-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 18:36, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
No it's not. A user that prefers to have broken software rather than
no software (if the option non broken software is absent) should use
unstable. I mean it.
You can easily use testing by default,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-04 16:11, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[1] search +testing +lenny on
The searches were performed without the '+' to have 'testing or lenny' etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-06-03 19:59, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
It depends of your definition of usable. I don't think it's usable on
a daily basis because:
FWIW, let the users decide what they use or want to use. I took a curde
estimate by counting what the readers
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 02:11:51PM +, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Arguments like
On 2008-06-04 15:34, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
(2) To a user who wishes to use a working feature of an imperfect
package, Debian is better with the imperfect package than
without: MISSING PACKAGE
4 matches
Mail list logo
