Re: Apparent portmap to rpcbind transition?

2010-01-20 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 06:49:07PM +, Mark Brown wrote: >On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote: >>As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that >>nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - >>at least, nfs-kernel-server has swit

Re: Apparent portmap to rpcbind transition?

2010-01-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that > nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at > least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't > have two things claimi

Apparent portmap to rpcbind transition?

2010-01-04 Thread Mark Brown
As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't have two things claiming the portmap port. Since a number of packages currently rely on p