Re: [Fwd: Bug#424048: amanda-server: amrecover excessively slow if index files contain '"' or '\']

2007-05-27 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 18:56 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Bdale Garbee wrote: > > We discussed briefly rolling fresher Amanda into etch and decided it was > > not worth the risk. I would like to re-visit the idea for an etch point > > release... moving etch to Amanda 2.5.1p3 would be a good move in my

Re: [Fwd: Bug#424048: amanda-server: amrecover excessively slow if index files contain '"' or '\']

2007-05-21 Thread Luk Claes
Bdale Garbee wrote: > We discussed briefly rolling fresher Amanda into etch and decided it was > not worth the risk. I would like to re-visit the idea for an etch point > release... moving etch to Amanda 2.5.1p3 would be a good move in my > opinion. There are many code changes, the ones I reviewe

[Fwd: Bug#424048: amanda-server: amrecover excessively slow if index files contain '"' or '\']

2007-05-15 Thread Bdale Garbee
We discussed briefly rolling fresher Amanda into etch and decided it was not worth the risk. I would like to re-visit the idea for an etch point release... moving etch to Amanda 2.5.1p3 would be a good move in my opinion. Bdale --- Begin Message --- On Tuesday, 15.05.2007 at 09:37 -0600, Bdale G