On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 05:33:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Fair enough. I've approved this version of hal to go in, and I'll just take
the filesystem hit on my ext3 keychain. ;)
Just checked the progress of this, according to the update excuses hal_tpu
still needs approvel by RM.. Did
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:09:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Sjoerd,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:20:13AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes
the sync
Hi Sjoerd,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:20:13AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 4:38 -0700]:
I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
from sync to async (which would be a
tag 309591 sarge
thanks
Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]:
apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
default:
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html
This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]:
apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
default:
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html
This may or may not be a
Hi!
Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 4:38 -0700]:
I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the
--async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy
flash hardware and greatly speed up the
6 matches
Mail list logo
