent migration.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5389d644.4090...@debian.org
On 22/05/14 19:37, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:18:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
on FreeBSD,
>so their code often doesn't include ).
Thanks for this information... but again I'
ke a missing #include or something like that, no?
Yes. This is a typical porting issue (uintXX_t types are defined by
on FreeBSD,
so their code often doesn't include ).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
ic extensions is complete for that release.
However I admit this might break the schedule for UPower releases and thus not
be a
feasible solution from the perspective of UPower maintenance.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
in this package, so that it isn't provided as
an uninstallable on non-Linux ports.
Many thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://l
On 11/05/14 21:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 17:37:29 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of "kfreebsd-any" (and "hurd-any"
as per porter's request) from Architecture. A debdiff is attached.
Do you pla
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package is Linux-specific (and as of 3.8.4-8.1 properly marked as
such).
Please could remove associated binaries from the archive?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing so:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package is Linux-specific (and as of 3.8.4-8.1 properly marked as
such).
Please could remove associated binaries from the archive?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing so:
#733122
#735023
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To
On 04/05/14 13:33, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU with the remov
On 04/05/14 13:40, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gnome-shell ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#733122
#735023
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU with the removal of &quo
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gnome-shell ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#733122
#735023
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur gnome-shell-3.8.4.old/debian/control gnome-shell-3.8.4/debi
Please could you remove "kfreebsd-any" from Architecture in gdm3 ?
You may close the following RC bugs when doing this:
#602724
#601106
#612157
#733546
A patch is attached for your convenience.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur gdm3-3.8.4.old/debian/control gdm3-3.8.4/debi
t parts of it.
I don't think it's possible to put this in generic wording. There are specific
reasons why GNOME can't be considered a portable program. I think they're enough
well-known so that I shouldn't need to publicize them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On 19/02/2014 16:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Robert Millan (2014-02-19):
>> After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which
>> has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself:
>>
>> ~
ontinue providing porting assistance for them.
~~~~~~~
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5304dcb3.5000...@debian.org
On 18/02/2014 21:54, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:35:09PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 18/02/2014 19:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> Looking for help from the *bsd porters on this... We haven't seen a
>>> successful build of u
one thing and do it
well"
is being replaced by monolithic culture. I think this is a poor approach to
system
design, but as I don't use GNOME myself and GNU/kFreeBSD users have plenty of
alternatives, I don't mean to argue with anyone about it (neither GNOME
upstream,
nor the
ision on init systems, Linux will be using systemd as default init
> system[3]. I presume kFreeBSD will go with a different init system.
Thanks. We'll discuss this among ourselves and present a proposal.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.d
Unless I missed something, only two packages remain. And the maintainers haven't
responded so far.
What would be a suitable delay for delayed-queue NMUs?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On 01/02/2014 19:42, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Control: forcemerge 708697 736608
>
> Ah, I filed a duplicate bug for this by mistake, and already submitted a
> patch: http://bugs.debian.org/736608
My bad...
A. Maitland, please use Steven's patch, it is more complete than
budev unconditionally (see qthid.pro and
hidraw.c).
Here's a patch which fixes the build problem by reverting the old behaviour on
non-Linux platforms.
Note: please respond as soon as possible, as this problem blocks the
freebsd-libs
transition.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
diff -ur qthid-fcd-cont
or the last 25 years, I have a hard time
believing either consolekit or logind are the only option if you want to
implement a display manager.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
hich I believe is the most important.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ea6e74.9040...@debian.org
plan
is for sysvinit support to remain mandatory (but deprecated) for one
more release cycle.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.de
reeBSD for Jessie.
Sure. This is much needed IMHO. Please let us know what you think.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e97c81.8020...@debian.org
On 27/01/2014 17:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo
>
> On 2014-01-27 15:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Please can we have your permission to update kfreebsd-9 in wheezy?
>> -10+deb70.6 fixes a security problem and two other grave bugs:
>>
&g
* Disable VIA hardware RNG by default. Use hw.nehemiah_rng_enable
sysctl to re-enable (but read about the security implications
first). (Closes: #735448)
* Apply upstream EN-14_02.mmap patch.
* Fix lseek ENXIO error condition with ZFS. (Closes: #736198)
-- Robert Millan Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16
On 20/01/2014 11:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 22:44:53 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transi
On 12/01/2014 13:52, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
>> For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
>> general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
>> soon, however this is clearly
ng the actual program itself.
I think a good step in that direction would be to ensure that nobody, ever,
disables a testsuite on kfreebsd. Many packages run a testsuite without making
100% completion mandatory (I think of GCC as an example). I think it would
be reasonable to accept this in cases where they've proven to be more of a
problem than a solution?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52d28c2c.8050...@debian.org
On 11/01/2014 22:54, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Do you have an idea of the consequences of making it linux-only? If it
>> is just using (e.g.) xdm instead of and kFreeBSD losing a couple of
>> packages, it will probably not be much of an issue. But then, I assume
>> th
his kind of work.
[1] If the reason it is RC is that it causes FTBFS (and serious buildd grief),
I think http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734290#10 is a
good solution in that regard.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52d1c159.3020...@debian.org
though,
so
please don't take my word on it.
I'll followup on this.
>> #649196 is probably not an issue anymore. We've replaced our thread
>> implementation
>> since.
>>
>
> Okay, perhaps you could follow up on the bug with that information and
>
7;t conform to any
standard or specification. The definition of "systemd APIs GDM requires" is
implementation-defined and can change every day, without notice. When this
creates new problems, who will debug them?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l
On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
>>> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly whe
Any thoughts about this? The new release is getting closer (10.0-RC3 is already
overdue by a few days).
On 06/11/2013 22:44, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> There a
a on where
we stand regarding GNOME.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52af7f88.50...@debian.org
#x27;. I.e. normal QA requirements are no longer
waived because of preview status.
If that is the case, I think the kFreeBSD port is perfectly capable of
meeting these requirements. The system is quite robust already, in fact
I've used it in production environments several times (including
infrast
nstall base" is, but if
it's lower than 129 then I'm sorry to hear that mipsel and s390(x) are
being removed.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52988904.6030...@debian.org
uot;libusb3";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libusb2debian.*/ | .depends ~ /libusb3.*/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libusb3.*/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libusb2debian.*/;
title = "libkvm6";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libkvm0.*/ | .depends ~ /libkvm6.*/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libkvm6.*/;
is_bad = .d
Michael Biebl:
> Am 11.10.2013 23:56, schrieb Robert Millan:
>> Michael Biebl:
>>> TTBOMK there is no working 3D support on kfreebsd which would allow
>>> to run GNOME Shell on kfreebsd
>>
>> Can you be more specific? AFAIK we've got a working OpenG
Michael Biebl:
> TTBOMK there is no working 3D support on kfreebsd which would allow
> to run GNOME Shell on kfreebsd
Can you be more specific? AFAIK we've got a working OpenGL implementation.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
ut it's _not_ in proposed-updates because
> it reached pu-NEW after the window for 7.2 closed.
Uhm sorry then, I got confused by
which said otherwise.
>> Does this address your concerns?
>
> Yes, thanks. Please feel free to upload; the package will then be
> processed a
en going to appear via security doesn't really work.
.4 just went into proposed-updates. Does this address your concerns?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Adam D. Barratt:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 20:00 +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt:
>>>> I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
>
is source package" and only applies to the
> particular version of the package. That's obviously not ideal for
> something that's going to want to migrate on a fairly regular basis.
We make it kfreebsd-any then?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-re
on, and therefore doesn't allow it.
I guess this part will require manual handling by -release? (CCing)
Otherwise we'd have to make those packages kfreebsd-any...
> kfreebsd-defaults should not provide kfreebsd-headers-* metapackages on
> linux.
I just uploaded 9+2 without
===
--- debian/changelog (revision 4994)
+++ debian/changelog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.5) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Disable 101_nullfs_vsock.diff. (Closes: #71)
+
+ -- Robert Millan Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:43
assistance with arch-related bugs
I am a DD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/kFreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlI13MkACgkQC19io6rUCv8GMACeKRjp4MDexIdVzc/joKteIGls
uYYAnRytlsjLDkj8ygs2vbx8GNpg9BHk
=xor2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
2013/8/2 Steven Chamberlain :
> [Robert - not sure if you saw my last mail, but a new upload of
> freebsd-utils should not be needed now.]
Hi Steven,
Yes, I've seen it. Unfortunately I had already uploaded by then. Sorry :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
2013/7/1 Adam D. Barratt :
> Thanks; please go ahead.
Uploaded. Thank you.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXN
2013/6/29 Adam D. Barratt :
> grub2 (1.99-27.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> Hmmm, this looks to have been based on the wrong version? wheezy has
> 1.99-27+deb7u1 currently.
Yeah, sorry. The wheezy branch in our bazaar repo was tracking the
wrong version.
Here's a fixed diff.
for details.
There's a very simple fix, cherry-picked from upstream.
--
Robert Millan
grub_kfreebsd.diff
Description: Binary data
7u1 is
preferred. Hopefully I can even apply this, if memory serves ;-)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxok
+
+ * Switch to people.debian.org URL for kernel.txz download.
+(Closes: #712816)
+
+ -- Robert Millan Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:56:56 +0200
+
kfreebsd-downloader (9.0-3) unstable; urgency=high
* Split versioned packages to make it possible to install multiple
diff -Nru kfreebsd-downloader-9.0
2012/8/3 Adam D. Barratt :
> Given all of the above, we should consider whether this should wait until
> after the release.
What about #683562? (still not fixed)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
,
see #621890).
An ABI bump was triggered by the second fix.
kfreebsd-9 (9.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /boot symlink kludge. (Closes: #672255)
* fix_VOP_VPTOCNP_bypass_for_nullfs.diff: Fix /proc/self/exe in
nullfs. (Closes: #682291, #681594)
-- Robert Millan Sat, 21 Jul 2012
2012/7/5 Steven Chamberlain :
> I guessed that this (and other low-severity bugs) were flagged like this
> simply because they are usertagged with 'kfreebsd'? In which case that
> may be a bit OTT.
Oh, I see
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
as mandatory for kfreebsd-* to qualify as release
architectures.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofdtx
now.
Does asdfasdf have i386 chroots? If not, is it feasible to add them?
Would then asdfasdf qualify as porter box for kfreebsd-i386?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
2012/5/1 Aurelien Jarno :
>> Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big
>> problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does.
>>
>
> Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix
> that in an uplo
2012/4/22 Robert Millan :
> I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency
> part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new
> packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >=
> 2.13-31.
>
> VERY IMPO
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The hurd-i386 buildd isn't keeping up, so 8.2-11 hurd-i386 builds
haven't been replaced with 8.3-1.
This prevents automated removal of kfreebsd-source-8.2 from unstable,
which I believe is what is currently preventing migration of 8.3-1 to
testing.
--
El 22 d’abril de 2012 17:08, Aurelien Jarno ha escrit:
> I have been mostly away from Debian stuff in the last weeks due to
> moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days
> and schedule an upload for the middle of the week.
Good to hear, thanks.
--
oad right now, please say
it so the package be NMUed.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
setclock.diff
Description: Binary data
l 18 d’abril de 2012 20:45, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> # Bug 654783 cloned as bug 669281
> tag 669281 patch
> retitle 654783 race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7
> testsuite
> severity 654783 wishlist
> reassign 654783 libc0.1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
&
eps migrated last night, with a few
> more migrating this morning. The last package keeping the old libraries in
> testing now is mednafen, which was mising a build; that's now been uploaded
> so hopefully we should be able to get this finished with tonight's britney
> run.
Ve
ek, perhaps it'd make sense to force
migration of those two packages? In both cases the majority of
changes in update have been tested in unstable for more than 10 days
already.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
El 28 de febrer de 2012 22:07, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 11:08 +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
>> #661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
>
> That r
'd suggest to document this in the patch header (maybe this avoids
repeating this discussion FWIW).
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Btw, would a new freebsd-libs upload disrupt anything? A fix for
#661274 is required, although this isn't a transition blocker AFAICT.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
orts contributing patches in this kind of situations
(c.f. k3b).
Anyway, thanks for supplying a fix.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
plied. I've just
> given it back for one last try.
(as said in the other mail a k-k-h update is required)
> fwiw, there's a possibility that vlc might be a blocker, given that the
> new upstream version is FTBFS on multiple architectures (including
> kfreebsd-*).
I
El 25 de febrer de 2012 13:46, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 12:20 +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 660403: cdparanoia: FTFBS on kfreebsd-*
>> -> Unless there's further activity I recommend removing of kfreebsd-*
>> binaries from testing. See
>&
g maintainer.
659659: current version of ifconfig breaks D-I
-> Uploaded fix currently in NEW, expect RSN.
660396: sane-backends: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
-> (kfreebsd-kernel-headers bug) Fixed today in 0.75. BinNMU?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lis
e transition; see #659913.
As explained the culprit is freebsd-buildutils, not freebsd-libs. I
believe freebsd-buildutils 9.0-6 should now build on Linux-based
systems, but I still have no feedback from the buildds. I'd
appreciate if someone can confirm, as I don't have a G
build-dependency (filed as #659622).
colord:
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659624).
libimobiledevice
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659625).
libisoburn:
gratuitous build-dependency (filed as #659621).
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...
Hi Adam,
El 4 de febrer de 2012 19:44, Adam D. Barratt
ha escrit:
> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 19:09 +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> > Should we wait until the current transition is
>> > > over, or upload to
FYI after freebsd-libs 8.3 has migrated to testing, freebsd-libs 9.0
has been uploaded to unstable.
-release: Please can you take appropiate measures to begin the transition?
El 29 de gener de 2012 14:43, Robert Millan ha escrit:
> [ Please CC me, not subscribed! ]
>
> Hi!
>
[ Please CC me, not subscribed! ]
Hi!
We have an incoming soname bump in freebsd-libs (libusb, libusbhid,
libcam and libsbuf). Should we wait until the current transition is
over, or upload to unstable with the new sonames as soon as possible?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2011/12/11 Cyril Brulebois :
> See NBS on http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
>
> If you are in a hurry and can't wait for the semi-automatic decruft
> sessions, file a bug to get them removed.
Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true.
zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of
date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore:
http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfsutils
Will this prevent migration?
--
Robert Milla
2011/12/4 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:13:24 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>> I believe manual removal of kfreebsd-* binaries from testing is needed
>> so that gpe-shield can migrate (if that's not the case then sorry for
>> bothering)
>>
>
I believe manual removal of kfreebsd-* binaries from testing is needed
so that gpe-shield can migrate (if that's not the case then sorry for
bothering)
For details, see http://bugs.debian.org/647655
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
this for kfreebsd-10
(being uploaded as I write).
For kfreebsd-9 maybe it's better to wait a few days since it'll have
to go through NEW soon (upstream 9.0 release).
And for kfreebsd-8 it would interfere with TERM=xterm transition (see
#647672), I'd rather not touch it for now.
-
2011/10/23 Lucas Nussbaum :
>> [kfreebsd] waitpid from threads problem
> > [...]
>> [kfreebsd] thread-related hangs
FYI Petr has been working on a cleaner solution from Glibc side, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/09/msg00072.html
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNS
elease.
However, it's not the cause for this problem (see my other mail). In
fact it's probably harmless, and it's gone with 8.2 anyway. I
wouldn't worry about them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau :
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
>> kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
>> verify earlier than that).
>>
> Wha
on't happen on my arch
(kfreebsd-amd64), as they're i386-specific. I admit I should have
checked both.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
iated, whether from the kfreebsd or d-i side,
> given the increasingly short period of time we have remaining until the
> point release is scheduled.
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
verif
ext
> dinstall.
I notice they've been installed. Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caofd
've uploaded a BinNMU for both packages.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXPW77aouTqOvyC=vpfjhhvmvpg53+eg0npoioy6t4-...@mail.gmail.com
n your
reply, now I assume it does.
> Might it not make more
> sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4?
Sure, we can get back to this later.
Thanks
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt :
>> > Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze
>> > point release closes over this weekend.
>>
>> Uploaded.
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
