On Sat, 18, Apr, 2009 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Adeodato Simó spoke thus..
> Right. I thought about it, and please do implement such cleaning on each
> dinstall, and we can close this bug when the code is in place.
> Additionally, it’d be great if a mail could be sent for each transition
> that gets aut
+ Mark Hymers (Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:39:53 +0100):
> On Wed, 15, Apr, 2009 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli spoke thus..
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:25:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > > I see the PTS as the consumer of the YAML file. There can be,
> > > > theoretically, other consum
On Wed, 15, Apr, 2009 at 11:04:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli spoke thus..
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:25:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > I see the PTS as the consumer of the YAML file. There can be,
> > > theoretically, other consumers and basically you are implicitly
> > > proposing that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:25:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I see the PTS as the consumer of the YAML file. There can be,
> > theoretically, other consumers and basically you are implicitly
> > proposing that all consumers implement the "cleanup upon
> > migration" logics.
FWIW, Adam Barrat
+ Stefano Zacchiroli (Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:02:55 +0200):
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > The way it works is that the Release Team specifies a target
> > package/version combination that must migrate to testing, and all listed
> > packages are blocked until that
5 matches
Mail list logo
