On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Please see here:
[...]
Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are
replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks
for the question
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please see here:
[...]
> Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are
> replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for
> the question anyway.
Thanks for assuming I havent read those URLs y
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:34:42AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
Please try the newest packaging as requested here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
Hi,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
>
> Please try the newest packaging as requested here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738
I can only see ghostscript 9.0 packages th
6 matches
Mail list logo
