Re: Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > I've patched ettercap to fix this bug #311615. The patch is filed in > > the bug report, and example packages are here: > > http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ettercap/ > > If anyone cares to review it and/or upload it, it's all yo

Re: Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: [ettercap] >> Release Team: please will you accept this for sarge? >> Is high urgency still OK, or should I make it critical? > > At this point,

Re: Bug#311615: ettercap: [CAN-2005-1796] buffer overflow in ec_curses.c

* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050602 20:10]: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:54:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > [ettercap] > >> Release Team: please will you accept this for sarge? > >> Is high