Re: Bug#598389: Unblock request for suricata 1.0.2

2010-12-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
fixed 598389 1.0.1-1squeeze1 thanks On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 16:13 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi all > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:44:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I've just approved suricata 1.0.1-1squeeze1; it's just waiting for the > > s390 build to be uploaded before it can m

Re: Bug#598389: Unblock request for suricata 1.0.2

2010-12-15 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi all On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 09:44:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 23:01 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > > On 12/01/2010 10:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > 0012-moving-http_client_body-logic-to-use-it-per-transact.patch is > > > mentioned neither in debian/patches

Re: Bug#598389: Unblock request for suricata 1.0.2

2010-12-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 23:01 +0100, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > On 12/01/2010 10:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > 0012-moving-http_client_body-logic-to-use-it-per-transact.patch is > > mentioned neither in debian/patches/series, nor the changelog; was it > > intended to be included in the package, or

Re: Bug#598389: Unblock request for suricata 1.0.2

2010-12-01 Thread Pierre Chifflier
On 12/01/2010 10:48 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > I've just had a quick look at your t-p-u upload for suricata. Without > getting too far in to checking the patches themselves, one thing that I > noticed is that the diff adds nine new patches to debian/patches but > debian/patches/series is only ei