Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 08:05 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
> I know this is 20/20 hindsight, but this could have been handled much
> better by raising bugs against and fixing all the client libraries
> *before* removing the libogg.la. It would probably also be a good idea
> to discourage th
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Erik de Castro Lopo]
> > I'm think I'm coming in rather late on this, but why were these .la
> > files removed? I've read through bug#539687 and its still not clear.
>
> I can't speak for Ron,
Thanks Peter, you'll do.
> but in general, the reason to remove .la files
>
[Erik de Castro Lopo]
> I'm think I'm coming in rather late on this, but why were these .la
> files removed? I've read through bug#539687 and its still not clear.
I can't speak for Ron, but in general, the reason to remove .la files
is that pkg-config (and the .pc files in /usr/lib/pkgconfig) off
Ron wrote:
> At least upstream seems active on that one. And the maintainer was around
> to respond to #518037 in March, even if their response wasn't entirely
> satisfactory and upstream themselves asked to reopen it :/ So he's not
> entirely MIA ... OTOH, Erik, the upstream maintainer, does s
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:26:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > And libarts1c2a has its own grave bug, also open since March, with no
> > response whatsoever from its maintainers.
>
> Strange, I thought the maintainers would be more responsive, lets put
> them in Cc.
>
Arts is dead (*
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:26:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ron wrote:
> > Well, to be frankly honest, I don't actually _want_ you guys to blindly
> > schedule blanket binNMUs for the lot of these. I'd much rather that it
> > shook out all the packages that were as neglected as this was when I ha
Ron wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 01:04:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hmm, you do know that it's your job to hand that list (including all the
>> reverse deps of reverse deps ...) to the release team including the
>> necessary dep waits so we don't have to reschedule them till all succeeded?
>
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 01:04:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hmm, you do know that it's your job to hand that list (including all the
> reverse deps of reverse deps ...) to the release team including the
> necessary dep waits so we don't have to reschedule them till all succeeded?
Well, to be fran
8 matches
Mail list logo
