Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 07:50 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the > > semantics of "approve" so that the hint can be added straight away and > > the t-p-u package only becomes a valid c

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 08:14 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]: > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > > * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]: > > > > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd l

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]: > > > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all > > > architectures to be built in

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-18 Thread Luk Claes
On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the > semantics of "approve" so that the hint can be added straight away and > the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate once it's available on > all the architectures on whi

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]: > > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all > > architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an > > "approve" hint ] >

Re: [britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]: > [ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all > architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an > "approve" hint ] cool. can we please as well get an force-approve? ;=) Andi -- To UN

[britney] RFC: Behaviour change for "approve" hints

2010-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an "approve" hint ] Hi, For as long as I can remember, the advice for adding "approve" hints to migrate packages from t-p-u to testing has been "make sure the