On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:23:42AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-19 19:08]:
> > This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
> > I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
>
> We use gcc-4.1 f
* Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-19 19:08]:
> This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel.
> I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that.
We use gcc-4.1 for the kernel anyway, rather than the default
compiler.
--
Martin Michlmayr
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
> > kernel bug?
> >
>
> It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
>
>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
> kernel bug?
>
It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If
anythi
Kyle McMartin a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a
>> kernel bug?
>>
>
> It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions...
I am actually asking that, because on the 3 pro
Kyle McMartin a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Grant Grundler writes:
>> ...
Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
Can I "apt-get install -t sid
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:33:08AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Grant Grundler writes:
> ...
> > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
> > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid sys
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Grant Grundler writes:
...
> > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it?
> > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get
> > the right version?
>
> gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.3-hppa64 are bot
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Grant Grundler writes:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > ...
> > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> > > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to
Grant Grundler writes:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> ...
> > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
> >
> > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
> FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results
> than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*.
>
> So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default.
Has anyone built a kernel
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>> Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload
>> gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as
>> for all other archs.
>>
>> As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and
>> mipsel,
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Now that gnat-4.3 is on all architectures, I would like to upload
> gcc-defaults 1.70 making it the default on alpha, mips and mipsel as
> for all other archs.
>
> As is, gcc-defaults cannot enter testing because on alpha, mips and
> mipsel, if depends on gnat-4.2 which is
13 matches
Mail list logo
