On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > > IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after
> > > the Squ
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after
> > the Squeeze release.
> >
> Sounds like a good plan.
Here we are and I suggest w
tag 511582 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after
> the Squeeze release.
>
Sounds like a good plan.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le Thursday 4 November 2010 23:40:39 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 00:51:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > > In
Forwarding to debian-release as I b0rkled the address before.
Sorry…
Cheers, OdyX
--
Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
CH-1020 Renens
did...@raboud.com
--- Begin Message ---
Le Thursday 4 November 2010 23:40:39 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:04P
5 matches
Mail list logo