On 09/12/2013 07:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 16:52:54 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> But anyway the big thing that still needs to happen AFAICS is
>> fixing the ucto dependency of frog. This can either be fixed by
>> reuploading ucto similar t
irtually non-existant.
>
> - imageshack-uploader 2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-5.1 patch is available for
> libav9, but FTBFS
> for weird qmake reasons. Popcon is marginal.
Removal hints added.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
have that migrated to testing, before really taking
it over AFAICS.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/522ea74f.8010...@debian.org
al popcon.
As avbin is in the deferred queue fixing its RC bugs, it can stay for now.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/522ad380.3060...@debian.org
On 09/06/2013 04:03 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> The binNMUs for performous failed on ia64, mips(el) and s390(x) due to
> #721577. Could they be given back please? On mips(el) boost 1.54.0-3 is
> not yet installed, so a dep-wait is needed there.
given back and dep-wait set.
Ch
t; Can you trigger a binNMU?
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 17:47:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>
>>> kid3 also builds successfully. Could binNMUs for it be scheduled too?
>>>
>> Both scheduled.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Could you also schedule
On 09/07/2013 01:04 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> I've just uploaded telepathy-logger 0.8.0-2 in unstable.
>
> Could you please start the binNMU for the level 1 (empathy, gnome-shell
> and telepathy-logger-qt).
They have been scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--
To U
. Please ping this bug when xbae is built everywhere
>> and the binNMUs have to be scheduled.
>
> xbae is now built and installed on all architectures.
binNMUs are scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Hi Jay
Your plan looks good except that I think it would be better to have
libtiff5-dev provide libtiff-dev and not introduce a proper libtiff-dev.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
o happen AFAICS is
fixing the ucto dependency of frog. This can either be fixed by
reuploading ucto similar to the others or changing frog's build dependency.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
e successfully rebuild vxl against current sid/libav9. Can you schedule
> a binNMU for vxl 1.17.0-5 ?
The failed binNMUs given back.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On 08/29/2013 11:52 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> Could you also please rebuild the following package that are currently
> in experimental:
Done.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 08/27/2013 05:26 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Alle martedì 27 agosto 2013, Luk Claes ha scritto:
>>> With the hints Luk added this morning basically almost everything
>>> migrated, except some sources split of kdemultimedia: libkcddb and
>>> kio-audiocd; kdemult
On 08/26/2013 10:14 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Alle domenica 25 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
>> On 2013-08-25 15:03, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> On 08/25/2013 02:25 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>>> So, given that things are getting stuck because of us, I'
Hi
Please start the transition and let this bug know when you uploaded to
unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/521
; nothing.
>
> So, given that things are getting stuck because of us, I'm getting
> prodded in different channels, different new transitions are coming up,
> and I don't have time/experience to debug the aforementioned issues, I
> (reluctantly, from my
'
Set a dep-wait on the new cernlib instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5218e833.2060...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2013 03:03 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Luk Claes (11/05/2013):
>> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
>> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu
>
> Hi,
>
>> Please accept the upd
regression (not using default domain).
Thanks already!
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130511125434.9899.52157.report...@station.luk.local
On 07/28/2012 02:57 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 14:42:46 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> On 07/28/2012 02:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> The changes in -2 are out of scope for the freeze IMO.
>>
>> Can you be more specific please?
>>
full
>> satisfaction.
>>
> The changes in -2 are out of scope for the freeze IMO.
Can you be more specific please?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5013de46.7040...@debian.org
On 07/15/2012 04:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Luk,
Hi KiBi
> I would be very pleased if you could communicate a little about your
> unblocks. Particularly, tasksel is a /slightly/ delicate package as
> we're trying to get d-i beta 1 out. Unblocking it without talking to
with acpi-support and other power managers
interfering with
> each other and I don't want to see those come up again. So please unblock.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hi
Ok, so that's basically changing build dependencies and a few minor
fixes which I got confirmed got thorough testing, so unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
On 07/07/2012 10:43 PM, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Sorry, I didn't notice that the scim package has been built
On 07/05/2012 10:06 PM, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> Please unblock scim-chewing 0.3.4-2 which has fixed a FTBFS problem
> #676009 without other changes.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
ther or did you
stop at that sentence?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe4dcea.3040...@debian.org
in?
Unless I misread it's exactly *not* what is being encouraged?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe4addd.9000...@debian.org
to do that would be a first step that makes much more
sense than having it automated at this stage IMHO.
> Doesn't the Ubuntu updater tool do something like this already when
> it does a full upgrade between releases?
There were quite some bugs with that tool AFAIR. Does it also cover
t
> The fix looked good, thanks.
>
> Could someone please trigger a giveback of ruby-cairo with this fixed
> gem2deb?
ruby-cairo and gdal given back.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
nd developers and will give them false hope or possibly
distract them of what matters for the upcoming release. I would rather
recommend adding hurd to testing right after the release.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc3e76f.4060...@debian.org
On 05/19/2012 05:00 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
>> I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway
Hi
As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy,
I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway.
Cheers
Luk
On 05/19/2012 10:28 AM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May
binary for
> powerpc». http://bugs.debian.org/662594
> """
Which does not follow the prescribed syntax mentioned in the wiki page
above ...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f55066e.4010...@debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Hi
Version 0.8.7b-2.1+lenny4 interface statistics does not work anymore after the
previous security fix. Below oneliner fixes this.
Cheers
Luk
diff -u cacti-0.8.7b/debian/changelog cacti
On 01/12/2012 10:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 653757 + squeeze confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 19:10 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> This version fixes a security issue which the Security Team evaluated
>> as not warranting a DSA. Attached the diff of the pr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
This version fixes a security issue which the Security Team evaluated as not
warranting a DSA. Attached the diff of the proposed upload.
Cheers
Luk
diff -Nru nfs-utils-1.2.2/debian
On 12/14/2011 08:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 23:54 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> The security team asked us to consider an upload to pu fixing 2 low
>> severity security issues (which don't warrant a DSA).
> [...]
>> +cifs-utils (2:4.5-2+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
The security team asked us to consider an upload to pu fixing 2 low severity
security issues (which don't warrant a DSA).
Attached a debdiff of the proposed upload.
Cheers
Luk
diff
thout running the autotools?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ec6dade.60...@debian.org
x27;t be removed, please help fixing it!!!
Progress can be seen on the transition tracker page [1]. Currently it
looks worse than the above as some builds (mainly powerpc) are not
uploaded yet.
Cheers
Luk
[1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.14.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
uires a versioned build-dependency, then both packages could
> just have been uploaded at the same time. Even if we accepted them both
> from p-u-NEW together, the buildds would have put nfs-common in to the
> "build-deps uninstallable" state until the necessary version of krb
3 point release.
Upstream did some changes related to this which should fix it in
unstable for the squeeze -> 2.6.35 kernel range. Kernels afterwards
should not have the problem.
It would be good if someone could confirm that it is really fixed in
unstable now.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 09/22/2011 07:55 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 642390 + squeeze confirmed
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 07:37 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Ok if I upload an updated ipmitool with the following patch?
>>
>> diff -u ipmitool-1.8.11/debian/patches/series ipmi
printf("Disabled");
+ else
+ printf("No Reading");
+
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 08/02/2011 10:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch
>> where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats?
>
> Maybe they try to tackle the "
ave a lower priority than
important.
> I would appreciate knowing how the release team expects this to work? I
> asked
> about this on Niels Thykier suggested I write an email instead.
Above I've given my understanding of how it should work. It would be
good if someone could confirm o
;t have to "handle" it at
> all.
Why could wb not handle the case where one tries to binNMU on one arch
where it should be done on all archs without changing binNMU formats?
Or am I missing something?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
nges are not
> going to happen at once but in a progressive process and at the end
> this is going to make the installer release process easier to
> understand and handle.
Right, lets go for it!
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
itrd and puts this
> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package.
>
> Comments, welcome :-)
Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of
binary (or udeb) packages.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
le is that a release is supported up to the next release + 1 year
unless the release after the next one comes earlier. So for Lenny that
would mean until release date of Squeeze + 1 year (February 6th 2012)
unless Wheezy would be released earlier. Obviously Wheezy won't be
released before, s
AFAICT. I also don't buy that
a Conflicts relationship should be special instead of a plain one like now.
I won't stop anyone from experimenting with a SAT based solution, though
from a release point of view, I think it would be better to start using
britney2 and kill its bugs (which unfor
ave
> to change the binary package names.
Ok, looks fine. Go ahead with the upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4deb33ec.2020...@debian.org
On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Luk,
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> This is still abo
hould not be documented
> in the bts.
There currently are mails to inform people of upcoming point releases
and mails to announce point releases when everything is available on the
mirror network. What is it that you are still missing and what exactly
can be done to get that fixed?
Cheers
oaded to unstable? So both the build and
usage can be tested before random packages start to use it.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9b4dc0.7070...@debian.org
also e-mail us to propose a
new goal, including
> a description of the goal and an indication of how progress on the
issues may be tracked
> (e.g. a pointer to a set of appropriate user-tagged bugs).
# bootperformance
Advocate: Petter Reinholdsen and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: ht
on't be pushed through -updates, no? Normal updates are included into
> stable through point releases.
AFAICT -updates should be used when changes should be pushed to users
right now aka even before a point release.
So all in -updates would be included in the point release together with
other
On 11/24/2010 04:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please unblock and age following packages:
>
> user-setup
> hw-detect
> os-prober
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
to
> be true).
AFAIK only when something is undistributable will it be removed from
archive.debian.org
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce1512a.3070...@debian.org
erformance?
Definitely not! ia32-libs should die after squeeze. multiarch is taking
long, very long indeed. Though most of it's progress was made during the
squeeze cycle, the main missing bit to really start using multiarch is
dpkg AFAICS. I still think it's very unfortunate that d
On 10/28/2010 06:14 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 28.10.2010 08:08, schrieb Luk Claes:
>>>
>>> Please notify me, if I could go ahead with my upload for Squeeze.
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Please upload. Frankly I'm quite shocked by the general quality of
|8
> 14 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 246 deletions(-)
>
> Please notify me, if I could go ahead with my upload for Squeeze.
> Thanks.
Please upload. Frankly I'm quite shocked by the general quality of the
code, but at least it improves with th
entioned in this thread quite low... though
when looking more closely to the package itself I decided to unblock anyway.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc5dab9.70...@debian.org
On 10/25/2010 05:06 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 04:56 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> This particular case I would be tempted to unblock though.
>>
>
> Then, go ahead :)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ..
e by case basis with a lower priority and a higher chance of getting
denied.
This particular case I would be tempted to unblock though.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc59aaa.2020...@debian.org
roposed-updates.
>> Thanks.
>
> Permission to upload?
Yes, please upload.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc48ceb.5080...@debian.org
n empty package instead of no binary package on linux ports?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cbb2972.4080...@debian.org
s
fsckeditor or otrs2 change so they are more compatible and don't need 2
versions of (about) the same code...
But as said above, knowing what changes there are made by otrs2 upstream
to fsckeditor is the first step. Please do show us that diff, TIA.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
ent of squeeze and
> should therefore make it into squeeze.
>
> I prepared a debdiff from 3.4.2 to 3.4.4:
>
> http://grml.org/fai/fai_debdiff_3.4.2_to_3.4.4.diff
> md5sum: 12ce9a1f1019e0cdbc1ca44951f059f0
>
> Please provide a freeze exception for FAI 3.4.4.
unblocke
ng about?
Why is fckeditor included in the package? What changes are there in the
code base of fckeditor and is that still worth not using the fckeditor
already in the archive?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
loses:
+559280)
+
+ -- Christoph Martin Thu, 07 Oct 2010
20:49:13 +0200
+
+sks (1.1.1+dpkgv3-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * remove pramberger.at from README.Debian, because it is no longer
+availlable (closes: #597818)
+
+ -- Christoph Martin Mon, 27 Sep 2010
12:09:03 +0200
Cheers
Luk
-
Hi
I unblocked pdsh as it fixes an RC bug:
+pdsh (2.18-8) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Drop broken runtime check for the genders library (closes: #598393)
+
+ -- Brian Pellin Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:49:13 -0500
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
curity fix. I've pushed the actual diffs to the release-review branch
> on the debian krb5 git.
Hi Sam
Ok, please upload including all of them and let us now when you uploaded.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
gt; Fixes --multihome option. (Closes: #562099)
>
> -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:07:37
> +0200
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
part of gcc-4.4 already. I have also personally
> verified that the Ada Library Information files are unchanged, thus
> preserving compatibility with all the existing -dev packages that depend on
> gnat-4.4.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@li
+- don't fail if we conflict with the pkgs we are reinstalling
+
+ -- Michael Vogt Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:47:51 +0200
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
, 21 Sep 2010 21:05:40 +0200
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb0a547.3000...@debian.org
loses: #579483).
+
+ -- Ralf Treinen Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:06:24 +0200
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb0a370.9040...@debian.org
four digits. (Closes: #595121)
>* Squelch useless locale warnings during package maintainer scripts.
> (Closes: #508764)
Yes, please upload and ping us again when uploaded.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
ntal and those targeted unstable which do not
> trigger new transitions (i.e. NEW -doc package)?
That should be no problem, though it would be great if experimental also
does not get new transitions to avoid mistakes on later uploads.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-relea
00
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca42531.2030...@debian.org
Fri, 24 Sep 2010
16:24:04 +0200
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca424fa.8040...@debian.org
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ca424a5.1060...@debian.org
Hi
I unblocked encfs as it fixes a bunch of security issues. The biggest
changes are translation updates.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
h and makefile.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c9f5965.2000...@debian.org
On 09/19/2010 09:24 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
>
>> Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
>> just unblock it?
>
>
> (re-narrowing to -release)
>
> Well, Adam said "upload and pi
out samba still being vulnerable in squeeze.
Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
just unblock it?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95b7be.3040...@debian.org
Hi
I unblocked lazarus as it fixes an RC bug and the diff looks fine.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c95a95b.30...@debian.org
on
> all the architectures on which it exists in testing; the attached patch
> does so.
Finally that missing feature will be implemented! :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
ty issue.
> unblock webkit/1.2.4-1
unblocked 7 days ago by Julien
> unblock kdegraphics/4:4.4.5-2 (note this also needs djvulibre hinted at a
> higher urgency)
> unblock djvulibre/3.5.23-3
unblocked, djvulibre aged to 5 days
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
it certainly seems to me that 4.4.x is more stable in
practice
> than 4.3.x.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8d2df4.7040...@debian.org
files. None of
>> which are used in the building of D1.
>
> That certainly reduces the diff substantially; thanks. It leaves us
> with [1]
>
> 209 files changed, 13659 insertions(+), 22012 deletions(-)
>
> which is still a significant quantity of changes.
unblo
* Rephrase web server configuration section in README.Debian (LP:
#620412)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c83cd63.5090...@debian.org
test suite.
> Could you unfreeze pdl_2.4.7+dfsg-1 to get it into the squeeze release?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c83a039.6030...@debian.org
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> In any case, please get back to us once the package has reached its
10 days.
>
> The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days.
unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
* Michael Prokop wrote:
> Ok, 3.4.0 went through NEW (thanks) and I just uploaded 3.4.1 with
> the mentioned bugfix to unstable.
>
> Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove usbview from tpu, it's binaries are deemed unusable by the
porter/buildd admin.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove tijmp from tpu its binaries are deemed unusable by the
porter/buildd admin.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove picprog from testing-proposed-updates, it's up-to-date in testing
apart from the binary on s390 which the porter/buildd admin marked as
Not-For-Us.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
On 08/24/2010 03:16 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Hi,
> istanbul/0.2.2-8 fixes two RC bugs and had already aged in sid without
> further reports, please unblock it. debdiff attached.
It has already migrated due to my unblock earlier today :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
1 - 100 of 2459 matches
Mail list logo
