On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:12:50PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | The default when no compat level is specified is 1, not 5. So this one line
> | can have a very significant impact on the package, and it can be very
> | difficult to trace all the effects -- hence, not something the release t
On 16 February 2007 at 21:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
| This is present in the debdiff:
|
| diff -Nru /tmp/cmWaq0sk4n/rggobi-2.1.4-2/debian/compat
/tmp/jsOBhqjdsu/rggobi-2.1.4-4/debian/compat
| --- /tmp/cmWaq0sk4n/rggobi-2.1.4-2/debian/compat1970-01-01
00:00:00.0 +
| +5
|
| T
On 16 February 2007 at 21:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:44:39PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > Release team:
|
| > | > I just
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:44:39PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Release team:
> | > I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
> | > with the changel
Steve,
On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Release team:
|
| > I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
| > with the changelog entry below. This should hopefully make
| > it into et
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Release team:
> I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
> with the changelog entry below. This should hopefully make
> it into etch.
The package uploaded to t-p-u still includes a change to the d
Release team:
I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
with the changelog entry below. This should hopefully make
it into etch.
Debian-admin:
Thanks, I am done on pergolesi. Nice machine :) Feel free to
purge these:
r-base-dev ggo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Dear debian-admin team,
>
> On 12 February 2007 at 14:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Good point -- I only ever think of these as porting machines, but t
Dear debian-admin team,
On 12 February 2007 at 14:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Good point -- I only ever think of these as porting machines, but to
| > simply setup a 'backport' (or build of the now-fixed pkg in unstable)
| > I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Good point -- I only ever think of these as porting machines, but to
> simply setup a 'backport' (or build of the now-fixed pkg in unstable)
> I could do it on any box.
> Any empirical data on machines to try or not to try?
"The
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 05:38:01PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:52:42AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:12:28 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a w
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:52:42AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:12:28 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way for me to access a testing machine for builds?
> > >
> > There's deboo
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:12:28 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> > Is there a way for me to access a testing machine for builds?
> >
> There's debootstrap, which can create testing chroots.
That is entirely orthogonal to my qu
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:12:28 +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Is there a way for me to access a testing machine for builds?
>
There's debootstrap, which can create testing chroots.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On 11 February 2007 at 23:40, Steve Langasek wrote:
| severity 400835 grave
| thanks
|
| On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:43:39AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
| > I was recently looking at the r-omegahat-ggobi package on etch (source
| > rggobi), and the package is critically broken in that it contains
| >
severity 400835 grave
thanks
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:43:39AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> I was recently looking at the r-omegahat-ggobi package on etch (source
> rggobi), and the package is critically broken in that it contains
> nothing at all except for the changelog and copyright.
> This was
Hi again,
Dirk Eddelbuettel (the rggobi maintainer) wrote the following (and is
happy for it to be forward to -release):
> | Would it be possible to let one of the fixed rggobi versions into etch?
> | The maintainer is Dirk Eddelbuettel (CCed), who is CCed here.
>
> I'm in favour and see no rea
Hi all,
I was recently looking at the r-omegahat-ggobi package on etch (source
rggobi), and the package is critically broken in that it contains
nothing at all except for the changelog and copyright.
This was noted late last year and fixed in sid (#400835). However, the
fix has not progressed i
18 matches
Mail list logo
