Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Can someone please schedule them? > > Any news? Apparently not... It would be very nice if the binNMUs could be scheduled soon since all the packages depending (directly or indirectly) on ocaml are

Re: Bug#439272: sysprof: package not usable

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/10/2007): >> This bug [#439272] is marked "grave" and is not usable because of the >> missing library file. > >> Any fixes ? > > I'm suggesting a binNMU, since a rebuild looks like sufficient to update > the dependencies (in

[Fwd: Getting Polipo 0.9.12 into Debian Etch?]

Hi debian-releasse, Could you please allow polipo 0.9.12-1 (that I've just uploaded) into etch? Apparently, upstream would really like to see it into etch and it only fixes important bugs (see the mail below). Thanks! Cheers, Samuel. Original Message Subject: Getting Polipo 0

Please allow penggy 0.2.1-14

Hi, Could you please allow penggy 0.2.1-14 into testing? The only changes are the addition of a debconf translation and a bump of standards version. Thanks! Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please allow mldonkey t-p-u

Hi, Could you please allow the t-p-u of mldonkey (2.8.1-2etch1)? It only fixes an important bug which lead to uploading twice the data to eMule servers, see bug #406247. Upstream and I have successfully tested that the patched package behaves correctly. Thanks! Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing

Hi, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Could you please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing? Currently testing has > 0.2.2-1 and the only difference between them is a patch that corrects > the url where to download new levels for the game (upstream has moved > his website). The xmoto package has be

Please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing

Hi, Could you please allow xmoto 0.2.2-2 in testing? Currently testing has 0.2.2-1 and the only difference between them is a patch that corrects the url where to download new levels for the game (upstream has moved his website). Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: [Fwd: [Caml-list] 3.09.3 release candidate 1]

Hi debian-release, It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon. Cheers, Samuel. Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: >> Get prepared for a new full rebuild! > > Can you post this to debian-release, i am banned from i

Re: Starting a transition to ocaml 3.09.2

Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: A new version of ocaml (3.09.2) is available. Since the caml libraries are binary

Starting a transition to ocaml 3.09.2

Hi, A new version of ocaml (3.09.2) is available. Since the caml libraries are binary-incompatible between releases, this means that we have to rebuild all the caml libraries before caml can hit testing. Do you see any problem if we start a transition to ocaml 3.09.2? Cheers, Samuel. -- To UN

Re: GKrellM bugs #309089, #310471

Hi, Philipp Hartmann wrote: The recent NMU of Samuel (see #309089) to link GKrellM against GNUTLS introduced a bug (#310471), for which I already filed a patch. Since the GKrellM package version 2.2.5-1.2 is now hinted into Sarge, I would like to know how this should be handled. The crashes wi

Re: please accept NMU of gkrellm

Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 05:09:58PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible) openssl. I've been able to get my mail count (it

please accept NMU of gkrellm

Hi, I've just made an NMU for gkrellm to close the RC-bug #309089. I've only added a patch to make gkrellm use gnutls instead of (GPL-incompatible) openssl. I've been able to get my mail count (it's the only use of ssl in gkrellm) over imaps and some people told me that they have been able to

Please accept linphone into sarge (was: libosip2 and libosip2-3)

Hi, Could linphone be accepted into sarge? Steve Langasek wrote: Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (provisionally) approving both to g

please don't ship coq-doc with sarge

Hi, The coq documentation (in package coq-doc) shouldn't be shipped with sarge. It is currently not free, see #294865, and I have very little hope that this issue will be solved before sarge's release. Regards, Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Please accept ocamldsort 0.14.3-1.1

Hi, The NMU 0.14.3-1.1 of ocamldsort fixes the RC bug #307708: the build dependency on ocaml-nox just needed to be updated according to the new version of ocaml. Thanks for your work. Regards, Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E