Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to verify earlier than that). What's the status of that upload? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Thu, Oct  6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Attached patch should fix the problem.  I can upload a fixed kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to verify earlier than that). What's the status of that

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Forgive my ignorance on the precise mechanics, but is it correct that the /boot/kernel/kernel.gz symlink creation was also removed? Yes, this is all curft for backward compatibility with versions of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD that have never been

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related query, has

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] I think in the worst case we can just keep the current (as in non-point release version) of d-i on kfreebsd-* for the next point release and don't update to the binNMU. It's actually from

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty [...] $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb

Bug#633561: kfreebsd-i386 d-i/squeeze FTBFS (was Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1)

2011-10-05 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/6 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: That said, this needs to be fixed, and we're all not very happy, given the fact that we actually did ask before if something changes in the udeb output. I have to say in my defense that I did check for changes in udeb output. However these changes

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-03 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/2 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If I'd been sure that binNMUs would work then we could have scheduled them directly; the previous uploads have all been sourceful, so I assumed there was a reason for that. In any case, I've flagged the uploads for acceptance at the next

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-02 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads need to happen within the next day, or they'll miss the cut-off.

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 14:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If there are changes which need propagating to the udebs Yes. The if_msk update is specially important for the installer. If the aim is to do that for 6.0.3 then those uploads

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 633561 + confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related query, has a test build

Processed: Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 633561 + confirmed Bug #633561 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-9 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633561:

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze point release closes over this weekend. Uploaded. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 633561 + pending thanks On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze point release closes over this weekend. Uploaded. Flagged for acceptance at the

Processed: Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 633561 + pending Bug #633561 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-9 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633561:

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze point release closes over this weekend. Uploaded.

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 22:59 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Please go ahead, bearing in mind that the upload window for the Squeeze

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-30 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up.  As a related query, has a test build of kfreebsd-kernel-di-* been performed in order to find out whether any additional modules

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 11:04 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: * Disable buggy 009_disable_duped_modules.diff. It was disabling many more modules than built into kernel (e.g. all USB modules). A few queries here, I'm afraid. [...] -

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-23 Thread Robert Millan
Btw, if you can, please also consider this change in addition to the ones proposed. * Add a few missing files in header package to make it possible to build external modules. (Closes: #630509) Thanks! -- Robert Millan Index: debian/changelog

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-18 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:   * Fix net802.11 stack kernel memory disclosure (CVE-2011-2480).     (Closes: #631160)     - 000_net80211_disclosure.diff This looks okay, although I think you meant #631161. Yes, indeed #631161. Your last message in the log there says

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tags 633561 + moreinfo squeeze thanks Hi, Apologies for letting this fall between the cracks for so long. On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 17:46 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Please consider this update for kfreebsd-8 in squeeze. It fixes a security bug, a kernel panic condition in if_msk driver, and

Processed: Re: Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 633561 + moreinfo squeeze Bug #633561 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-9 Added tag(s) squeeze and moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633561:

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-07-11 Thread Robert Millan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Please consider this update for kfreebsd-8 in squeeze. It fixes a security bug, a kernel panic condition in if_msk driver, and disables a buggy patch which disabled 58 kernel modules (including

Bug#633561: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze1

2011-07-11 Thread Robert Millan
Please consider this version instead; I made a mistake when importing the msk diff (both versions have been tested and are known to work, but the first one is missing some of the upstream fixes). Thanks -- Robert Millan Index: debian/changelog