Your message dated Sun, 16 May 2010 20:09:52 +0200 with message-id <20100516180952.ga18...@patate.is-a-geek.org> and subject line Re: Bug#499698: [etchnhalf releasenotes] ipv4 forwarding (accidently) turned off has caused the Debian Bug report #499698, regarding [etchnhalf releasenotes] ipv4 forwarding (accidently) turned off to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 499698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499698 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---package: release.debian.org ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Slight hiccup for etch users with the new linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf Date: Tuesday 02 September 2008 14:43 From: Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> To: debian-...@lists.debian.org, project-etchnah...@teams.debian.net Cc: John Winters <j...@sinodun.org.uk> Hi John, thanks for your bugreport. Full quote for the benefit of the etchnhalf mailinglist: On Friday 15 August 2008 16:37, John Winters wrote: > I put the new etch-and-a-half kernel on my N2100 today to cure its > slight NFS problems. All seemed well at first until I realised that it > was no longer functioning as a router. > > After a bit of research I discovered the problem. There's an > outstanding bug in procps in etch (fixed in lenny) which doesn't > manifest itself as long as you're running 2.6.18 but does once you > switch to 2.6.24. > > To fix it, edit /etc/sysctl.conf and change: > > net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1 > > to > > net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 > > I mention it just to save anyone else from having to do the same research. As I see it, there are two ways to solve this: a.) create a procps-etchnhalf package (IMHO ugly and not really saving us from b anyway) or b.) document this in http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/etchnhalf Or is the above report bogus? I havent confirmed it, but then I don't have a reason to disbelieve it neither. regards, Holger -------------------------------------------------------pgpnlK3d4qfyC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 14:12:27 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > As I see it, there are two ways to solve this: a.) create a procps-etchnhalf > package (IMHO ugly and not really saving us from b anyway) or b.) document > this in http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/etchnhalf > etch is EOL, so probably no need to keep this bug open. Cheers, Juliensignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---