Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

/4/10, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Tuco wrote: >> I think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very >> usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage area thanks to ZFS >> (for example http://www.ypass.net/solaris/zfsbackup/). > > Yeah,

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

I intend to deploy Debian GNU/kFreeBSD as a backup / NAS server. I think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage area thanks to ZFS (for example http://www.ypass.net/solaris/zfsbackup/). I also think it can be a good firewall with

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

On 8/4/10, Petr Salinger wrote: > * openjdk on both kfreebsd-i386/kfreebsd-amd64 >man-power is missing, we use gcj similarly as hppa I'm working on openjdk. But progress is slow because it takes a lot of time to build after each fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists