On 09/04/2010 06:32 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:41 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: >> I uploaded and it just got accepted. Unfortunately the older autotools did >> break something, it seems that upstream used a broken libtool that used >> /usr/lib64 and /lib64 instead of /usr/lib and /lib so an RPATH was being >> hardcoded into the binaries. I fixed it by patching the libtool and >> prepending >> /usr/lib and /lib with a simple sed line: >> >> sed -i -r >> 's,^sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="(.*)$$,sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/usr/lib >> /lib \1,' $(CURDIR)/libtool > > I've not unblocked the package yet, as it requires a newer > geany-plugins-common; hopefully that can be resolved soon.
It can :) We just need to come to a final decision on the set of plugins we want to ship in g-p 0.19 (see the "how to proceed with geany-plugins 0.19" thread). Do you have any stron opinion on it? Sticking with the old set (ignoring the new plugins for now) seems the easiest way sofar. Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c82796e.2060...@debian.org
