Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Package: emacs21 (optional; Rob Browning) [emacs21/21.4a-3 ; =] [add/edit
comment]
207932 [ ] [NONFREE-DOC:UNMODIFIABLE] emacs21: Includes non-free
documents
These are not FDL documents, they're just plain unmodifiable documents,
and it's quite clear
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the
bugs.
In most cases I
Nathanael Nerode writes:
Package: cpp (standard; Debian GCC Maintainers et al.) [gcc-defaults/1.30 ;
=] [add/edit comment]
23 [ ] [NONFREE-DOC:UNMODIFIABLE] cpp: contains non-free
manpages
Package: cpp-4.0-doc (required; Debian GCC Maintainers et al.)
[gcc-4.0/4.0.2-9 ;
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the
bugs.
In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with these
bugs on their
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:40:42PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the
bugs.
In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with
I went through the RC bugs which apply to etch and are older than one year.
This is a rather disturbing list, as you would expect from the age of the bugs.
In most cases I don't think you can expect the maintainers to deal with these
bugs on their own.
What are the release managers planning to do
In linux.debian.devel.release Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libmpeg2-4 (optional; Loic Minier et al.) [mpeg2dec/0.4.0b-4 ; =]
[add/edit comment]
14-Aug-2005: Andi: is sarge-ignore; discussion about permanent exception
268603 [ ] libmpeg2-4: Non-PIC shared library
7 matches
Mail list logo
