2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt :
> If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> that the partman-* changes won't be included?
I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle. Given your
reply, now I
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt :
> > If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> > push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> > that the partman-* changes won't be included?
>
> I didn't kn
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> 2011/9/22 Arno Töll :
>> > To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
>> > fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u
>> > (#637020):
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/22 Arno Töll :
> > To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
> > fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020):
> >
> > Bug # -- package -- title
> > 635384 -- parted -- detec
2011/9/22 Arno Töll :
> To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
> fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020):
>
> Bug # -- package -- title
> 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL)
Colin et al, any chance this can make it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone (please keep CCs:),
on behalf of the kreebsd porters I am trying to explore our
possibilities to improve ZFS (installer) support in a future Squeeze
point release.
To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug
f
6 matches
Mail list logo
