Re: Request for a freeze exception for xfce4-mpc-plugin 0.3.3-2

2009-01-04 Thread Simon Huggins
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:01:37PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 03:48:49PM +0000, Simon Huggins wrote: > > I've been trying to get time to upload this fix lately. There are quite > > a few potential buffer overflows in the 0.3.3-1 code one of which h

Request for a freeze exception for xfce4-mpc-plugin 0.3.3-2

2009-01-03 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi, I've been trying to get time to upload this fix lately. There are quite a few potential buffer overflows in the 0.3.3-1 code one of which hit a user as per bug #498770. The changelog is just: * Patch for buffer overflow in numerous places and also replace snprintf(foo, "%s...", foo, ..

Re: "new bugs" already fixed

2008-05-09 Thread Simon Huggins
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:33:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080509 12:20]: > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:39:28AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:37:51AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > On F

Re: "new bugs" already fixed

2008-05-09 Thread Simon Huggins
unstable (0.0.10-7). > Ah, right. Sorry for the false alarm, then! It does say "introduces new bugs" (twice) and "has new bugs". These aren't true; the bugs are only in the out of date package. Perhaps the output can be fixed? -- Simon Huggins \ "The claw is ou

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] xfce4 stable update for CVE-2007-6351

2008-01-29 Thread Simon Huggins
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:58:08AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were > published for xfce4 some time ago. for xfce4? These concern libexif. Did you paste the wrong CVEs? > CVE-2007-6351[0]: > | libexif 0.6.16 and earlier allows context-de

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] xfce4 stable update for CVE-2007-6351

2008-01-29 Thread Simon Huggins
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:05:50AM +, Simon Huggins wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:58:08AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were > > published for xfce4 some time ago. > for xfce4? These concern libexif. Did yo

Bump xfwm4 in testing given new GTK there

2007-11-03 Thread Simon Huggins
Ah, I was about to send a message describing how having gtk 2.12 and xfwm4 < 4.4.1-3 in testing is bad but then HE said: 10:53 huggie: It just needs a requeue, it was tried on September 21., but the build failed due to uninstallable build-deps http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

2007-05-20 Thread Simon Huggins
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 09:48:22PM +, Martin Zobel-Helas - automated mail wrote: > muttstable1.5.13-1.1 alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips > mipsel powerpc s390 sparc source > muttupdates 1.5.13-1.1etch1 alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel > powerpc s390 spar

orage: stable update needed perhaps?

2007-04-28 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi, There is a memory leak in orage which is a calendaring app for Xfce. It was fixed in October by upstream so unstable's version is unaffected but sadly etch is affected. It leaks memory every second and a user found this and reported it. It's not a huge amount but obviously if you leave your

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-18 Thread Simon Huggins
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:11:29AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 10:40:34AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > > Also, padding is extremely frustrating. The 4 month wait from December > > to April effectively froze uploads from October/November[0] until April &

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the lenny cycle

2007-04-13 Thread Simon Huggins
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:14:33PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > The release team is currently working on a schedule for the lenny > release cycle. For that, we want to gather some data from the bigger > software packaging teams in Debian first. > Our current, very rough plans would mean

Re: xfce4-diskperf-plugin does not work on Debian Etch

2007-03-29 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi ar, This isn't really relevant for -release. You should drop the CC there if you reply. pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org is a better address. On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:24:00PM +0100, ar wrote: > xfce4-diskperf-plugin 2.0-2 is already included in that installation. > I have two SATA dr

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Holding off xfce4 uploads until current packages migrate to testing

2006-08-12 Thread Simon Huggins
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 11:51:08AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:56:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I'm tracking it here: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/~adeodato/migration/libxfce4util.html > > If you don't mind, I'd like to

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Holding off xfce4 uploads until current packages migrate to testing

2006-08-06 Thread Simon Huggins
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:56:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > I'm tracking it here: > http://ftp-master.debian.org/~adeodato/migration/libxfce4util.html > If you don't mind, I'd like to ask you to hold off if possible any > uploads any of the packages in the linked page until they have made >

3 removals for xfce

2006-06-03 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi, I asked on IRC but noone seemed to respond so I'm asking again here. Could someone please remove: xfce4-notes-plugin #370111 xfce4-datetime-plugin #370113 xfce4-cpufreq-plugin #370114 from etch? Basically we've updated to a new shiny release of xfce4 and these plugins

Re: Why discover1-data is so old in Debian Sarge, while in unstable is up to date ?

2005-06-05 Thread Simon Huggins
'ello Petter On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Joerg Jaspert] > > Sarge is closed, so you are out of luck. > Actually, the users with that hardware is out of luck. I'm happy, as > I got hardware already handled by discover1-data in sarge. > Oh, well. To bad

Re: Release update: GNOME 2.8, yes; freeze date waiting for infrastructure

2004-11-30 Thread Simon Huggins
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:21:25PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > Getting testing-security up and running is blocking on a couple of > changes to the archive configuration. Security uploads are first > uploaded to their own archive while the security announcement is in > preparation, and later (via

Re: Removal-from-testing proposals, current version

2004-03-04 Thread Simon Huggins
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:18:53AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > remove xfdeskmenu4/4.0.0+cvs.20021222-2 > #229943, plus, without xfce in sarge, what's the point? This is supposed to be replaced by xfdesktop4 as its description explains. I've filed against ftp.debian.org for its removal, cc'