Re: [pkg-firebird-general] Uncoordinated firebird transition (closes: Re: Accepted firebird3.0 3.0.1.32609.ds4-3 (source) into unstable)

2016-10-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:52:46PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > So my suggestion is to fall back to either of: > > - disabling firebird support in LO - perhaps bad for users That's status quo in git now. (for 5.2, 5.3 (so buster) will get it back, using 3.0) Looking at popcon, the "Vote"

Re: [pkg-firebird-general] Uncoordinated firebird transition (closes: Re: Accepted firebird3.0 3.0.1.32609.ds4-3 (source) into unstable)

2016-10-10 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Rene Engelhard, 07.10.2016 14:53:22 +0200 |=- > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:04:06PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > Sorry about that, I needed to be more public about my plans. > > Yeah, that would have been nice. :) > > > Thing is, FB2.5's end of life is planned¹ for 2017, which

Re: [pkg-firebird-general] Uncoordinated firebird transition (closes: Re: Accepted firebird3.0 3.0.1.32609.ds4-3 (source) into unstable)

2016-10-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:04:06PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Sorry about that, I needed to be more public about my plans. Yeah, that would have been nice. :) > Thing is, FB2.5's end of life is planned¹ for 2017, which means more > or less a full Debian release cycle without upstream

Re: [pkg-firebird-general] Uncoordinated firebird transition (closes: Re: Accepted firebird3.0 3.0.1.32609.ds4-3 (source) into unstable)

2016-10-07 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Rene Engelhard, 07.10.2016 12:23:29 +0200 |=- > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:05:25AM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > [...] > firebird3.0 (3.0.1.32609.ds4-3) unstable; urgency=medium > [...] > >* Upload to unstable > [...] > > Erm, what? This should have been coordinated. There's