On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:37 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:37 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
in the point release,
On Wednesday 14 September 2011 02:40:32 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, September 13, 2011 19:38, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I've attached my proposed change. Please review and let me know if I can
upload.
I think it needs to be uploaded via the sec archive, and the +nmu3
version removed
On Fri, September 16, 2011 08:04, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2011 02:40:32 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, September 13, 2011 19:38, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I've attached my proposed change. Please review and let me know if I
can
upload.
I think it needs to be
On Tue, September 13, 2011 19:38, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I've attached my proposed change. Please review and let me know if I can
upload.
I think it needs to be uploaded via the sec archive, and the +nmu3 version
removed from it. IIRC when syncing sec-master to ftp-master all versions
are
Hi,
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
in the point release, on cd's etc.
I've attached my proposed change. Please
On Tuesday 13 September 2011 04:37:56 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
in the point
7 matches
Mail list logo
