Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:18:33 -0600
with message-id
and subject line Re: transition: jpeg-xl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053866,
regarding transition: jpeg-xl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi
On 2024-06-14 08:10:56 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Emilio,
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:40 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> >
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > On 31/05/2024 12:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > jpeg-xl (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > .
> > >
Emilio,
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:40 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
>
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On 31/05/2024 12:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > jpeg-xl (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> > * Upload 0.8.2-4 to unstable. Closes: #1053866
>
> Uploading to unstable doesn'
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1053866 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre } [release.debian.org]
transition: jpeg-xl
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as
Control: reopen -1
On 31/05/2024 12:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
jpeg-xl (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Upload 0.8.2-4 to unstable. Closes: #1053866
Uploading to unstable doesn't close the transition bug. There are still things
to do here, such as binNMUs, and ensurin
Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 10:34:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1053866: fixed in jpeg-xl 0.8.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053866,
regarding transition: jpeg-xl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
6 matches
Mail list logo