Your message dated Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:26:10 +0100 with message-id <y6rwugavtwhfq...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk has caused the Debian Bug report #1024322, regarding transition: dpdk to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org Hello Thomas and Release Team, As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, as we have done for the past few releases. Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the transition. Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that point). The upstream release might happen before or after the 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an exception. Would this plan work for everyone? Bullseye tickets for reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974588 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974667 -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassisignature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Luca On 2022-12-26 10:59:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Already uploaded to remove those tests for now, can be fixed later The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing. Cheers > > On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, 10:43 Sebastian Ramacher, <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On 2022-12-22 20:43:20 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > > > > <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > > > > > > Hi Luca > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher > > > > <sramac...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: > > > > pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to > > > > allow > > > > > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. > > > > This > > > > > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both > > > > projects, > > > > > > > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > > > > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to > > > > unstable, > > > > > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to > > > > finish the > > > > > > > > transition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable > > > > (no > > > > > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at > > > > that > > > > > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > > > > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > > > > > > > exception. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the > > > > moreinfo > > > > > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in > > > > experimental. > > > > > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and > > > > are > > > > > > already compatible. > > > > > > > > > > Please go ahead > > > > > > > > Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only > > > > has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so > > > > it won't show in apt rdepends et al). > > > > > > I'll schedule those builds once dpkd migrated. Otherwise the rebuilds > > > migrate before the recommends can be satisfied in testing. > > > > collect has been rebuilt. > > > > There's one remaining issue: openvswitch is causing autopkgtest > > regressions in ovn-octavia-provider on the 32 bit architectures. > > > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/o/ovn-octavia-provider/29661632/log.gz > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > -- > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher > > -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---