Re: keeping old library versions in testing

Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > we discussed in Vancouver to keep the old library versions around in > testing as long as anything depends on it, and still allow the new > version in. Today, I had a bit time to fiddle around with britney. What > I actually tested was: > foo | 1 | u

Re: Removing mozilla from sid/etch?

Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hej, > The recently released mozilla 1.7.13 is supposed to be the last > release of the mozilla suite. > > http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/04/12/sunset-announcement-for-fxtb-10x-and-mozilla-suite-17x/ > | These releases will include the final set of off

easy hint

easy snmpkit/0.9-11.1 libprinterconf/0.5-8 #burgerspace is a binNMU easy gengameng/4.1-7 burgerspace/1.6.1-2 #monopd is a binNMU easy libcapsinetwork/0.3.0-2 libmath++/0.0.4-3 monopd/0.9.3-1 #rapple is a binNMU easy rapple/1.0-1 tidy/20051018-1 easy vdr/1.3.37-1 vdr-plugin-weather/0.2.1e-20 vdr

Re: Licence issue with sarg

Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:15:20AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: Hi all, I need help solving a licence issue with sarg. Tonight I found that sarg upstream sources contain a font file that may not be free (Verdana.TTF). I've contacted upstream a few minutes ago. In the

Re: Release Notes - non-us being phased out - please comment

Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:18:36PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Prompted by Jeroen van Wolffelaar I propose to include the following text in the Release Notes to make users aware that non-us is being phased out. *non-us being phased out* For the sarge release most crypt

Re: Please hint aptitude into testing

Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:41:17PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: aptitude 0.2.15.9-2 is now old enough to go into testing. This version fixes a bunch of translation bugs and adds conditionally-compiled support for the security features of apt 0.6 (this support isn't compile

Re: Spamassassin 3.0 not in testing

MrVanes wrote: Hi, I've been watching the spamassassin package page (http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/spamassassin.html) for a while now, hoping for spamassassin 3.0 to enter testing but it's being held (for 23 days) by some 'aba'. SA has no dependancies (as far as I can see) that need to be ful