Control: tag 653582 wheezy-ignore
Control: tag 593141 wheezy-ignore
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:11:56 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:21:57PM +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
> > For now I'd prefer the 'wheezy-ignore' rather than removing the ia64
> > ruby package.
>
>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:21:57PM +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
> I took a look at this a few weeks ago.
>
> The problem is the code in the cont.c file which implements continuations.
> A thread saves its own stack and its thread context itself while it
> is running. The ruby programmers believ
I took a look at this a few weeks ago.
The problem is the code in the cont.c file which implements continuations.
A thread saves its own stack and its thread context itself while it is
running. The ruby programmers believe that that the saved info can be
used by another thread to switch over.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:22:00 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:20:07 +0100
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Dear release team, at some point before the wheezy release, we need to
> > > decide what to
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 21:51:28 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/01/12 at 21:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ruby1.9.1 is known to be broken on ia64 (see #593141). It currently
> > builds only because the test suite is disabled on that architecture, but
> > the fact that other Ruby packag
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:51:28PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/01/12 at 21:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ruby1.9.1 is known to be broken on ia64 (see #593141). It currently
> > builds only because the test suite is disabled on that architecture, but
> > the fact that other Ruby packa
On 16/01/12 at 21:20 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> ruby1.9.1 is known to be broken on ia64 (see #593141). It currently
> builds only because the test suite is disabled on that architecture, but
> the fact that other Ruby packages fail to build on ia64 doesn't surprise
> me.
>
> Dear release team,
7 matches
Mail list logo