On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd just have included them in the older changelog stanza "as is" and noted in
> the current version that I'd added them; there's no particular need to know in
> future versions that they were added after the fact. ymmv.
OK, thanks, will do that next
On 28.02.2013 09:26, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As a side note, the changelog didn't really need:
+ * Note: these changes were part of this upload, even though
+they were not detailed in this changelog entry when uploading:
which will look a little
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As a side note, the changelog didn't really need:
>
> + * Note: these changes were part of this upload, even though
> +they were not detailed in this changelog entry when uploading:
>
> which will look a little odd to those perusing the changelo
On 25.02.2013 14:40, Hans Spaans wrote:
Thorsten Glaser schreef op 2013-02-18 14:34:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Hans Spaans wrote:
I saw I quoted the wrong patchset, it should be "Gerrit change
#21606" and I
have the patch now running on multiple installations. But as this
affects the
Well, the p
Thorsten Glaser schreef op 2013-02-18 14:34:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Hans Spaans wrote:
I saw I quoted the wrong patchset, it should be "Gerrit change
#21606" and I
have the patch now running on multiple installations. But as this
affects the
Well, the patch from BZ#39635 in any case.
Package
Thorsten Glaser schreef op 2013-02-18 10:31:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Hans Spaans wrote:
Please apply upstream patch r32085 from bugreport 39635[1] to make
Mediawiki 1.19.3-1 work on Debian again.
Indeed, I had already applied it, as a cow-orker spotted
the same issue last week, but not yet uploa
6 matches
Mail list logo
