On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:12:07PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For powerpc, I
- follow debian-powerpc
- investigate and assist with powerpc-specific issues
builds when needed
- run powerpc hardware used for the above
- am willing to investigate and fix toolchain and arch-specific
bugs
I am not primarily a porter; I just deal with powerpc porting issues on
occasion when requested e.g. bootstrapping things etc.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 13:37 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
What's the plan for getting this fixed in sid? The change looks okay
(although -3.3+ would
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 21:33 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
+sysvinit (2.88dsf-41+wheezy1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ [ Roger Leigh ]
+ * Correct the Breaks on bootchart to ensure that all broken
+versions
/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+sysvinit (2.88dsf-41+wheezy1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ [ Roger Leigh ]
+ * Correct the Breaks on bootchart to ensure that all broken
+versions are removed on upgrade (Closes: #694252). Break
+bootchart 0.10~svn407-4 to ensure that 0.10~svn407
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:27:23PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:31:08PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 17:56, schrieb Roger Leigh:
The transitional package does need a version higher than the initscripts
Breaks: sysklogd ( 1.5-6.2)
so a 1.5-7 would
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:37:14AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Roger Leigh]
sysklogd is dead upstream and unmaintained in Debian for over 2½
years.
It has been practically abandoned for a lot longer than that. The lack
of maintenance of sysklogd is part of the reason rsyslog
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:31:08PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 17:56, schrieb Roger Leigh:
The transitional package does need a version higher than the initscripts
Breaks: sysklogd ( 1.5-6.2)
so a 1.5-7 would be OK. This could be done as a separate sysklogd
package
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:26:30PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:50:51AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Roger Leigh wrote:
Alexander, is this approach OK with you? If you're happy with
what this is doing, can this go into wheezy?
its basically
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:50:51AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Roger Leigh wrote:
Alexander, is this approach OK with you? If you're happy with
what this is doing, can this go into wheezy?
its basically your feature, so if you think its working - I am happy
if the file-rc maintainers could take the time to make
sure if this is working properly; I'll be happy to make any changes
to the sysv-rc maintainer scripts if required to assist in this.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh
, can this go into wheezy?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
diff -urN file
in place ahead of time. And you should
have also done some testing to avoid breaking so many people's
computers; this is just not acceptable.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org
. There are lots of people who can't boot
their computers thanks to this recklessness.
Please, revert it today.
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:41:05PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 03/06/2013 09:51 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
3) fsck.btrfs does not support the standard fsck options
easy fixable, but hasn't much to do with the current remaining problem
in sid.
Yes, it does.
no, it does not.
even
severity 701936 critical
thanks
This is a critical bug. Please do not lower the severity again.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:51:21PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:17:44PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
(Using the new bug number)
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:14:59PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:32
-01-24 21:33:09.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,50 @@
+sysvinit (2.88dsf-38) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Roger Leigh ]:
+ * If pidof fails in the sysvinit postinst or initscripts, default
+to PID 1 (for /sbin/init) (Closes: #663009).
+ * Make fstab globbing in initscripts completely robust
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:42:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: block -1 by 686387
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 22:03 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package sysvinit
Bugs closed:
#694961: Don't break boot with older upstart versions
For reference, this means
(Using the new bug number)
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:14:59PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:32:19PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package sysvinit
The attached debdiff includes a correction to the init script
failure to restart init on upgrade; the fix in this unblock
request does not solve all failure cases; an additional
upload will be required.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
diff -Nru sysvinit-2.88dsf/debian/changelog sysvinit-2.88dsf
the user/installer
chooses, then is modifying a conffile acceptable in this case; other
tools do this on the user's behalf.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd
when
shutting down
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:23:10AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package schroot
I
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:25:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
On 12/05/2012 03:11 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
But don't worry - it's just a minor change and at least fixes the issue
for the protocol. ;-) So others won't
not match the behaviour
on the buildds, so while it will fix things for local builds, it won't
work on the buildds until the patch is committed into git and merged
onto the buildd branch and then deployed.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package insserv
Closes #693371. This corrects the dependencies for the $local_fs
runlevel, which prevents /run being cleaned out of order, causing
the udev state to be
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:48:43AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 15.11.2012 23:32, Roger Leigh wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sysvinit
The attached debdiff includes
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:11:13AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 16.11.2012 01:48, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 15.11.2012 23:32, Roger Leigh wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package schroot
I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package schroot
I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some
documentation for wheezy upgrade issues, plus some fixes for
serious
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package schroot
I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some
documentation for wheezy upgrade issues, plus some fixes for
serious and important bugs in wheezy:
I had to make an additional 3 line
.
-- Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:30:38 +0100
debdiff attached. Note that because two of the bugfixes required
some refactoring, the patch is large due to changing some method
signatures and moving code around; I also updated the testsuite and
the po translations, which are the bulk
the security
team, who said it wasn't severe enough for a security update, but
would probably be OK for a point release.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:25:19AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sysvinit
sysvinit in unstable fixes a large number of bugs:
55707 232569 353229 385172 386368
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:25:19AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Please unblock package sysvinit
sysvinit in unstable does contain two bugs marked RC:
#679409: This only appears to affect upstart; it's not yet clear
what the root cause of this is, or if it's actually a
bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sysvinit
sysvinit in unstable fixes a large number of bugs:
55707 232569 353229 385172 386368 403863 437176 438895 518249
539261 540448 543793 545401 545438 550425
issue (I'll have
to double-check the bug #) which needs checking and fixing as
well.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:40:34AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
Please could you unblock schroot? It contains the following
changes:
- PAM pam_env is used to set up additional environment from
/etc/security/pam_env.conf and /etc/default/locale.
This single change was reverted
/bin/X11 and /usr/games have been removed from the
default PATH.
-- Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:10:24 +0100
schroot (1.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream stable release.
* schroot:
- Remove invalid and obsolete symlinks which were being created
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:43:08PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:21:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
gutenprint 5.2.8
This is a point release with a large number of new printer
models being supported. It was released 2 days ago, but we've
been waiting
+1, as
well as for properly supporting dependency-based boot in wheezy.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:40:50AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I'd like the following to be permitted to be uploaded for wheezy:
schroot 1.6.0
This is just 1.5.4 in unstable with translation updates and
a few minor bugfixes. This is the stable release intended for
the wheezy
safely or sensibly handle.
Doesn't the Ubuntu updater tool do something like this already when
it does a full upgrade between releases?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org
unlikely I'll have time until then to start work on it.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3
and be happy to undertake specific
porting and debugging as and when required.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A
to be blocking libpam-mount, but it's claiming
libhx27 is out of date (but it's no longer present, replaced by
libhx28).
Not sure if this needs any manual untangling or not--just to let
you know that it's blocking things.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:47:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 13:29:42 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:20:34PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
libpam-mount depends on Linux-only libraries (libpam-mount), and
additionally dropped support for BSD
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
available at http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/schroot-squeeze/
Is this fixed in unstable already
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
available at http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/schroot-squeeze/
Is this fixed in unstable already
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:25:27PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 01:35:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
available at http://www.codelibre.net
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:43:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable,
and the same bug is also
to upload a fixed version of the schroot package
to stable-proposed-updated containing just this one line fix?
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable,
and the same bug is also present in unstable. I filed this as
#626503. The patch is a one-liner to fix a regression in the
dchroot.conf conffile loading
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:09:10PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I was informed today that dchroot-dsa was non-functional in stable,
and the same bug is also present in unstable. I filed this as
#626503. The patch is a one
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:01:53AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net (10/01/2011):
Thanks, I have released, tested, built and uploaded.
#609619
This has been fixed and now autobuilds OK on kfreebsd-*. Please
could you unblock 1.4.19-1 which contains just
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:44:10AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Roger Leigh a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:14:47PM -0500, David Holland wrote:
Can this please get done (adding a C.UTF-8 locale)? It is absolutely
required for writing shell scripts that handle UTF-8 data, if you want
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:36:12PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:39 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:38:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
We also update
the 50chrootname setup script
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:38:09PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 15:06 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Sorry to trouble you again, but I found soon after this release
#609108 which was breaking schroot on all kfreebsd platforms.
This is actually due to the statfs structure
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522776#342
This will only be done with the approval of the release team, who
I've copied in.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:14:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 15:38 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:44:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As discussed on IRC, it's a shame that this resulted in a new
translatable (and currently untranslated
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:26:18PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:06:35 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Is this OK to upload and be allowed into testing?
At least not until the previous version goes in (I didn't look at the
proposed changes).
Of course. I won't
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've cherry-picked all of the required changes and put them here for
your approval (diff also attached against debian/sbuild-0.60.0-2):
http://git.debian.org/?p
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:42:23AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:10:23PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
sbuild in squeeze has been neglected for some time, and it contains
quite a large number of bugs and deficiencies. This was mainly due
to the fact that I
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:42:23AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
I've cherry-picked all of the required changes and put them here for
your approval (diff also attached against debian/sbuild-0.60.0-2):
http://git.debian.org/?p=buildd
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:44:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:31 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've made a new upload of schroot to unstable which fixes a few
security- and upgrade-related bugs. The bulk of the changes are
documentation (manual pages, release notes
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:44:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:31 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've made a new upload of schroot to unstable which fixes a few
security- and upgrade-related bugs. The bulk of the changes are
documentation (manual pages, release notes
reduction in overhead on busy systems (Closes: #606162). Thanks
to Anders Kaseorg for this patch.
-- Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:29:25 +
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:10:23PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'm afraid this isn't just minimal bugfixing, it's basically three new
upstream releases worth of changes. But, I think it's important to
have in squeeze for these key
will block until the operation is completed.
-- Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org Sun, 07 Nov 2010 22:33:15 +
sbuild (0.60.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New release.
* sbuild:
- Dependency resolving:
. The aptitude build dependency resolver now sets
Aptitude::CmdLine::Ignore
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:19:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 17:00 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I have updated schroot to fix the RC bug #597368. This broke buildds
using plain type chroots which aren't really session capable. This
is fixed by creating proxy
://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot-1.4.13/schroot_1.4.13-1.dsc
as are amd64 binaries
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/schroot-1.4.13/schroot_1.4.13-1_amd64.changes
Is this OK to upload and go into squeeze?
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:55:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
#595647 is the only outstanding issue (and it's not a regression,
just behaviour not matching documentation), and is just a two-liner
to fix.
I uploaded 1.4.12-1
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:46:52PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:07:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:33:10PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
#595647 is the only outstanding issue (and it's not a regression,
just behaviour not matching documentation), and is just a two-liner
to fix.
I uploaded 1.4.12-1 to fix this issue and also #594720. I've also
put the following
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:03:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:34:10PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Please could you unblock gutenprint 5.2.6-1?
245 files
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:33:10PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hi Roger,
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Please could you unblock schroot 1.4.10-2?
127 files changed, 6132 insertions(+), 6896 deletions(-)
*cough* This is a bit much and far away from properly
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:34:10PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Please could you unblock gutenprint 5.2.6-1?
245 files changed, 114059 insertions(+), 82843 deletions(-)
Why?
It's a new upstream release which adds new support for
5
it.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the consensus is once agreed upon in my
postgresql-debversion package. I can also put in conditionals
to make it build with older versions again, but I'd like a
pointer to an example to see what's needed to conditionally
build 8.4.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:18:35PM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
to make it build with older versions again, but I'd like a
pointer to an example to see what's needed to conditionally
build 8.4.
That depends a lot on what features of 8.4 you're
data. Is the lack
of automation here the problem?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your
) incompatible
change to my configure script to make my stuff build again :(
And it also means code can't build with any version prior to 1.59 once
you update your configure code.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:59:35AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Roger Leigh (rle...@codelibre.net) [090830 11:09]:
Is this change intentional, or just a bug in the 1.39 packaging?
Does this retain or break
to have one in the dependency. If you need a versioned
depdendency, you need to depend upon a real package, or set of
alternative packages perhaps with each having a version requirement.
Does apt even support this?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
. We've
certainly seen stuff like that in the past, though I thought we handled
provides a bit better now.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key
here
that's different between the unstable and experimental sbuilds?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848
is being
created it looks like we are still looking for a solution.
It would be great if we can have a general method for specifying
distribution-wide virtual package defaults, of which
mail-transport-agent-default is just one.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:07:34PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
[moving debian-rele...@l.d.o to Bcc, continuing discussion in bug log]
...
I
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 02:50:47PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:18:55AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Could I have the go-ahead to upload schroot_1.2.2-0+lenny1 to
stable-proposed-updates please?
Go ahead.
Thanks. The final package is at
http://www.codelibre.net
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Following finding the cause of this failure, I'd like to propose
the following patch (attached) to correct it. This is also in
git; the last five commits
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:52:47AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Following finding the cause of this failure, I'd like to propose
the following patch (attached
locking bug in libstdc++). The tested
patch is attached to the bug report, and has also been uploaded to
unstable.
Could I have the go-ahead to upload schroot_1.2.2-0+lenny1 to
stable-proposed-updates please?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http
as well.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index c8a0cc4
the library link names).
So it's been pretty easy to port to the new version, and if 1.38 is
similar to 1.37, it will be as simple as just updating the
Build-Deps.
BTW, thanks for all your work on Boost Steve, it's much appreciated!
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please could you unblock sbuild 0.57.5-1?
I have since uploaded 0.57.6-1 to unstable. Compared with 0.57.5,
this is just two hunks (excluding changelog and version bump). I
would really like to get this into Lenny.
diff --git a/lib/Sbuild/Build.pm b/lib
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:02:38AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please could you unblock sbuild 0.57.5-1?
45 files changed, 1143 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)
You are kidding, right?
No. This is a point release, which missed the freeze
://git.debian.org/?p=buildd-tools/sbuild.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sbuild-lenny
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
