On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Sprint
> --
> We feel it would be useful for the Release Team as a whole to get
> together to think about what the plans are for the next release. As
> such, we're planning a sprint to meet in person. Details will follow
> once di
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:28:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > - be less strict and keep old binaries (and thus 2 versions of the same
> > source package) in testing. This applies in particular for libraries
> > going through SONAME changes and which can happily coexist during a
> > tran
Hi,
sorry that I'm late to this party and that this mail is mostly an AOL...
On Mittwoch, 30. März 2011, Luk Claes wrote:
> # package quality
> Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
>
> This is a never ending go
Hi,
Could you please add some background information to
< http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals > ?
In my case, I am not sure if that wiki page is to make a wish or
wishes that have already been agreed and granted.
Some of you might know that there is an on-going effort to port
Debian to A
(Moving to -devel, since -release is not a discussion list, and keeping
lots of context because of this)
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, sean finney wrote:
> I think the quality of our releases has always been stellar, but the
> freezes cause quite a bit of slowdown and even demotivation for those
> who
sean finney wrote:
> hi -release team,
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:13:19AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > Once again, we will use feedb...@release.debian.org and welcome all
> > > comments before 11th April.
> > >
> >
> > We've had a rather poor response to this request, so I'd encourage
hi -release team,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:13:19AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Once again, we will use feedb...@release.debian.org and welcome all
> > comments before 11th April.
> >
>
> We've had a rather poor response to this request, so I'd encourage
> anyone who's been putting it off t
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:28:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I propose the following additions:
>
> 1) No uninstallable packages, according to their dependencies, are
>
> 2) No packages with (detectable) conflicts are shipped as part of a
After Ralf's ack to document them for Wheezy,
Am 31.03.2011 14:35, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
>> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd
>> still
>> require hal or will it
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
> require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
>
On BSD it's reduced f
[ Bcc: -release to keep track of the actual proposals ]
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> # package quality
> Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
>
> This is a never ending goal of su
Am 30.03.2011 19:21, schrieb Luk Claes:
> Regarding reliability I'm doing some work regarding NFS, though one of
> the main outstanding issues is the race between availability of the
> network devices and the end of the network init script AFAICS. It would
> also not be a bad idea to have a discuss
Hi all,
[...]
> # package quality
> Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
>
> This is a never ending goal of sustaining our packages quality by
> improving our tests and following up closely... so needless to sa
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 19:21 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
> # remove obsolete libraries
> Advocate: Barry deFreese and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RemoveOldLibs
>
> This worked quite well and should continue so we can get rid of obsolete
> libra
Hi
Below an update of the release goals I advocated and some thoughts on
others.
> Release Goals
> -
> As a first step towards establishing release goals for wheezy, we will
be reviewing
> each of the goals which we had for squeeze [RDO:SGoals] to see which
have been achieved and whic
15 matches
Mail list logo