Re: Bug#511582: Plan of action ?

2011-04-11 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:16:46PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after the Squeeze

Re: Bug#511582: Plan of action ?

2011-04-08 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after the Squeeze release. Sounds like a good plan. Here we are and I suggest we

Re: Bug#511582: Plan of action ?

2010-12-08 Thread Julien Cristau
tag 511582 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 22:23:04 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: IMO we should ignore this for Squeeze and proceed with removing opie after the Squeeze release. Sounds like a good plan. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#511582: Plan of action ?

2010-12-05 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Le Thursday 4 November 2010 23:40:39 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit : On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 00:51:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: In

Bug#511582: Plan of action ?

2010-12-02 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Forwarding to debian-release as I b0rkled the address before. Sorry… Cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com ---BeginMessage--- Le Thursday 4 November 2010 23:40:39 Moritz Muehlenhoff, vous avez écrit : On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:04PM