On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 at 05:05:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
I guess the inetd se_v4mapped logical inversion fix and the “ping -w”
support, both from upstream 1.8, would be important to have.
My backport of making tcp/udp be v4-only already included the inversion fix
as part of the conflict
Hi Simon,
Simon McVittie wrote:
[ping on kfreebsd]
(I also don't have a kFreeBSD machine around to test that aspect of it.)
If you want, you can prepare a test-case on io.d.n or asdfasdf.d.n,
and me (or KiBi or aurel32) can test the stuff which needs root
permissions or setuid.
Another option
[ CC'ing explicitly Guillem in case he missed the mail ]
On 11/27/2010 03:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +, Hector Oron wrote:
Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testing?
I had a go at backporting the fixes that looked important. I haven't
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:39:28 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
[ CC'ing explicitly Guillem in case he missed the mail ]
On 11/27/2010 03:24 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +, Hector Oron wrote:
Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testing?
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 16:07:19 +, Hector Oron wrote:
Could you consider backporting the fix to unstable/testing?
I had a go at backporting the fixes that looked important. I haven't tested
this work-in-progress version yet, but it compiles...
5 matches
Mail list logo
