.
We are still discussing the move of contrib to debian-ports. It requires
mini-dak improvements I believe.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
one probably belongs in testing anyway as they are
m68k-specific. I believe all the other m68k-specific packages have
already been punted.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=maximaarch=m68kver=5.13.0-3.1stamp=1205105278file=logas=raw
On it.
m68k buildd issues should probably go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
best results. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on that and also on kullervo.
At least that explains why I couldn't get to crest the other day. :)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
need to do to get back in and release with lenny?
requalify
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
It appears
m68k/mac. (This is due to an actual user request.)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
haven't been working.
Dude, either help or go away.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to maintain unstable/testing as the distribution on my buildd's.
(d) try to release with etch+1, possibly with coldfire support
ack
The m68k certification pages on the wiki suggest it might be good to
have acks/naks from:
1. Wouter Verhelst
2. Stephen R Marenka
:)
3
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:02:07AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:12:13AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I think we do need to have a discussion about ports that don't build the
full archive, but otherwise can make a stable release and get security
support
updates from the regular source updates available on
s.d.o on your own.
Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and mail servers, and irc clients. Anything less will make it hard to
support the port and two years to another release is a long time.
Okay, that's more than I intended to write.
Peace,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:43:54AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not saying quantity isn't a problem or that politics isn't annoying,
but the m68k port's biggest problem since gcc-4.0 rolled out has been
the toolchain.
I don't
didn't accidentally delay
the release or something.
In any case, the m68k dailies have already moved to 2.6. We've dropped
the subarchs that don't work with 2.6 yet.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
- m68k kernel udebs were originally built incorrectly; I understood this
has been corrected but new udebs are not yet available in gluck:~dannf
Should still be at gluck:~smarenka/m68k-lkdi-take2
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's
with the package.
Periodically, we do rebuild old failed to see if they work with the new
environment.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
happens that I just worked through this on m68k. I rebuilt
ftgl-dev then rebuilt gnubg against that and it built fine.
It looks to me like a binNMU of ftgl-dev on m68k and hppa followed by
a requeue of gnubg should do the trick.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing
I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to
its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks
like a binNMU of fluidsynth should fix this? Is that correct?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:11:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:34:59AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to
its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks
like a binNMU
the m68k-build folks cover a pretty wide
range of time zones. :-)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it is added to the archive, and the next day it hits the
mirror, and the next day the next build in the sequence can start.
We've been able to build out of incoming for quite some time, so once
a package is accepted, we can use it.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing
manual builds on crest? Or is the bug known to not
be fixed at all?
I've queued them up and I'll close the bugs as they get built or not as
appropriate.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
by the
buildd admin?
The security team signs the logs directly and returns them back to the
buildd, which uploads them.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m68k/atari
machines not previously supported and fixes problems loading the
ramdisk to TT/FastRAM.
I'm the co-maintainer of the package.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on q650 took 70 hours. apache2 also
was taken by a4000t and not logged. Might be some lag there, maybe the box
went down.
Adam said he'd taken it to lock it. He thought mrvn was building it and
wouter was handling uploads.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL
27 matches
Mail list logo
