Re: Include kernel with i486 emulation in 3.0r3

2004-10-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Rob Bradford wrote: > I think we should push this matter through with an updated kernel in a 3.0r3 > update before the release of sarge. People could then upgrade to that before > upgrading to sarge. And in my opinion would make the upgrade process much > simpler and more straightfor

Re: Include kernel with i486 emulation in 3.0r3

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:29:56PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > I think we should push this matter through with an updated kernel in a 3.0r3 > update before the release of sarge. People could then upgrade to that before > upgrading to sarge. And in my opinion would make the upgrade pro

Re: Include kernel with i486 emulation in 3.0r3

2004-09-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Rob Bradford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040925 18:25]: > I think we should push this matter through with an updated kernel in a 3.0r3 > update before the release of sarge. People could then upgrade to that before > upgrading to sarge. And in my opinion would make the upgrade process much >

Include kernel with i486 emulation in 3.0r3

2004-09-25 Thread Rob Bradford
I think we should push this matter through with an updated kernel in a 3.0r3 update before the release of sarge. People could then upgrade to that before upgrading to sarge. And in my opinion would make the upgrade process much simpler and more straightforward. And as respect to security updates

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > >Sounds right to me. > > > >Separate, but related, question. Is it ok for us to do a bin-NMU'ish build > >of boot-floppies for ia64 so that we can move to a new kernel image on a > >woody > >point release? We would *really* like to get rid of the 2.4.17 bits in > >wo

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Bdale Garbee wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: > > > This is not a matter of upgrading the boot disk images used in woody. > > It's a matter of syncing up the source used to build the already-working > > images. It would be much better if this could happen without the > > necessity

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Joel Konkle-Parker
Bdale Garbee wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: This is not a matter of upgrading the boot disk images used in woody. It's a matter of syncing up the source used to build the already-working images. It would be much better if this could happen without the necessity for 3.0.24 or w

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson) writes: > This is not a matter of upgrading the boot disk images used in woody. > It's a matter of syncing up the source used to build the already-working > images. It would be much better if this could happen without the > necessity for 3.0.24 or whatever, since t

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2004-02-01 16:45:03, schrieb Joel Konkle-Parker: >According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to >be cut pretty soon. > >How's it looking? Nice, but are there plans for new bootfloppies ? The current ones are rather outdated... >Joel Konk

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:34:39AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Is it possible to get the boot-floppies from unstable (which are the ones > > *used* in woody) pushed into this release? Or if new boot-floppies are > > going > > to be used, to make sure they're actua

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:34:39AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Martin Schulze wrote: > > >Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > > >> According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to > > >> be cut pr

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-03 Thread Martin Schulze
Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Martin Schulze wrote: > >Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > >> According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to > >> be cut pretty soon. > >> > >> How's it looking? > > > >It'll proba

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Martin Schulze wrote: >Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: >> According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to >> be cut pretty soon. >> >> How's it looking? > >It'll probably be mid or end of February. > >Regards, > >

Re: 3.0r3

2004-02-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Joel Konkle-Parker wrote: > According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to > be cut pretty soon. > > How's it looking? It'll probably be mid or end of February. Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain

3.0r3

2004-02-01 Thread Joel Konkle-Parker
According to http://people.debian.org/~joey/stable.html, 3.0r3 is due to be cut pretty soon. How's it looking? -- Joel Konkle-Parker Webmaster [Ballsome.com] E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone [662-518-1636]