On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferabl
Christoph, I made a full sdk for 3.0 in ubuntu thunderbird-dev now and managed
to move enigmail on that base ... maybe check the last upload to lucid. I would
need all those changes to make enigmail build. For questions you can find me in
debian-devel ;).
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:18:36PM +,
On 20 March 2010 18:23, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:30:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
>> > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
>>
>> Speaking for the pkg-mozilla team, everything is more or le
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 07:23:54PM +0100, Christoph Goehre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:30:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> > > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
> >
> > Speaking for the pkg-mozilla team, e
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:30:37AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
>
> Speaking for the pkg-mozilla team, everything is more or less in shape,
> except the icedove transition that has not
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 14:23 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > > We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> > > fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> > > ups
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> > fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> > upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
> > Furth
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Furthermore we would like to get an overview of the remaining transitions
> that need to be done.
I'd like to transition GMP from 2.4.x to 2.5.x (currently in experimental).
Cheers,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On mer., 2010-03-17 at 16:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> Evolution : business as usual, all packages depending on libcamel,
> evolution, evolution-data-server or libedata-cal will need a transition.
> Yves-Alexis told me he’ll upload as much as possible of it to
> experimental.
It's alread
There will also be a Telepathy transition, but the Telepathy team
should know better
Empathy shouldn't be a problem for transitions as far as I can see. Some
libraries with questionable ABIs (libempathy and libempathy-gtk) have
been removed, but nothing in testing seems to depend on them anywa
> You mean regardless of 9 RC bugs opened against the package? That even
> sounds like "please force the newest upstream versions into squeeze
No of course not. I haven't looked at the RC bugs recently but they are
generally fixed by newer upstream or the severity is too high.
Regards,
randy
Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferabl
Dear release team,
I am working with Charles, friendly folks from Canonical/Ubuntu and
upstream on getting Eucalyptus into Debian - the Amazon-compatible cloud
infrastructure. It is already in Ubuntu, but I think I am not erroenous
to claim that the packages do profit from our joint effort.
I th
Following Yves-Alexis to update the status on LXDE team. :)
As we are just initialing to build a LXDE team for related packages. I
expected we would make these works done faster and more smoothly.
The lxsession 0.4.2 is pending for upload as lxsession 0.4.1 is still in
sid and blocked lxde-commo
Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org
Much to my regret the GNUstep stack is not in a releasable shape.
There are 5 RC bugs (+2 not reported). 4 of them are trivial to fix,
I'm just waiting to accumulate more
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:23:11PM -0700, Randall Donald wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:21 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:51:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > - nouveau is nowhere near ready, and needs someone to take care of
> > > getting the userspace compone
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:21 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:51:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > - nouveau is nowhere near ready, and needs someone to take care of
> > getting the userspace components (and firmware) in sid soon
>
> I know it's non-free, but I guess we
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:51:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> - nouveau is nowhere near ready, and needs someone to take care of
> getting the userspace components (and firmware) in sid soon
I know it's non-free, but I guess we should look for a nvidia proprietary
solution too. It tends to
[Please keep me Cc:ed, as I'm not subscribed to debian-release; note
that the FusionForge list is moderated for non-members]
Philipp Kern, 2010-03-14 21:42:58 +0100 :
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42:58 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferably
Hi.
Excerpts from Philipp Kern's message of Dom Mar 14 17:42:58 -0300 2010:
(...)
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready ye
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
openoffice.org mostly should be on track and shouldn't change that much
anymore (exc
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
> yet fixed in unstable.
>
> We would like to know what ne
Il giorno 14/mar/2010, alle ore 21.42, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
> Furthermore we
Bill Allombert writes:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
>> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
>> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
Hello,
Le dimanche 14 mars 2010 à 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern a écrit :
> Dear fellow developers,
>
>
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze whi
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against release.debian.org,
> preferably
Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
> fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
> upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
If at all possible, I'd like to get sane-backends 1.0.21 into
Squeeze. 1.0.20 is old and 1.0.21 would bring many new features
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to
> be fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features
> or new upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not
> ready yet.
With my pkg-wml hat on:
The pkg-wml team recently h
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
> still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
> yet fixed in unstable.
>
> We would like to know what ne
Hi
Dne Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:33:59 +0100
Andreas Barth napsal(a):
> Python 2.6 is already in unstable, just not as default. I think this
> means that this transition could be started anytime, as soon as all
> the rdeps are available for binNMUs. (In other words, please don't
> start the transition
On dim., 2010-03-14 at 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
[…]
>
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against relea
Hi,
On Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 21:57:49 +0100, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32
>
> Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33?
>
> I see at least two improvements
* Michal Čihař (ni...@debian.org) [100314 22:30]:
> Hi
>
> Dne Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:42:58 +0100
> Philipp Kern napsal(a):
>
> > From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32,
> > eglibc 2.11, Python 2.6, X11R7.5, Gnome 2.30, qt 4.6 and KDE 4.4.
> >
> > Transitions we alrea
Hi
Dne Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:42:58 +0100
Philipp Kern napsal(a):
> From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32,
> eglibc 2.11, Python 2.6, X11R7.5, Gnome 2.30, qt 4.6 and KDE 4.4.
>
> Transitions we already know about
>
>
> * eglibc 2.11
36 matches
Mail list logo
